Short-term Cardio-Vascular Risk Score Changes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Empaglifozin: A Real-Life Clinical Experience

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Alessandra Fusco
  • Sara Colarusso
  • Marco Piscopo
  • Maria Rosaria Improta
  • Marco Corigliano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/HROJ-4-141

Keywords:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), Cardiovascular risk, Cardiovascular risk (CVR), SGLT2i; Empaglifozin; Adverse effects

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to test both efficacy and safety of empaglifozin in type 2
diabetic out patients followed-up within a single institution.
Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients treated with empaglifozin
for 6 months were compared to 356 fully matched control patients on alternative drugs:
side effects were monitored and changes from baseline were evaluated for body weight, body
mass index (BMI), blood pressure, circulating glucose, HbA1c, uric acid, triglycerides, total,
high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels, as well
as creatinine clearance rate. The 10-year Cardiovascular Risk score (10-y CV-RS) was also
assessed in all patients according to the cryogenic underground observatory for rare events
(CUORE) calculation charts. Weight, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as,
HbA1c, glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride and uric acid levels, significantly decreased after
treatment, along with the 10-y CV-RS which is in fact strongly related to the above.
Results: Virtually no changes were observed in creatinine clearance rate and HDL levels. 45%
patients reported polyuria, 15% genital itching, 8% genital infections, 12% urinary tract infections,
no volume depletion or keto-acidosis episodes were described.
Conclusion: In conclusion, in diabetic patients experiencing no previous major cardiovascular
events, empaglifozin significantly improved all cardiovascular risk factors, including glucose
control, and the 10-y CV-RS. Moreover it was well tolerated, so that no treatment discontinuation
was needed even in case of urinary tract infections.

References

Bakris GL, Fonseca VA, Sharma K, Wright EM. Renal so-dium-glucose transport: Role in diabetes mellitus and potential clinical implications. Kidney Int. 2009; 75(12): 1272-1277. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.87

Oku A, Ueta K, Arakawa K, et al. T-1095, an inhibitor of re-nal Na+-glucose cotransporters, may provide a novel approach to treating diabetes. Diabetes. 1999; 48(9): 1794-1800. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.9.1794

Neumiller JJ, White JR Jr, Campbell RK. Sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors: Progress and therapeutic potential in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2010; 70(4): 377-385. doi: 10.2165/11318680-000000000-00000

Abdul-Ghani MA, Norton L, Defronzo RA. Role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT 2) inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Rev. 2011; 32(4): 515-531. doi: 10.1210/ er.2010-0029

Bailey CJ. Renal glucose reabsorption inhibitors to treat dia-betes. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011; 32(2): 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j. tips.2010.11.011

Heise T, Seewaldt-Becker E, Macha S, Hantel S, Pinnetti S. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynam-ics following 4 weeks’ treatment with empagliflozin once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013; 15(7): 613-621. doi: 10.1111/dom.12073

Whalen K, Miller S, Onge ES. The Role of Sodium-Glu-cose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Ther. 2015; 7(6): 1150-1166. doi: 10.1016/j. clinthera.2015.03.004

Defronzo RA, Davidson JA, Del Prato S. The role of the kidneys in glucose homeostasis: A new path towards normal-izing glycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012; 14(1): 5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01511.x

Monami M, Dicembrini I, Mannucci E. Effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on mortality and cardiovascular events: A comprehen-sive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabe-tol. 2017; 54(1): 19-36. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0892-7

Mazidi M, Rezaie P, Gao HK, Kengne AP. Effect of so-dium-glucose cotransport-2 inhibitors on blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 randomized control trials with 22 528 pa-tients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(6)pii: e004007. doi: 10.1161/ JAHA.116.004007

Johnsson KM, Ptaszynska A, Schmitz B, Sugg J, Parikh SJ, List JF. Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes treated with dapagliflozin. J Diabetes Complications. 2013; 27(5): 473- 478. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.05.004

Nicolle LE, Capuano G, Fung A, Usiskin K. Urinary tract infection in randomized Phase III studies of canagliflozin, a so-dium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. Postgrad Med. 2014; 126(1): 7-17. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.01.2720

Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, car-diovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(22): 2117-2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720

Scheen AJ. EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Empagliflozin reduc-es mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascu-lar risk. Rev Med Liege. 2015; 70(11): 583-589.

Wu JH, Foote C, Blomster J, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: A sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 4(5): 411-419. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00052-8

Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Donfrancesco C, Lo Noce C, Pi-lotto L, Vanuzzo D, on behalf of The Osservatorio Epidemio-logico Cardiovascolare/Health Examination Survey Research Group. Cardiovascular health in Italy. Ten-year surveillance of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: Osservatorio Epi-demiologico Cardiovascolare/Health Examination Survey 1998-2012. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015; 22(Suppl 2): 9-37. doi: 10.1177/2047487315589011

Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Panico S, et al. Favorable cardio-vascular risk profile (Low Risk) and 10-year stroke incidence in women and men: Findings on 12 Italian population samples. Am J Epid. 2006; 163(10): 893-902. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj110

Palmieri L, Donfrancesco C, Giampaoli S, et al. Favor-able cardiovascular risk profile and 10-year coronary heart dis-ease incidence in women and men: Results from the Progetto CUORE. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006; 13(4): 562-570. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000221866.27039.4b

Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Chambless LE, et al. CUORE Proj-ect Research Group. Prediction of coronary events in a low in-cidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation. Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 34(2): 413- 421. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh405

Giorda CB, Nicolucci A, Pellegrini F, et al. Improving qual-ity of care in people with type 2 diabetes through the Associ-azione Medici Diabetologi-annals initiative: A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis. Diabet Med. 2014; 31(5): 615-623. doi: 10.1111/dme.12366

American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(suppl 1): S11-S63. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014

National Center for Health Statistics. International Classi-fication of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Ac-cessed March 2017.

ISO - Ministero della Salute. ATTUAZIONE DELLA DI-RETTIVA 93/42/CEE CONCERNENTE I DISPOSITIVI ME-DICI. Decreto lgs. 24 febbraio 1997, n. 46 emendato col D. lgs. 25.01.2010,n.37 - Recepimento Direttiva 2007/47/CE. Web site. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/c_17_paginearee_1636_listafi-le_itemname_1_file.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2017.

Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al; CKDEPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150 (9): 604-612.

Ceriello A, Gallo M, Armentano V, Perriello G, Gentile S, De Micheli A; Associazione Medici Diabetologi. Personalizing treatment in type 2 diabetes: A self-monitoring of blood glucose inclusive innovative approach. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012; 14(4): 373-378. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0233

American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(1): S13-S22. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S001

Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al; American Dia-betes Association.; European Association for Study of Diabe-tes. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: Aconsensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of thera-py: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabe-tes Care. 2009; 32(1): 193-203. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9025

Akalin S, Berntorp K, Ceriello A, et al; Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control. Intensive glucose therapy and clinical implications of recent data: A consensus statement from the Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control. Int J Clin Pract. 2009; 63(10): 1421-1425. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02165.x

Roden M, Weng J, Eilbracht J, et al; EMPA-REG MONO trial investigators. Empagliflozin monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: A ran-domised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013; 1(3): 208-219. doi: 10.1016/S2213- 8587(13)70084-6

Häring HU, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al; EMPA-REG MET Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin as add-on to met-formin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(6): 1650-1659. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2105

Häring HU, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al; EMPA-REG METSU Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(11): 3396-3404. doi: 10.2337/dc12- 2673

Kovacs CS, Seshiah V, Swallow R, et al; EMPA-REG PIO™ trial investigators. Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, ran-domized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16(2): 147-158. doi: 10.1111/dom.12188

Naing S, Poliyedath A, Khandelwal A, Sigala T. Impact of EMPA-REG OUTCOME® on the management of type 2 diabe-tes mellitus: A review for primary care physicians. Postgrad Med. 2015; 128(8): 822-827. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1245093

Søfteland E, Meier JJ, Vangen B, Toorawa R, Maldonado-Lutomirsky M, Broedl UC. Empagliflozin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lina-gliptin and metformin: A 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(2): 201-209. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1347

Barnett AH, Mithal A, Manassie J, et al EMPA-REG RE-NAL trial investigators. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(5): 369-384.

Rodondi N, Locatelli I, Aujesky D, et al. Health ABC Study. Framingham risk score and alternatives for prediction of coro-nary heart disease in older adults. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3): e34287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034287

D’Agostino RB, Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Fram-ingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008; 117(6): 743-753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579

Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J, et al. Canadian cardio-vascular society/canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treat-ment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25(10): 567-579.

Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N, Cook NR. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: The reynolds risk score. JAMA. 2007; 297(6): 611-619. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.6.611

Ridker PM, Paynter NP, Rifai N, Gaziano JM, Cook NR. C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardio-vascular risk prediction: The Reynolds Risk Score for men. Cir-culation. 2008; 118(22); 2243-2251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULA-TIONAHA.108.814251

Artigao-Rodenas LM, Carbayo-Herencia JA, Divisón-Gar-rote JA, et al; on behalf of the Grupo de EnfermedadesVascu-lares de Albacete (GEVA). Framingham risk score for predic-tion of cardiovascular diseases: A population-based study from southern Europe. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9): e73529. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0073529

Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Carta del rischio cardiovasco-lare. Progetto CUORE 2016. Web site. http://www.cuore.iss.it/ valutazione/carte-pdf.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2017.

Kosiborod M, Cavender MA, Fu AZ, et al; CVD-REAL In-vestigators and Study Group. Lower risk of heart failure and death in patients initiated on sglt-2 inhibitors versus other glucose-low-ering drugs: The CVD-REAL study. Circulation. 2017: 136(3): 249-259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029190

Downloads

Published

2017-07-28

How to Cite

Alessandra Fusco, Sara Colarusso, Marco Piscopo, Maria Rosaria Improta, & Marco Corigliano. (2017). Short-term Cardio-Vascular Risk Score Changes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Empaglifozin: A Real-Life Clinical Experience. Heart Research, 4(3), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.17140/HROJ-4-141

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.