Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma – The Clinical Challenge

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Khadija Warfa Gynecologic Oncology Fellow, University of Calgary & Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Martin Köbel Gynecologic Pathologist, Calgary laboratory services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Prafull Ghatage Gynecologic Oncologist, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Gregg Nelson Gynecologic Oncologist, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-2-108

Keywords:

Low-grade serous carcinoma, High-grade serous carcinoma, Ovarian cancer

Abstract

Low-grade serous carcinoma is one of the five major histological types of ovarian carcinoma associated with a specific biology. We reviewed three cases from our institution to demonstrate the variable clinical course and provide a brief review on this disease entity.

References

Burks RT, Sherman ME, Kurman RJ. Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. A distinctive low-grade carcinoma relat-ed to serous borderline tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996; 20(11): 1319-1330.

Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed; MD, USA: WHO, IARC; 2014: 6.

Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Lee S, et al. Biomarker-based ovar-ian carcinoma typing: a histologic investigation in the ovarian tumor tissue analysis consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark-ers Prev. 2013; 22(10): 1677-1686. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965. EPI-13-0391

Sieh W, Köbel M, Longacre TA, et al. Hormone-receptor ex-pression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(9): 853-862. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70253-5

Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcino-mas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010; 29(3): 203-211. doi: 10.1097/ PGP.0b013e3181c042b6

Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 2004; 164(5): 1511-1518. doi: 10.1016/S0002- 9440(10)63708-X

Singer G, Oldt R 3rd, Cohen Y, et al. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95(6): 484-486. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.6.484

Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carci-noma of the ovary. J Pathol. 2010; 221(1): 49-56. doi: 10.1002/ path.2696

Altman AD, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, et al. The diagnostic utility of TP53 and CDKN2A to distinguish ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma from low-grade serous ovarian tumors. Mod Pathol. 2013; 26(9): 1255-1263. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.55

Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al. Grading ovarian se-rous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(4): 496-504.

Helland A, Anglesio MS, George J, et al. Deregulation of MYCN, LIN28B and LET7 in a molecular subtype of aggres-sive high-grade serous ovarian cancers. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4): e18064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018064

Jones S, Wang TL, Kurman RJ, et al. Low-grade serous car-cinomas of the ovary contain very few point mutations. J Pathol. 2012; 226(3): 413-420. doi: 10.1002/path.3967

Tsang YT, Deavers MT, Sun CC, et al. KRAS (but not BRAF) mutations in ovarian serous borderline tumor are associated with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. J Pathol. 2013; 231(4): 449-456. doi: 10.1002/path.4252

Diaz-Padilla I, Malpica AL, Minig L, Chiva LM, Gershen-son DM, Gonzalez-Martin A. Ovarian low-grade serous carci-noma: a comprehensive update. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 126(2): 279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.029

Longacre TA, McKenney JK, Tazelaar HD, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant po-tential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29(6): 707-723.

May T, Virtanen C, Sharma M, et al. Low malignant poten-tial tumors with micropapillary features are molecularly simi-lar to low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 117(1): 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.006

Silva EG, Deavers MT, Malpica A. Patterns of low-grade serous carcinoma with emphasis on the nonepithelial-lined spaces pattern of invasion and the disorganized orphan papil-lae. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010; 29(6): 507-512. doi: 10.1097/ PGP.0b013e3181e31f74

Djordjevic B, Malpica A. Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with nodal low-grade serous carcino-ma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012; 36(7): 955-963. doi: 10.1097/ PAS.0b013e31825793e1

Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Isonishi S, et al. Long-term results of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin versus conventional pa-clitaxel and carboplatin for treatment of advanced epithelial ovar-ian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (JGOG 3016): a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(10): 1020-1026. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70363-2

Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al. Neoadjuvant che-motherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peri-toneum. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 108(3): 510-514. doi: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2007.11.013

Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D, et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemore-sistant. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114(1): 48-52. doi: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2009.03.001

Gershenson DM, The life and times of low-grade serous car-cinoma of the ovary. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013; 195- 199. doi: 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e195

Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al. Clinical behav-ior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108(2): 361-368. doi: 10.1097/01. AOG.0000227787.24587.d1

Hannibal CG, Vang R, Junge J, Kjaerbye-Thygesen A, Kurman RJ, Kjaer SK. A binary histologic grading system for ovarian serous carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor: a population-based study of 4317 women diagnosed in Den-mark 1978-2006. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 125(3): 655-660. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.028

Ali RH, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, Swenerton KD, Gilks CB. Stage II to IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary is associat-ed with a poor prognosis: a clinicopathologic study of 32 patients from a population-based tumor registry. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013; 32(6): 529-535. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31827630eb

Köbel M, Bak J, Bertelsen BI, et al. Ovarian carcinoma his-totype determination is highly reproducible, and is improved through the use of immunohistochemistry. Histopathology. 2014; 64: 1004-1013. doi: 10.1111/his.12349

Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Iyer RB, et al. Hormonal therapy for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peri-toneum. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 125(3): 661-666. doi: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2012.02.037

Escobar J, Klimowicz AC, Dean M, et al. Quantifica-tion of ER/PR expression in ovarian low-grade serous carci-noma. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 128(2): 371-376. doi: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2012.10.013

Wong KK, Lu KH, Malpica A, et al. Significantly greater expression of ER, PR, and ECAD in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma as revealed by immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2007; 26(4): 404-409.

Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V, et al. Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lan-cet Oncol. 2013; 14(2): 134-140. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045- (12)70572-7

FaderAN, Java J, KrivakTC, et al.The prognostic significance of pre- and post-treatment CA-125 in grade 1 serous ovarian car-cinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 132(3): 560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.016

Downloads

Published

2015-05-11

How to Cite

Khadija Warfa, Martin Köbel, Prafull Ghatage, & Gregg Nelson. (2015). Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma – The Clinical Challenge. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 2(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-2-108