Assessing the Occipital Condyles for Age Estimation of Non-Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/ANTPOJ-5-129Keywords:
Age, Non-adult, Occipital condyle, Osteology, Skeletal, Juvenile, Aging, ForensicAbstract
Objectives
New methods for assessing age of non-adult remains are frequently sought to improve the ability to correctly identify individuals in for forensic and archaeological purposes. Especially when faced with comingled remains, it is helpful to have a bone appropriate tool for age estimation. Research was carried out to assess the usefulness of the occipital condyles for aging non-adult individuals using metric and morphology analyses. The research population included occipital condyles, both fused and unfused, of individuals of known age at death non-adult from the from the Hamann-Todd Collection, Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (N=69); Colecção Esqueletos Identificados, Natural History Museum, University of Coimbra, Portugal (N=113); Museu Bocage, National Museum of Natural History, Lisbon, Portugal (N=60). Length and width measurements were taken then regression was used to analyse the datasets. Three morphological factors were observed including, level of fusion at the synchondrosis intraoccipitalis anterior, presence/absence of billows and presence/absence of depressions.
Results
Accuracy based on the metric model ranged between 37-71%. The morphological model showed fusion present as early as 3-years of age, with all non-adults over 8-years showing 100% complete fusion. Only individuals below 13-years of age displayed billows or depressions present; presence not absence of the morphological variables can be used to estimate age with a 92% accuracy rate.
Conclusion
The metric model does not reach an acceptable level of accuracy for use in aging non-adults. Morphology of the occipital condyles do not follow a specific age progression but can be used as a quick age assessment guide; if these morphological features are present the individual very likely between 3-13-years of age.
References
Toneva D, Nikolova S, Harizanov S, et al. Sex estimation by size and shape of the foramen magnum based on CT imaging. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2018; 35: 50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.09.009
Nagaoka T, Kawakubo Y, Hirata K. Estimation of fetal age at death from the basilar part of the occipital bone. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 126: 703-711. doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0718-2
Scheuer L, MacLaughlin-Black S. age estimation from the pars basilaris of the fetal and juvenile occipital bone. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1991; 4: 377-380. doi: 10.1002/oa.1390040412
Redfield A. A new aid to aging immature skeletons: Develop-ment of the occipital bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1970; 33: 207- 220. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330330206
Inskip S, Constantinescu M, Brinkman A, Hoogland M, Sofaer J. The effect of population variation on the accuracy of sex esti-mates derived from basal occipital discriminant functions. Achaeol Anthropol Sci. 2018; 10: 675-683. doi: 10.1007/s12520-016-0380-6
Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the occipital condyle: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nine-teenth century british sample. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009; 138: 384- 394. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20946
Westcott DJ, Moore-Jansen PH. Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci. 2001; 45: 1159-1163. doi: 10.1520/JFS15115J
Williams MM. Sex Determination of Fragmentary Crania by Analysis of the Cranial Base: Applications for the Study of an Arikara Skeletal Sample. [master’s thesis]. Knoxville, TN, USA: University of Ten-nessee; 1987.
Holland TD. Sex determination of fragmentary crania by anal-ysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986a; 70: 203-208. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330700207
Holland TD. Race determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. J Forensic Sci. 1986b; 31: 719-725. doi: 10.1520/JFS12305J
Dudar JC, Castillo ER. Quantification of anatomical variation at the atlanto-occipital articulation: Morphometric resolution of commingled human remains within the repatriation documenta-tion process. J Anat. 2016; 1-16. doi: 10.1111/joa.12561
Ramamoorthy B, Pai MM, Prabhu LV, Muralimanju BV, Rai R. Assessment of craniometric traits in south indian dry skulls for sex determination. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016; 37: 8-14. doi: 10.1016/j. jflm.2015.10.001
Veroni A, Dejana N, Schillaci MA. Brief communication: Sex-ual dimorphism of the juvenile basicranium. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010; 141: 147-151. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21156
Günay Y, Altmkök M. The value of the size of foramen mag-num in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med. 2000; 7: 147e9. doi: 10.1054/jcfm.2000.0430
Madadin M, Menezes RG, Al Saif HS, et al. Hamann-todd col-lection aging studies: Osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989; 80: 461-479. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800406
Ekizoglu O, Hocaoglu E, Inci E, et al. Assessment of sex in modern turkish population using cranial anthropometric pa-rameters. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016; 21: 45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.le-galmed.2016.06.001
Kranioti EF, Işcan MY, Michalodimitrakis M. Craniometric analysis of the modern cretan population. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 180: 110.e1-110e5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.018
Steyn M, Işcan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and man-dibles of south african whites. Forensic Sci Int. 1998; 98(1): 9-16. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(98)00120-0
AlQahtani SJ, Hector MP, Liversidge HM. Accuracy of den-tal estimation charts: Schour and Massler, Ubelaker, and the Lon-don atlas. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014; 154: 70-78. doi: 10.1002/ ajpa.22473
Hillson S. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Press; 1996.
Ubelaker DH. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, In-terpretation (Aldine Manuals on Archeology). Oxford, England: Aldine Publishing Company; 1978.
Schour L, Massler M. The development of the human denti-tion. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941; 28: 1153-1160.
Kamnikar KR, Herrman NP, Plemons AM. New approaches to juvenile age estimation in forensics: Application of transition analysis via the shackelford et al. method to a diverse modern sub-adult sample. Hum Biol. 2018; 90(1): 1-20. doi: 10.13110/human-biology.90.1.06
Liversidge HM. Controversies in age estimation from de-veloping teeth. Ann Hum Biol. 2015; 42(4): 395-404. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1044468
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner J. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973; 45(2): 211-217.
Moorrees C, Fanning E, Hunt E. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963; 42(6): 1490-1502. doi: 10.1177/00220345630420062701
Ubelaker D. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, In-terpretation. 3rd ed. Washington D.C, USA: Transaction Publishers; 1999.
Bass W. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. (Special Publication No. 2 of the Missouri Archaeological Society). 5th ed. Springfield, MO, USA: Missouri Archaeological Society; 2005.
Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Paper presented at: The Field Museum of Natural History. Arkansas Archaeological Survey; 1994; Fayette-ville, AR, USA.
Fazekas IG., Kósa F. Forensic Fetal Osteology. Kiado, Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó; 1978.
Rissech C, López-Costas O, Turbón D. Humeral development from neonatal period to skeletal maturity – application in age and sex assessment. Int J Legal Med. 2013; 127: 201-212. doi: 10.1007/ s00414-012-0713-7
Cardoso HFV, Gomes J, Campanacho V, Marinho L. Age esti-mation of immature human skeletal remains using the post-nasal development of the occipital bone. Int J Legal Med. 2013; 127: 997- 1004. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0818-7
Alfonso-Durruty MP, Thompson JT. Basiocciput age at death estimation assessment in subadults from punta teatinos, chile. An-thropologie. 2011; XLIX(2): 125-132.
Tocheri MW, Molto JE. Aging fetal juvenile skeletons from ro-man period egypt using basiocciput osteometrics. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2002; 12: 356-363. doi: 10.1002/oa.634
Standerwick RG, Roberts EW, Hartsfield Jr JK, Babler WJ, Katona TR. Comparison of the bolton standards to longitudinal cephalograms superimposed on the occipital condyle (I-point). J Orthod. 2009; 36: 23-35. doi: 10.1179/14653120722896
Uysal S, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosar U. Esti-mation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50: 1310-1314. doi: 10.1520/JFS2005058
Cameron N, Demerath E. Critical periods of growth and their relation to diseases of aging. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 45: 159- 184. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10183
Ellison P. Evolutionary perspective on the fetal origins hy-pothesis. Am J Human Biol. 2005; 17(1): 113-118. doi: 10.1002/ ajhb.20097
Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Pryzbeck TR, Mensforth RP. Chron-ological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985; 68: 15-28. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680103
Todd TW. Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The male white pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1921a; 3: 285-334. doi: 10.1002/ ajpa.1330030301
Todd TW. Age Changes in the Pubic Bone. II: The Pubis Retrospective Study | Volume 5 | Number 2 | Madden GD, et al of the Male Negro-White Hybrid, III: The Pubis of the White Female. IV: The Pubis of the Female Negro-White Hybrid. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1921b; 4: 517-549. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
Brooks S, Suchey JM. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the acsadi-nemeskeri and such-ey-brooks methods. Hum Evol. 1990; 5: 227-238. doi: 10.1007/ BF02437238
Işcan MY, Loth SR. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white males: A test of the phase method. J Forensic Sci. 1986a; 31: 122-132. doi: 10.1520/JFS11866J
Işcan MY, Loth SR. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white females: A test of the phase method. J Forensic Sci. 1986b; 31: 990-999.
Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Collections and Data-bases. http://www.cmnh.org/. Accessed February 1, 2022.
Rocha MA. Les collections ostéologiques humaines identifiées du musée anthropologique de l’université de Comimbra. Anthropo-logia Portuguesa. 1995; 13: 7-38.
Cardoso HFV, Abrantes J, Humphrey LT. Age estimation of immature human skeletal remains from the diaphyseal length of long bones in the postnatal period. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 128: 809- 824. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0925-5
Jamaiyah H, Geeta A, Safiza MN, et al. Reliability, technical error of measurements and validity of length and weight measure-ments for children under two years old in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2010; 65( Suppl A): 131-137.
Stomfai S, Ahrens W, Bammann K, et al. Intra- and inter-ob-server reliability in anthropometric measurements in children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011; 35: S45–S51. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.34
Johnston FE. Growth of the long bones of infants and young children at Indian Knoll. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1962; 20(3): 249-254. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330200309
Coqueugniot H, Weaver TD. Brief communication: Infracra-nial maturation in the skeletal collection from coimbra, portugal: New aging standards for epiphyseal union. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007; 134: 424-437. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20683
Cardoso HFV. Brief communication: The collection of iden-tified human skeletons housed at the Bocage Museum (National Museum of Natural History), Lisbon, Portugal. Am J Phys An-thropol. 2006; 129: 173-176. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20228
Mensforth RP, Latimer BM. Hamann-todd collection aging studies: Osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989; 80(4): 461-479. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800406
de la Cova C. Patterns of trauma and violence in 19th-centu-ry-born African American and Euro-American females. Int J Paleo-pathol. 2012; 2(2-3): 61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2012.09.009
Lampl M, Johnston FE. Problems in the aging of skeletal juve-niles: Perspectives from maturation assessments of living children. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996; 101: 345-355. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 8644(199611)101:3<345:AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-Y Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Muller JL, Pearlstein KE, de la Cova C. Dissection and docu-mented skeletal collections: Embodiments of legalized inequality. In: Nystrom KC, ed. The Bioarchaeology of Dissection and Autopsy in the United States, Bioarchaeology and Social Theory. New York, USA: Springer; 2017: 185-201.
Daubert v. Merrel dow pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579. 1993. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/. Accessed , 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Anthropology is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
