Optimized Letrozole Dose Versus Traditional Use of Clomiphene Citrate for Ovulation Induction in Patients With PCOS: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Reham R. Elkhateeb MRCOG, MD Senior Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Minia University, Minia, Al Minya, Egypt
  • Ahmad Mahran MRCOG, MD Senior Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Minia University, Minia, Al Minya, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-128

Keywords:

Polycystic ovary syndrome, Letrozole, Clomiphene citrate, Ovulation induction

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of gradually increased letrozole dose in versus Clomiphene Citrate (CC) (100 mg) for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: IVF unit at Minia Maternity University Hospital in Egypt.
Patient(s): Two hundred infertile women with PCOS defined according to Revised Rotterdam criteria.
Intervention(s): patients were randomly allocated into two groups; study group (100 patients) receiving gradually increased doses of letrozole starting with 2.5 mg on cycle day 3 with incremental increase of 2.5 mg daily till reaching a dose of 10 mg daily on cycle day 6 and a control group (100 patients) receiving CC at a dose of 100 mg daily for 5 days starting from cycle day 3. Patients were followed up for three treatment cycles. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate and the secondary outcome was number of mature follicles, endometrial thickness, serum progesterone and time to reach a dominant follicle.
Result(s): The two groups were similar in the demographic features and baseline hormonal milieu. There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards the number of mature follicles and the time to reach mature follicles. Endometrial thickness on HCG day was significantly higher in the letrozole group as compared with CC group (10.1±0.22 mm vs 8.2±0.69 mm, p=0.01)). Serum progesterone was higher in letrozole group than in CC group (19.3±3.1 vs 15.3±2.2, p<0.01). Ovulation was achieved in165/242 cycles (68.2 %) in the letrozole group and 169/249 cycles (67.9 %) in the CC group which was not statistically significant. Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in letrozole group in comparison with CC group (14.8 % vs 10.4 %, p<0.01).
Conclusion(s): Letrozole in gradually increased dose achieves higher clinical pregnancy rate as compared with the traditional dose of CC. Therefore, it can be used as a first-line treatment for ovulation induction in women with PCOS.

References

Kovacs G, Wood C. The current status of polycystic ovary syndrome. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 41(1): 65-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01296.x

Slowey MJ. Polycystic ovary syndrome: new perspective on an old problem. South Med J. 2001; 94(1): 190-195. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/11235033. Accessed April 14, 2016

Thompson LA, Barratt CL, Thornton SJ, Bolton AE, Cooke ID. The effects of clomiphene citrate and cyclofenil on cervi-cal mucus volume and receptivity over the periovulatory period. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59(1): 125-129. Web site. http://europepmc. org/abstract/med/8419199. Accessed April 14, 2016

Kousta E, White DM, Franks S. Modern use of clomiphene ci-trate in induction of ovulation. Hum Reprod Update. 1997; 3(4): 359-365. doi: 10.1093/humupd/3.4.359

Pfister CU, Martoni A, Zamagni C, Lelli G, De Braud F, Soup-part C. Effect of age andsingle versus multiple doses, pharmaco-kinetic of letrozole (Femara) in breast cancerpatients. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2001; 22(5): 191-197. doi: 10.1002/bdd.273

Naftolin F, MacLusky NJ. Aromatization hypothesis revisited. In: Serio M, ed. Differentiation: basic and clinical aspects. New York, USA: Raven Press; 1984: 79-91.

Naftolin F, MacLusky NJ, Leranth CZ, Sakamoto HS, Gar-cia-Segura LM. The cellular effects of estrogens on neuroendo-crine tissues. J Steroid Biochem. 1988; 30(1-6): 195-207. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(88)90093-3

Naftolin F. Brain aromatization of androgens. J Reprod Med. 1994; 39(4): 257-261. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/8040841. Accessed April 14, 2016

Roberts V, Meunier H, Vaughan J, et al. Production and regu-lation of inhibin subunits in pituitary gonadotropes. Endocrinol-ogy. 1989; 124(1): 552-554. doi: 10.1210/endo-124-1-552

The Rptterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(1): 41-47. doi: 10.1093/hum-rep/deh098

World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010: 271.

Requena A, Herrero J, Landeras J, et al. Use of letrozole in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2008; 14(6): 571-582. doi: 10.1093/hu-mupd/dmn033

Begum MR, Begum A. Letrozolevs clomiphene citrate in induction of ovulation in polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD). Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(3): S408.

Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Single-dose administration of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(1): 229-231. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.952

Cortinez A, De Carvalho I, Vantman D, Gabler F, Iniguez G, Vega M. Hormonal profile and endometrial morphology in letrozole-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ovulatory infer-tile patients. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(1): 110-115. doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2004.05.099

Holzer H, Casper R, Tulandi T. A new era in ovulation in-duction. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(2): 277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2005.05.078

Al-Fozan H, Al-Khadouri M, Tan SL, Tulandi T. A random-ized trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in women un-dergoing super ovulation. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(6): 1561-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.070

Tulandi T, DeCherney AH. Limiting access to letrozole-is it justified? Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(4): 779-780. doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2007.01.115

Mitwally MF, T Said, A Galal, et al. Letrozole step-up pro-tocol: a successful superovulation protocol. fertil steril. 2008; 89(4): S23-S24. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.071

Rahmani E, Ahmadi S, Motamed N, Maneshi HO. Dos-age optimization for letrozole treatment in clomiphene-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective inter-ventional study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012; 2012: 758508. doi: 10.1155/2012/758508

Mitwally M, Casper R. Use of aromatase inhibitor for ovula-tion induction in patientswith an inadequate response to clomi-phene citrate. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(2): 305-309. doi: 10.1016/ S0015-0282(00)01705-2

Gonen Y, Casper RF. Sonographic determination of a possi-ble adverse effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial growth. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5(6): 670-674. Web site. http://humrep.ox-fordjournals.org/content/5/6/670.long. Accessed April 14, 2016

Yagel S, Ben-Chetrit A, Anteby E, Zacut D, Hochner-Cel-nikier D, Ron M. The effect ofethinyl estradiol on endometrial thickness and uterine volume during ovulation induction by clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57(1): 33-36. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1730327. Accessed April 14, 2016

Mitwally M, Biljan M, Casper R. Pregnancy outcome af-ter the use of an aromataseinhibitor for ovarian stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192(2): 381-386. doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2004.08.013

Kilic-Okman T, Kucuk M, Altaner S. Comparison of the effects of letrozole andclomiphene citrate on ovarian follicles, endometrium, and hormone levels in the rat. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(6): 1330-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.05.002

Bishai R, Arbour L, Lyons C, Koren G. Intrauterine exposure to clomiphene andneonatal persistent hyperplastic primary vitre-ous. Teratology. 1999; 60(3): 143-145. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 9926(199909)60:3<143::AID-TERA9>3.0.CO;2-# Gynecol Obstet Res Open J Page 12

Downloads

Published

2016-05-19

How to Cite

Reham R. Elkhateeb, & Ahmad Mahran. (2016). Optimized Letrozole Dose Versus Traditional Use of Clomiphene Citrate for Ovulation Induction in Patients With PCOS: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 3(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-128