Basic Study for the Quantitative Diagnosis of Edema Focusing on Ultrasound Propagation Time Waveform Information

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Shin-ichi Sakamoto Faculty of Advanced Engineering Science, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan
  • Taiki Godo Graduate School of Engineering, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan
  • Masafumi Koshiyama Faculty of Human Nursing, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan
  • Eri Ikuta Faculty of Human Nursing, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan
  • Yumiko Watanabe Faculty of Human Nursing, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-8-147

Keywords:

Edema; Quantitative diagnosis of edema; Ultrasound; Ultrasound propagation time waveform information

Abstract

Objective
We conducted a research on a simple diagnosis of edema. We aimed to develop a safe and inexpensive method using ultrasound.
Because B-mode imaging systems are expensive and specialized, we focused on the ultrasound propagation time waveform information.
Experiment
Experiments were conducted using a custom-made ultrasonic transducer. Measurements were performed on individuals with
and without edema, and the results are discussed in this paper based on propagation time waveform information and frequency
analysis.
Summary
Based on the results, we found three indices with a high possibility of understanding the state of edema. The first index was
edema thickness, the second was the standard deviation of edema thickness, and the third was the shape of the frequency spectrum of the ultrasound propagation time waveform. The results indicated that the presence of edema can be easily and quickly
determined by determining the thickness of the edema at the measurement point near the ankle (measurement point D) on the
front surface of the lower limbs and performing frequency analyses.

References

Yale HS, Joseph MJ. Approach to diagnosing lower extremity edema. Compr Ther. 2001; 27(3): 242-252. doi: 10.1007/s12019- 001-0021-5

John EW, Jerome OA, Lee CM, Mark EH. Approach to leg ede-ma of unclear etiology. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006; 19(2): 148-160. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.2.148

Watanabe Y, Koshiyama M, Yanagisawa N. Treatment of leg and foot edema in women. Women Health Open J. 2017; 3(2): 69-74. doi: 10.17140/WHOJ-3-124

Brodovicz KG, McNaughton K, Uemura N, Meininger G, Gir-man CJ, Yale SH. Reliability and feasibility of methods to quanti-tatively assess peripheral edema. Clin Med Res. 2009; 7(1-2): 21-31. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2009.819

Straanden E. A comparison between surface measurements and water displacement volumetry for the quantification of leg edema. J Oslo City Hosp. 1981; 31(12): 153-155.

Codognotto M, Piazza M, Frigatti P, Piccoli A. Influence of local-ized edema on whole-body and segmental bioelectrical impedance. Nutrition. 2008; 24(6): 569-574. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.02.009

Yasuo U, Maruo M, Ashitaka Y. Studies on the estimation of ma-ternal body composition by means of bioelectrical impedance anal-ysis and the usefulness of total body water/total body fat value as a parameter for diagnosis of gestational edema. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2002; 28(4): 236-236. doi: 10.1046/j.1341- 8076.2002.00047.x

Szabo TL. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out. London, Eng-land: Academic Press; 2004: 24-25.

Gniadecka M. Localization of dermal edema in lipodermato-sclerosis, lymphedema, and cardiac insufficiency: High-frequency ultrasound examination of intradermal echogenicity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35(1): 37-41. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90493-4

Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, Yamashita O, Samura M, Hamano K. Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2013; 6(2): 180-188. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.12.00102 Brief Research Report | Volume 8 | Number 1 | Sakamoto S, et al

Yabunaka K, Murayama R, Tanabe H, et al. Ultrasonographic classification of subcutaneous edema caused by infusion via pe-ripheral intravenous catheter. Journal of Medical Ultrasound. 2016; 24(2): 60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jmu.2016.02.001

Pragasam S, Kumari R, Munisamy M, Thappa DM. Utility of high-frequency ultrasound in assessing cutaneous edema in venous ulcer patients. Skin Res Technol. 2021; 27(5): 904-908. doi: 10.1111/ srt.13040

Topchyan A, Tatarinov A, Sarvazyan N, Sarvazyan A. Ul-trasound velocity in human muscle in vivo: Perspective for ede-ma studies. Ultrasonics. 2006; 44(3): 259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ul-tras.2006.02.003

Johansen A, Stone MD. The effect of ankle oedema on bone ultrasound assessment at the heel. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(1): 44-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01623459

Hu D, Phan TT, Cherry GW, Ryan TJ. Dermal oedema assessed by high frequency ultrasound in venous leg ulcers. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 138(5): 815-820. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02218.x

Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, et al. Subcutaneous tis-sue ultrasonography in legs with dependent edema and secondary lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2014; 7(1): 21-7. doi: 10.3400/avd. oa.13-00107

Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, et al. A study of leg edema in immobile patients. Circ J. 2014; 78(7): 1733-1739. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1599

Kurihara S, Sakamoto S, Inui K, Watanabe Y, Koshiyama M. Fundamental study of quantitative diagnosis for human edema using ultrasound: Experiments using the agar phantoms with dif-ferent concentrations of moisture. The Institute of Electronics, Infor-mation and Communication Engineers. 2018; 118: 102.

Watanabe Y, Koshiyama M, Seki K, et al. Development and themes of diagnostic and treatment procedures for secondary leg lymphedema in patients with gynecologic cancers. Healthcare (Ba-sel). 2019; 7(3): 101. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7030101

Yanagisawa N, Koshiyama M, Watanabe Y, Sato S, Sakamoto S. A quantitative method to measure skin thickness in leg edema in pregnant women using b-scan portable ultrasonography: A com-parison between obese and non-obese women. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25: 1-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911799

Ikuta E, Watanabe Y, Yanagisawa N, et al. Measurement of women’s leg edema using ultrasonography. Women Health Open J. 2020; 6(1): 5-7. doi: 10.17140/WHOJ-6-136

Ludwig GD. The velocity of sound through tissues and the acoustic impedance of tissues. The Journal of the Acoustical So-ciety of America. 1950; 22(6): 862-866. doi: 10.1121/1.1906706

Jia X, Caroli C, Velicky B. Ultrasound propagation in external-ly stressed granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999; 82(9): 1863. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1863

Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Bi-omed. 2004; 22(6): 229-248. doi: 10.1121/1.1906706

Jeff P, Kremkau F. Medical ultrasound systems. Interface Focus. 2011; 1(4): 477-489. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0027

Brattain LJ, Telfer BA, Dhyani M, Grajo JR, Samir AE. Ma-chine learning for medical ultrasound status, methods, and fu-ture opportunities. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 43(4): 786-799. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1517-0

Gerald H, Gachagan A, Mutasa T. Review of high-power ul-trasound-industrial applications and measurement methods. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014; 61(3): 481-495. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2932

Urick RJ, Ament WS. The propagation of sound in composite media. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1949; 21(2): 115-119. doi: 10.1121/1.1906474

Urick RJ. The absorption of sound in suspensions of irregular particles. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1948; 20(3): 283-289. doi: 10.1121/1.1906373

Biot MA. Theory of elasticity and consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid. Journal of Applied Physics. 1955; 26(2): 182-185. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ doi: 10.1063/1.1721956

Matsukawa M, Sasaki K, Akimoto T, Otani T. Application of a suspension theory to particle-dispersed agarose gels. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2002; 41(5S): 3163. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.41.3163

Ohigashi H. Piezoelectric polymers–materials and manufac-ture. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1985; 24(S2): 23-27.

Thibodeau GA, Patton KT. The Human Body in Health & Disease. 5th ed. Missouri, USA: Mosby; 2019: 136.

Greenspan M, Tschiegg CE. Tables of the speed of sound in water. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1959; 31(1): 75- 76. doi: 10.1121/1.1907614

Beerends RJ, ter Morsche HG, van den Berg JC, van de Vrie EM. Fourier and Laplace Transforms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003: 375-383.

Nagle AS, Cullingsworth ZE, Li R, Carucci LR, Klausner AP, Speich JE. Bladder wall micromotion measured by non-invasive ultrasound: Initial results in women with and without overactive bladder. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2021; 9(1): 44-52.

Kanai H. Propagation of spontaneously actuated pulsive vi-bration in human heart wall and in vivo viscoelasticity estimation. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2005; 52(11): 1931-1942. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561662

Downloads

Published

2022-07-20

How to Cite

Shin-ichi Sakamoto, Taiki Godo, Masafumi Koshiyama, Eri Ikuta, & Yumiko Watanabe. (2022). Basic Study for the Quantitative Diagnosis of Edema Focusing on Ultrasound Propagation Time Waveform Information. Women’s Health, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-8-147

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)