Cesarean Section and Associated Surgeries: Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-3-118Keywords:
Cesarean section; Associated surgeries; Feasibility; OutcomesAbstract
Cesarean section being the most commonly performed surgery in Egypt, the incidents of cesarean delivery in general hospitals were found to be nearly 50.6%, whereas, in private hospitals
such cases were reported to be much higher. Many disorders, either gynecological or non-gynecological could coexist or precede a cesarean delivery. These disorders need to be managed
surgically; invariably most patients will prefer to undergo a cesarean section with concomitant
surgery for any associated pathology. The feasibility and complications of such dual surgeries
have been addressed in this review article.
References
El-Zanaty F. Ministry of Health and Populations [Egypt], ICF International. The 2014 Egypt demographic and Health Survey (2014 EDHS). Main Findings. Cairo, Egypt, 2015.
Exacoustòs C, Rosati P. Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myo-mas and complications in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82(1): 97-101. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90784-6
Ouyang DW, Economy KE, Norwitz ER. Obstetric complica-tions of fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006; 33(1): 153-169.
Spariç R. Intraoperative hemorrhage as a complication of ce-sarean myomectomy: Analysis of risk factors. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016; 73(5): 415-421. doi: 10.2298/VSP141105029S
Tinelli A. Myoma in pregnancy and cesarean myomectomy: A matter of debate for a long time. Int J Gynecol Clin Pract. 2014; 1: 104. doi: 10.15344/2394-4986/2014/104
Incebiyik A, Hilali NG, Camuzcuoglu A, Vural M, Camuzc-uoglu H. Myomectomy during cesarean: A retrospective evalu-ation of 16 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289(3): 569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3019-1
Awoleke JO. Myomectomy during cesarean birth in fibroid-endemic, low-resource settings. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013; 2013: 520834. doi: 10.1155/2013/520834
Simsek Y, Celen S, Danisman N, Mollamahmutoğlu L. Re-moval of uterine fibroids during cesarean section: A difficult therapeutic decision. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(1): 76- 78. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/22675961. Ac-cessed January 3, 2017.
Lee JH, Cho DH. Myomectomy using purse-string suture dur-ing cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 283 Suppl 1: 35-37. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1760-2
Sapmaz E1, Celik H, Altungül A. Bilateral ascending uter-ine artery ligation vs. tourniquet use for hemostasis in cesarean myomectomy. J Reprod Med. 2003; 48(12): 950-954.
Desai BR, Patted SS, Pujar YV, Sherigar BY, Das SR, Ruge JC. A novel technique of selective uterine devascularization before myomectomy at the time of cesarean section: A pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(1): 362-364. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2009.09.027
Holub Z, Lukac J, Kliment L, Urbanek S. Pregnancy out-comes and deliveries following laparoscopic transsection of uterine vessels: A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 125(2): 165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.021
Machado LS, Gowri V, Al-Riyami N, Al-Kharusi L. Cesar-ean myomectomy. Feasibility and safety. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012; 12(2): 190-196.
Hassiakos D, Christopoulos P, Vitoratos N, Xarchoulakou E, Vaggos G, Papadias K. Myomectomy during cesarean section: A safe procedure? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1092: 408-413. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.038
Li H, Du J, Jin L, Shi Z, Liu M. Myomectomy during ce-sarean section. Acta Obstetriciaet Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2009; 88(2):183-186. doi: 10.1080/00016340802635526
Adesiyun AG, Ojabo A, Durosinlorun-Mohammed A. Fer-tility and obstetric outcome after Cesarean myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 28(7): 710-712. doi: 10.1080/01443 610802462712
Ehigiegba AE, Ande AB, Ojobo SI. Myomectomy during ce-sarean section. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 75(1): 21-25.
Song D, Zhang W, Chames MC, Guo J. Myomectomy during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 121(3): 208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.021
Topçu HO, İskender CT, Timur H, Kaymak O, Memur T, Danışman N. Outcomes after cesarean myomectomy versus ce-sarean alone among pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 130(3): 244-246. doi: 10.1016/j. ijgo.2015.03.035
Sparić R, Malvasi A, Tinelli A. Analysis of clinical, bio-logical and obstetric factors influencing the decision to perform cesarean myomectomy. Ginekol Pol. 2015; 86(1): 40-45. doi: 10.17772/gp/1897
Özcan A, Kopuz A, Turan V, et al. Cesarean myomectomy for solitary uterine fibroids: Is it a safe procedure? Ginekol Pol. 2016; 87(1): 54-58. doi: 10.17772/gp/57833
Levi EE, Stuart GS, Zerden ML, Garrett JM, Bryant AG. Intrauterine device placement during cesarean delivery and con-tinued use 6 months postpartum. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; doi: 10.1097/ACOG.0000000000000882
Blumenthal PD, Goldthwaite LM. Intrauterine device place-ment during cesarean delivery: The rising tide of the postdeliv-ery intrauterine device. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(1): 1-2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000944
Alvarez Pelayo J, Borbolla Sala ME. IUD insertion during cesarean section and its most frequent complications. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1994; 62: 330-335. Web site. http://europepmc.org/ abstract/med/7821830. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Halder A, Sowmya MS, Gayen A, Bhattacharya P, Mukher-jee S, Datta S. A prospective study to evaluate vaginal inser-tion and intra-cesarean insertion of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016; 66(1): 35- 41. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0640-2
Çelen Ş, Sucak A, Yıldız Y, Danışman N. Immediate post-placental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device dur-ing cesarean section. Contraception. 2011; 84(3): 240-243. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.006
Ragab A, Hamed HO, Alsammani MA, et al. Expulsion of Nova-T380, multiload 375 and copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 130(2): 174-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.025
Wildemeersch D, Goldstuck ND, Hasskamp T. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion. Dev Period Med. 2016; 20(1): 7-15. Web site. http:// www.pubpdf.com/pub/27416620/Current-status-of-frameless-anchored-IUD-for-immediate-intracesarean-insertion. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Wildemeersch DA, Goldstuck ND. The challenge to solve the expulsion problem of immediate postplacental insertion of IUD. Contraception. 2016; 94(1): 93-94. doi: 10.1016/j.contra-ception.2016.03.012
Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: A systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2013; 5: 811-818. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S53845
Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for con-traception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 6: CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub3
Matsubara S, Takahashi H, Horie K, Lefor AK, Fujiwara H. Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta: Paracervix should be divided sequentially, not en masse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 201: 227-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.047
ACOG. committee opinion no. 529: Placenta accre-ta. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(1): 207-211. doi: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e318262e340
Shellhaas CS, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesar-ean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(2 pt 1): 224-229. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ad9442
Edmonds DK. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gyn-aecology. 8th ed. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
Tewari KS. Cesarean-Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomies. In: Clinical Gynecologic Oncology. 9th ed. Oklahoma, USA: Saunders; 2012: 405-477.
Monk BJ, Montz FJ. Invasive cervical cancer complicat-ing intrauterine pregnancy: Treatment with radical hysterec-tomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 80(2): 199-203. Web site. http:// www.pubpdf.com/pub/1635732/Invasive-cervical-cancer-complicating-intrauterine-pregnancy-treatment-with-radical-hysterectomy. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Verkuyl DA. Sterilisation during unplanned Cesarean sec-tions for women likely to have a completed family-should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources. BJOG. 2002; 109(8): 900-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1471- 0528.2002.99427.x
Ozyer S, Moraloğlu O, Gülerman C, et al. Tubal sterilization during cesarean section or as an elective procedure? Effect on the ovarian reserve. Contraception. 2012; 86(5): 488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.002
Basava L, Roy P, AnushaPriya V, Srirama S. Falope rings or modified pomeroy’s technique for concurrent tubal sterilization. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016; 66 (Suppl 1): 198-201. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0794-6
Swende TZ, Hwande TS. Female sterilization by tubal ligation at Cesarean section in Makurdi, Nigeri. Ann Afr Med. 2010; 9(4): 246-250. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.70965
Mahadevappa K, Prasanna N, Channabasappa RA. Trends of various techniques of tubectomy: A five year study in a tertiary institute. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(1): 4-7. doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2016/16863.7104
Emma S, Kean LH. Routine antenatal management later in pregnancy. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2016; 26(9): 265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2013.07.003
Danis RB, Della Badia CR, Richard SD. Postpartum permanent sterilization: Could bilateral salpingectomy replace bilateral tubal ligation? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23 (6): 928-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.006
FIGO Committee for EthicalAspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Female contraceptive sterilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 115(1): 88-89.
Katherine R, Carolyn W. Comprehensive Gynecology. 1st ed. New York, USA: Elsevier; 2017: 237-257.
Soares LC, Brollo JL. Family planning in Brazil: Why not tubal sterilisation during childbirth? J Med Ethics. 2013; 39(11): 710-712. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101142
Hobeika EM, Usta IM, Ghazeeri GS, Mehio G, Nassar AH. Histopathology of adnexal masses incidentally diagnosed during cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 140(1): 124-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.008
Cengiz H, Kaya C, Ekin M, Yeşil A, Yaşar L. Management of incidental adnexal masses on Cesarean section. Niger Med J. 2012; 53(3): 132-134. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.104381
Baser E, Erkilinc S, Esin S, et al. Adnexal masses encountered during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 123(2): 124-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.015
Cohen-Herriou K, Semal-Michel S, Lucot JP, Poncelet E, Rubod C. Management of ovarian cysts during pregnancy: Lille’s experience and literature review. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013; 41(1): 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.12.001
Wei PL, Keller JJ, Liang HH, Lin HC. Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16(6): 1204-1211. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1858-x
Donkervoort SC, Boerma D. Suspicion of acute appendicitis in the third trimester of pregnancy: Pros and cons of a laparo-scopic procedure. JSLS. 2011; 15(3): 379-383. doi: 10.4293/108 680811X13125733356837
Pearce C, Torres C, Stallings S, et al. Elective appendectomy at the time of cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(5): 491-495. doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2008.03.063
Wasiluk I, Attali A, Manimekalai N, Panni MK. Novel use of a continuous intrathecal catheter for appendectomy following cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012; 21(4): 387-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.06.008
Kraus SF, Abell RD, Schipul AH. Appendectomy at the time of cesarean section. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2003; 96(9): 431- 433. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/14520930. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Cesarean section and appendectomy can be safely combined. Reuters Health. Web site. http://www.thedoctorschannel.com/ view/cesarean-section-and-appendectomy-can-be-safely-combined-3/. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Morgan-Ortiz F, Ortiz-Bojorquez JC, Trapero-Morales M, Urías-Flores H. Prophylactic appendectomy with invagination during cesarean section. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2001; 69: 476- 479. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/11824107. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Marshall JR, John R. Elective appendectomy and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(2): e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.046
Benn TE, Spera CE. Abdominoplasty Combined with Cesar-ean Section: Discussion of the Evidence. Am J Cosm Surg. 2014; 31(4): 260-263. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20004-0_16
Ali A, Essam A. Abdominoplasty combined with cesarean delivery: Evaluation of the practice. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35(1): 80-86. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9563-1
Thabet WN, Hossny AS, Sherif NA. Feasibility of abdomi-noplasty with Cesarean section. Int J Womens Health. 2012; 4: 115-121. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S29362
Gabriele R, Conte M, Izzo L, Basso L. Cesarean section and hernia repair: Simultaneous approach. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010: 36(5): 944-949. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01283.x
Chen Y, Bai J, Guo Y, Zhang G. The simultaneous repair of an Irreducible Diaphragmatic Hernia while carrying out a Ce-sarean Section. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013; 4(9): 771-772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.06.002
Jensen KK, Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN. Abdominal wall hernia and pregnancy: A systematic review. Hernia. 2015; 19(5): 689-696. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1373-6
Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J. Cesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64: 30-35.
Steinemann DC, Limani P, Ochsenbein N, et al. Suture re-pair of umbilical hernia during Cesarean section: A case–control study. Hernia. 2013; 17(4): 521-526. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013- 1087-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Women's Health (WH) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
