Robot Assisted Comprehensive Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer: A Validation Study

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Nitin A. Wadhwa Catholic Health Services, Long Island, 1000 Montauk Highway West Islip, NY 11795, USA
  • Dennis Mauricio Catholic Health Services, Long Island, 1000 Montauk Highway West Islip, NY 11795, USA
  • Isabel Eisner Catholic Health Services, Long Island, 1000 Montauk Highway West Islip, NY 11795, USA
  • Ruchi K. Wadhwa Catholic Health Services, Long Island, 1000 Montauk Highway West Islip, NY 11795, USA
  • Pankaj Singhal Catholic Health Services, Long Island, 1000 Montauk Highway West Islip, NY 11795, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-6-151

Keywords:

Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 33, Robotic, Surgery, Uterine cancer, Lymph nodes, Trends

Abstract

Objective
The study sought to evaluate the historical surgical-pathological trends in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 33 in a cohort of patients who underwent robot-assisted staging of uterine carcinomas.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective study from June 2016 through December 2018 at Catholic Health Services Hospitals in Long Island (CHSLI), NY, USA. All patients underwent robotic surgical staging with hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Fifty patients were included, and patients were separated into cohorts with endometrioid or non-endometrioid histology for analysis. Patients were staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 classification.
Results
For all patients undergoing surgical staging, the rate of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastases occurred at 10% and 8%, respectively. Sixty percent of the grade 1 endometrioid tumors had less than 50% myometrial invasion. No patients had positive para aortic lymph nodes in the absence of pelvic node involvement. High-risk histologies were associated with nodal disease thirteen percent of the time. A correlation between increasing depth of invasion and positive lymph nodes was demonstrated. Increasing grade of tumors was correlated with the frequency of nodal metastasis. Intraperitoneal spread was highly correlated to metastatic lymph nodes. Deep invasion was positively correlated with nodal disease.
Conclusion
The results of this study validate the trends previously known from GOG 33 in a population undergoing robot-assisted surgical staging for uterine carcinomas.

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(1): 7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387

Sullivan SA, Rossi EC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endome-trial cancer: A new standard of care? Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017; 18(10): 62. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0503-z

Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987; 60: 2035-2041. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<2035::aid-cncr2820601515>3.0.co;2-8

Mori KM, Neubauer NL. Minimally invasive surgery in gyne-cologic oncology. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 2013: 312982. doi: 10.1155/2013/312982

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(32): 5331-5336. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248

Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, et al., A comparison of sen-tinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES Trial): A multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(3): 384-392. doi: 10.1016/S1470- 2045(17)30068-2

Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 109(1): 11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.023

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparoto-my for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gyne-cologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(7): Original Research | Volume 6 | Number 1| 695-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645

Corrado G, Vizza E, Cela V, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endome-trial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44(12): 1935-1941. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.021

Nieto VL, Huang Y, Hou JY, et al. Use and outcomes of mini-mally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid en-dometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 463.e1-463.e12. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Original Research | Volume 6 | Number 1| Wadhwa NA et al doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.028

Raventós-Tato RM, de la Torre-Fernández de Vega J, Sánchez-Iglesias JL, et al. Surgical approaches in women with endometrial cancer with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2. J Obstet Gyn-aecol Res. 2019; 45(1): 195-202. doi: 10.1111/jog.13789

Chi D, Berchuck A, Dizon DS, Yashar CM, et al. Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-19

How to Cite

Nitin A. Wadhwa, Dennis Mauricio, Isabel Eisner, Ruchi K. Wadhwa, & Pankaj Singhal. (2019). Robot Assisted Comprehensive Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer: A Validation Study. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 6(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-6-151