Dynamic Leadership Model of Local Administration Systems

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Milan Krajnc Department of Psychology, London Health School, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-8-166

Keywords:

Municipality, Municipal Administration, Mayor, Director of Municipal Administration, Dynamic model, Strategy goals

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to encourage local community leaders (mayors) to have a different mindset and awareness that the
whole world is created on the basis of local movements, which then become global changes. So, it’s about raising self-confidence
and opening the eyes of the local authorities, what kind of power they really have, they don’t realize it. That in reality, it is the
local communities that direct the world. Municipal administrations today have become very moldy and rigid. They think very
little about development, there is no entrepreneurial mentality at all; above all, they think that they are in charge, not the residents
who are there. Therefore, in the next article, I want to show a different approach to managing the municipality, which will have
to happen if the municipalities want something more than just building roads.

References

Alda A. Things I Overheard while Talking to Myself. NY, USA: Ran-dom House; 2007.

Bacchus GL. An evaluation of the influence of biodynamic practices including foliar-applied silica spray on nutrient quality of organic and conventionally fertilised lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Journal of Organic Systems. 2010; 5: 4-13.

Bavec M, Turinek M, Mlakar SG, et al. Some internal qual-ity properties of white cabbage from different farming systems. Acta Horticulturae. 2012; 933: 577-583. doi: 10.17660/ActaHor-tic.2012.933.75

Berner A, Hildermann I, Fliessbach A, Pfiffner L, Niggli U, Mäder P. Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil and Tillage Research. 2008; 101(1-2): 89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.07.012

Beus CE, Dunlap RE. Conventional versus alternative agricul-ture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociology. 1990; 55(4): 590-616. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00699.x

Beus CE, Dunlap RE. Measuring adherence to alternative vs. conventional agricultural paradigms: A proposed scale. Rural Sociol-ogy. 1991; 56(3): 432-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00442.x

Birkhofer K, Bezemer TM, Bloem J, et al. Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity. Soil Biology and Biochemis-try. 2008; 40(9): 2297-2308. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.007

Brejc M, Vlaj S. Local government in Slovenia: with special re-gard to regionalisation. In: Gál Z (ed). Role of the Regions in the En-larging European Union. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies. Hungari-an Academy of Sciences; 2001: 101-112.

Jayasree P, George A. Do biodynamic practices influence yield, quality, and economics of cultivation of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)? Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 2006; 44: 68-70.

Joergensen RG, Mäder P, Fliebach A. Long-term effects of or-ganic farming on fungal and bacterial residues in relation to micro-bial energy metabolism. Biol Fertil Soils. 2010; 46(3): 303-307. doi: 10.1007/s00374-009-0433-4

Kaval P. The profitability of alternative cropping systems: A re-view of the literature. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 2004; 23(3): 47-65. doi: 10.1300/J064v23n03_06

Kirchmann H. Biological dynamic farming: An occult form of alternative agriculture? J Agric Environ Ethics. 1994; 7(2): 173-187. doi: 10.1007/BF02349036 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Krajnc M

Pavlica MK. Mirno proti krizi: O krizi v podjetju govorimo takrat, ko je podjetje izgubilo nadzor nad ključnimi dejavniki, ki vplivajo na njegovo delovanje in na delovne procese [In: Sloveni-an]. Podjetnik: prvi medij podjetništva. 2004a; 13(11): 36-37.

Krajnc M. Znamenja krize: Ne dopustite jih! [In: Slovenian. Podjetnik: prvi medij podjetništva. 2004b; 13(12): 46-48.

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje proti »organiziraneme kaosu«: Orodja, strategija. Podjetnik: prvi medij podjetništva. 2005a; 14(2): 42- 44.

Krajnc M. Ali zaposleni vedo kaj je cilj podjetja: Orodja, strate-gija. Podjetnik: prvi medij podjetništva. 2005b; 14(4): 54-55.

Krajnc M. Koordinacijski center Evrope. Projektna pisarna. 2005c; 1(11).

Krajnc M. Podjetje kot oder. Podjetnik: prvi medij podjetništva. 2005č; 14(8): 35.

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje (Management). Projektna pisarna. 2005d; 1(2).

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje pri javnih zavodih. Projektna pis-arna. 2005e; 1(9).

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje pri nepremičninah. Projektna pis-arna. 2005f; 1/9.

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje pri ravnanju z odpadki. Projektna pisarna. 2005g; 1(9).

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje pri svetovanju. Projektna pisarna. 2005h; 1(9).

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje v bančništvu. Projektna pisarna. 2005i; 1/9.

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje v društvih. Projektna pisarna. 2005j; 1/9.

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje v ekologiji. Projektna pisarna. 2005k; 1(9).

Krajnc M. Projektno vodenje v gradbeništvu. Projektna pisarna. 2005l; 1(9).

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Milan Krajnc. (2022). Dynamic Leadership Model of Local Administration Systems. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences , 8(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-8-166

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.