The Identification of Pregnant Women at Risk for Child Abuse: Methodology

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Jamila Mejdoubi Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Re-search, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Silvia Van den Heijkant Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Re-search, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Elle Struijf GGD Hollands Noorden, Schagen, The Netherlands
  • Frank Van Leerdam Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Alfons Crijnen De Waag, Center for Forensic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Remy HiraSing Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Re-search, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-2-105

Keywords:

Child abuse, Patient selection, Risk factors, Home care services, Primary prevention, Randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background: The prevention of child abuse should starts as early as possible in the life of children living in families at risk for abuse. We describe a two-stage selection procedure to identify those pregnant women who are at risk for child abuse. The procedure was developed to guide these mothers to VoorZorg, the Dutch adaptation of the Nurse-Family Partnership program.
Methods: In the first stage of the selection, professionals, most often midwives, apply five inclusion criteria: maximum age of 25 years, low educational level, maximum gestational age of 28 weeks, no previous live births and understanding of the Dutch language. In the second stage, trained nurses interview the selected pregnant women by applying a checklist with risk factors for child abuse. To identify the appropriateness of the two-stage selection procedure trained interviewers measured risk behaviour of the selected participants with validated questionnaires.
Results: 460 high risk pregnant women were selected through the two-stage selection procedure. The prevalence of risk factors for child abuse in this sample is: single parent: 76%, drug or alcohol use: 25%, history of abuse: 50%, no current job and/or education: 74%. In total, 98% of the selected women had ≥ 4 risk factors for child abuse.
Conclusions: The two-stage selection procedure adequately identifies pregnant women with multiple risk factors for child abuse.

References

Felitti VJ. Adverse childhood experiences and adult health. Acad Pediatr. 2009; 9: 131-132.

Springer KW, Sheridan J, Kuo D, Carnes M. Long-term physical and mental health consequences of childhood physi-cal abuse: Results from a large population-based sample of men and women. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2007; 31: 517-530. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.01.003

Mills R, Alati R, O’Callaghan M, et al. Child abuse and neglect and cognitive function at 14 years of age: Findings from a birth cohort. Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 4-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009- 3479

Euser EM, van Ijzendoorn MH, Prinzie P, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Prevalence of child maltreatment in The Netherlands. Child Maltreat. 2010; 15: 5-17. doi: 10.1177/1077559509345904

Klevens J, Whitaker DJ. Primary prevention of child physical abuse and neglect: gaps and promising directions. Child Mal-treat. 2007; 12: 364-377. doi: 10.1177/1077559507305995

Olds DL, Robinson J, O’Brien R, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002; 110: 486-496. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.486

Peters P, Barlow J. Systematic review of instruments designed to predict child maltreatment during the antenatal and postnatal periods. Child Abuse Review. 2003; 12: 416-439.

Wilson LM, Reid AJ, Midmer DK, Biringer A, Carroll JC, Stewart DE. Antenatal psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse postpartum family outcomes. CMAJ. 1996; 154: 785- 799.

McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18: 156-170. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156

Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Tatelbaum R, Chamberlin R. Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of preg-nancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986; 77: 16-28.

Berlin LJ, Appleyard K, Dodge KA. Intergenerational conti-nuity in child maltreatment: Mediating mechanisms and impli-cations for prevention. Child development. 2011; 82: 162-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01547.x

Begle AM, Dumas JE. Child and parental outcomes follow-ing involvement in a preventive intervention: Efficacy of the PACE program. The journal of primary prevention. 2011; 32: 67-81. doi: 10.1007/s10935-010-0232-6

Milner JS, Crouch JL. Assessment of maternal attributions of infant’s hostile intent and its use in child maltreatment pre-vention/intervention efforts. JAMA pediatrics. 2013; 167: 588- 589. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1467

Berlin LJ, Dodge KA, Reznick JS. Examining pregnant women’s hostile attributions about infants as a predictor of offspring maltreatment. JAMA pediatrics. 2013; 167: 549-553. (doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1212

Mejdoubi J, van den Heijkant S, Struijf E, van Leerdam F, HiraSing R, Crijnen A. Addressing risk factors for child abuse among high risk pregnant women: design of a randomised controlled trial of the nurse family partnership in Dutch pre-ventive health care. BMC public health 2011; 11(1): 823. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-823

McFarlane JM, Groff JY, O’Brien JA, Watson K. Prevalence of partner violence against 7,443 African American, White, and Hispanic women receiving care at urban public primary care clinics. Public Health Nurs. 2005; 22: 98-107. doi: 10.1111/ j.0737-1209.2005.220203.x

Stolper E, Van de Wiel M, Van Royen P, Van Bokhoven M, Van der Weijden T, Dinant GJ. Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners’ diagnostic reasoning. Journal of general internal medicine. 2011; 26(2): 197-203. doi: 10.1007/s11606- 010-1524-5

Adouard F, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NMC, Golse B. Vali-dation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Ar-chives of Womens Mental Health. 2005; 8: 89-95.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-05

How to Cite

Jamila Mejdoubi, Silvia Van den Heijkant, Elle Struijf, Frank Van Leerdam, Alfons Crijnen, & Remy HiraSing. (2015). The Identification of Pregnant Women at Risk for Child Abuse: Methodology. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 2(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-2-105

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015): Volume 2 Issue 1 2015

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All content published in Gynecology and Obstetrics Research (GOR) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.