Managing Cancer Cachexia: Multi-Disciplinary Healthcare Perspectives

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Joanne Reid School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
  • Aminah Jatoi Department of Medical Oncology,The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Elisa Enriquez-Hesles Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Charlottesville,VA 22908-0395, USA
  • Samuel Porter Department of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH1 3LT, England

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/PMHCOJ-5-132

Keywords:

Qualitative research, Cancer cachexia, Symbolic interactionism, Multi professional care, Patients and carers

Abstract

Background
Cachexia is a syndrome which is a common feature in more than 80% of patients with advanced cancer and globally accounts for over two million deaths per annum. At present there are no standard treatment guidelines for cancer cachexia management. Previous research conducted with the United Kingdom and Australia has highlighted different understanding and treatment practices of health care professionals in cachexia management, however, no study has elucidated the understanding and current practices of health care professionals in the United States.
Aim
The aim of this research was to explore the understanding and current practices of health care professionals in the United States when providing care to an individual with advanced cancer who has cachexia.MethodsThis is a qualitative study underpinned by symbolic interactionism. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted (n=17) with multi-disciplinary oncology staff and thematically analysed. Health care professionals were recruited from one large health care facility in the United States, until data saturation was reached. NVivo was used for data management. Criteria for upholding rigor (credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability) were adhered to within this qualitative study. Full ethical approval was obtained prior to data collection commencing.
Results
Analysis determined four main themes related to (1) recognizing the signs and symptoms of cachexia; (2) the multidimensional impact of cachexia on both patients and families; (3) complexities when treating cachexia; and (4) future direction of care delivery for patients with advanced cancer who have cachexia.
Conclusion
Participants within this study recognized the multi-factorial pathophysiology of cachexia and its holistic impact which spanned biological, psychological and social domains. Additionally, they recognized the impact of cachexia on not only patients but also their family carers. In particular the feelings of helplessness family carers experience in trying to stop the progressive and involun-tary weight loss associated with cachexia. Further research is required to examine how to best support the needs of patients with advanced cancer who have cachexia and their family carers and equip staff to optimize delivery of this.

References

DeWys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, et al. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Am J Med. 1980; 69(4): 491-497. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3

Temel JS, Abernethy AP, Currow CD, et al. Anamorelin in pa-tients with non-small cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA1 and ROMANA 2): Results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 519-531. doi: 10.1016/S1470- 2045(15)00558-6

Bruggeman AR, Kamal AH, LeBlan TW, et al. Cancer cachexia: Beyond weight loss. J Oncol Pract. 2016; 12(11): 1163-1171. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016832

LeBalnc TW, Nipp RD, Rushing CN, et al. Correlation between the international consensus definition of the Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome (CACS) and patient-centred outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 49: 680-689. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.008

Bruera E. ABC of palliative care: Anorexia, cachexia and nutri-tion. BMJ. 1997; 315: 1219-1222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7117.1219

Fearon, KCH, Voss AC, Hustead DS. Definition of cancer ca-chexia: Effect of weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation on functional status and prognosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83(6): 1345-1350. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1345

Radbruch L, Elsner F, Trottenberg P, Strasser F, Fearon K. Clini-cal practice guidelines on cancer cachexia in advanced cancer pa-tients with a focus on refractory cachexia. Web site: https://www. partnershipagainstcancer.ca/db-sage/sage20131737/. 2010. Ac-cessed March 16, 2019.

Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classifica-tion of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(5): 489-495. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7

Reid J, McKenna HP, Fitzsimons D, McCance,T. Fighting over food: Patient and family understanding of cancer cachexia.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009; 36(4): 439-445. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.439-445

Reid J, McKenna HP, Fitzsimons D, McCance, TV. The experi-ence of cancer cachexia: A qualitative study of advanced cancer patients and their family members. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 46(5): 606-616. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.012

Hinsley R, Hughes R. The reflections you get: An exploration of body image and cachexia. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007; 13(2): 84-89. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2007.13.2.23068

Holden CM. Anorexia in terminally ill cancer patients: The emotional impact on the patient and the family. Hosp J. 1991; 7: 73-84. doi: 10.1300/J011v07n03_06

Reid J, McKenna HP, Fitzsimons D, McCance TV. An explora-tion of the experience of cancer cachexia: What patients and their families want from health care professionals. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010; 19(5): 682-689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01124.x

Strasser F, Binswanger J, Cerny T, Kesselring A. Fighting a los-ing battle: Eating related distress of men with advanced cancer and their female partners. A mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2007; 21: 129-137. doi: 10.1177/0269216307076346

Millar C, Reid J, and Porter S. Refractory cachexia and truth-telling about terminal prognosis: A qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013; 22(3): 326-333. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12032

Scott D, Reid J, Hudson P, Martin P, Porter S. Health care pro-fessionals’ experience, understanding and perception of need of advanced cancer patients with cachexia and their families: The benefits of a dedicated clinic. BMC Palliat Care. 2016; 15: 100. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0171-y

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thou-sand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 1994.

Bulmer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jer-sey, USA: Prentice Hall. 1969.

Handberg C, Thorne S, Midtgaard J, et al. Revisiting symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework beyond the grounded theory tradition. Qual Health Res. 2015; 25(8): 1023-1032. doi: 10.1177/1049732314554231

Benzie KM, Allen MN. Symbolic Interactionism as a theoreti-21 Reid J, et al cal perspective for multiple method research. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 33(4): 541-547. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01680.x

Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 2016; 5(1): 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Cresswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Meth-ods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 2011.

Mishler EG. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cam-bridge, USA: Harvard University Press; 1986.

Doody O, Noonan M. Preparing and conducting inter-view to collect data. Nurse Res. 2013; 20(5): 28-32. doi: 10.7748/ nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327

Reissman CK. Narrative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 1993.

Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in quali-tative research. Qualitative Report. 2015; 20(9): 1408-1416.

Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. An Ex-panded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 1994.

Sandelwoski M. The problem of rigour in qualitative research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1986; 8(3): 27-37.

Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 2003.

Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Cali-fornia, USA: SAGE Publicaions; 1985.

Koch T. Establishing rigor in qualitative research: The deci-sion trail. J Adv Nurs. 1994; 19: 976-986. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2648.2006.03681.x

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Ox-ford, USA: Oxford University Press; 1987.

Lewis C, Reid J, Porter S. Healthcare professionals’ response to cachexia in advanced cancer: A qualitative study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013; 40(6): E393-402. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E393-E402

Cooper C, Burden ST, Cheng H, Molassiotis A. Understand-ing and managing cancer-related weight loss and anorexia: Insights from a systematic review of qualitative research. J Cachexia Sarcope-nia Muscle. 2015; 6(1): 99-111. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12010

Orrevall Y, Tishelman C, Permert J. Home parenteral nutrition: A qualitative interview study of the experiences of advanced can-cer patients and their families. Clin Nutr. 2005; 24(6): 961-970. doi: Orginal Research | Volume 5 | Number 1| 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.06.008

McClement SE, Degner LF, Harlos MS. Family beliefs regarding the nutritional care of a terminally ill relative: A qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003; 6(5): 737-748. doi: 10.1089/109662103322515248

Annas GJ. Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster and Public Health. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press; 2010. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Orginal Research | Volume 5 | Number 1| Reid J, et al

Muscaritoli M, Rossi FanelliF, Molfino A. Perspectives of health care professionals on cancer cachexia: Results from three global surveys. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(12): 2230-2236. doi: 10.1093/ annonc/mdw420

Gawande A. Being Mortal: Illness, Medicineand What Matters in the End. London, UK: Wellcome Collection; 2015.

Published

2019-08-07

How to Cite

Joanne Reid, Aminah Jatoi, Elisa Enriquez-Hesles, & Samuel Porter. (2019). Managing Cancer Cachexia: Multi-Disciplinary Healthcare Perspectives. Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care, 5(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.17140/PMHCOJ-5-132

Most read articles by the same author(s)