University Men’s Perceptions of Emergency Contraception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-1-106Keywords:
Sexual health; Men; Knowledge; Perception; Education.Abstract
Objective: Current research on emergency contraceptive needs and usage is centered on females’ experiences and perspectives. The purpose of this study is to gain more insight into
men’s understanding of Emergency Contraception (EC).
Study Design: 126 undergraduate students from two universities completed quantitative
surveys that measured men’s thoughts about EC use, experiences with EC, relationship and
sexual status, visitation to health care providers, and participants’ knowledge of reproductive
and sexual health.
Results: Most participants in this study had knowledge of sexual health, reproductive health,
and contraceptives but demonstrated lower knowledge of EC. Although participant knowledge
of EC was lower, with only about two-thirds of the participants able to answer the true/false
questions regarding EC accurately. Seventy-eight percent of participants stated that they did
not have moral objections to EC. The majority of participants had two or less sexual partners
and used condoms (n=81) as their primary method of birth control. Although participants knew
about contraception choices, many participants were unaware, misinformed, and confused
about EC.
Conclusion: Study results indicate that more research should be conducted to further understand
men’s knowledge and experience with EC. Since males and females hold responsibility in
accessing EC when engaging in unprotected sex and if an unintended pregnancy is possible,
it is important that interventions and programs address male’s involvement with and accurate
knowledge of EC. By creating interventions for men around this issue, males are in a better
position to control their own fertility and to have optimal sexual health.
References
Marcell V, Waks B, Rutkow L, McKenna R, Rompalo A, Hogan T. What do we know about males and emergency contraception? a synthesis of the literature. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2012; 44(3): 184-193. doi: 10.1363/4418412
Makenzius M, Gådin K, Tydén T, Romild U, Larsson M. Male students’ behaviour, knowledge, attitudes, and needs in sexual and reproductive health matters. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2009; 14(4): 268- 276. doi: 10.1080/13625180903015871
Finer B, Zolna R. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities. Contraception 2011; 84(5): 478-485. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
Treadwell M, Young W. The right U.S men’s health report: high time to adjust priorities and attack disparities. American Journal of Public Health. 2013; 103(1): 5-6. doi: 10.2105/ AJPH.2012.300895
Raymond G, Trussell J, Polis B. Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007; 109(1): 181-188.
Melton L, Stanford B, Dewitt J. Use of levonorgestrel EC in Utah: Is it more than “Plan B”? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2012; 44(1): 22-29. doi: 10.1363/4402212
Wright R, Frost J, Turok K (2012). A qualitative exploration of emergency contraceptive users’ willingness to select the copper IUD. Contraception 2012; 85(1): 32-35. doi: 10.1016/j. contraception.2011.04.005
Nguyen T, Zaller N. Male access to over-the-counter EC: A survey of acceptability and barriers in Providence, Rhode Island. Women’s Health Issues 2012: 19; 365-372. doi: 10.1016/j. whi.2009.07.003
Vahratian A, Patel A, Wolff K, Xu X. College students’ perceptions of EC provision. Journal of Women’s Health. 2008; 17(1): 103-11. doi: 10.1089/jwh/2007.0391
Corbett O, Mitchell P, Taylor S, Kemppainen J. EC: Knowledge and perceptions in a university population. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2006; 18: 161- 168. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00114x
Foster G, Higgins A, Biggs A, McCain C, Holtby S, Brindis D. Willingness to have unprotected sex. Journal of Sex Research. 2012; 49(1): 61-68. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.572307
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Women's Health (WH) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.