Placental Retention with Accreta in a Uterine Anomaly

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Solwayo Ngwenya Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Head of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mpilo Central Hospital, Vera Road; Founder and Chief Executive Officer Royal Women’s Clinic, 52A Cecil Avenue, Hillside, Bulawayo, Matabeleland, Zimbabwe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-130

Keywords:

Retained placenta, Uterine anomalies, Life-threatening, Catastrophic haemorrhage, Reproductive outcomes, Maternal mortality

Abstract

A 32 year-old P1G2 went into spontaneous labour at 37 weeks gestation. Precipitate labour progressed to a normal vaginal delivery (NVD) of a baby boy within 2 hours of onset. She had a retained placenta. The patient was taken to theatre for an examination under anaesthesia and manual removal of placenta. It was discovered that she had uterine anomaly. A calcified accretic placenta was manually removed. The patient was kept on an oxytocin infusion overnight and given intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics. She made a good recovery and was discharged home after 3 days on oral antibiotics.

References

Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies: How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med. 1998; 43(10): 877-887. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/9800671. Accessed June 12, 2016

Zhang Y, Zhao YY, Qiao J. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(4): 418-422. Web site. http://124.205.33.103:81/ch/reader/view_ab-stract.aspx?file_no=201022059246370&flag=1. Accessed June 12, 2016

Wilson TM. Retained placenta incarcerated in the rudimentary horn of a double uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955; 70(3): 669- 671. Web site. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13238517. Accessed June 12, 2016

Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J, Spinnato JA. Ab-normal placentation: Evidence-based diagnosis and manage-ment of placenta previa, placenta accrete, and vasa previa. Ob-stet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67(8): 503-519. doi: 10. 1097/OGX. Ob013e3182685870

Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anoma-lies. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(10): 2277-2281. doi: 10.1093/hum-rep/12.10.2277

Ma S, Bian X, Lang J. Pregnancy and its outcome in wom-en with malformed uterus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001; 81(7): 415-417. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/11798909. Accessed June 12, 2016

Hiersch L, Yeoshoua E, Miremberg H, et al. The association between mullerian anomalies and short-term pregnancy out-come. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(16): 2573-2578. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1098613

Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(6): 558.e1-558.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022

Pal K, Majumdar S, Mukhopadhyay S. Rupture of rudimen-tary uterine horn pregnancy at 37 weeks geststion with fetal survival. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274(5): 325-326. doi:

1007/s00404-006-0170-y 10. Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19(3): 229-237. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b0649 Gynecol Obstet Res Open J Page 18

Downloads

Published

2016-07-18

How to Cite

Solwayo Ngwenya. (2016). Placental Retention with Accreta in a Uterine Anomaly. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 3(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-130