A Community Engagement Model to Drive Advance Directive Discussion and Completion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PMHCOJ-7-143Keywords:
Palliative care, Advance directives, Community outreachAbstract
BackgroundAdvance directives (ADs) describe individuals’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments and/or surrogate decision-makers, to help avoid unwanted, burdensome treatments at the end-of-life. However, only 36.7% of adults have completed an AD. There is growing interest in adopting a public health approach to end-of-life care, including ADs. We describe the experience of Honor-ing Choices Tennessee (HCT) which developed a pilot program, Advance Directives at Work in Tennessee (AD@WorkTN), to enhance AD completion by the general public workforce.
Methods
The AD@WorkTN initiative targeted adults in the Tennessee workforce by engaging human resource (HR) leaders in educational presentations. Each workshop provided resources to employers to integrate ADs into the employee orientation and benefits en-rollment process. Educational materials, web tools, podcasts, AD forms, and a demonstration of how to complete an AD were included. Participants were directed to the HCT website which contains the state advance directive documents and with detailed instructions, as well as the co-branded MyDirectives app (MYD), to securely upload completed ADs. In April 2021 a HCT spon-sored PBS documentary on advance care planning was produced with statewide distribution.
Results
Over a 2-year period, 58 workshops were conducted for 260 human resources leaders representing 958 businesses. As a result, 23 businesses have included ADs as part of the employee benefit process. Additionally, a 2-year multifaceted public outreach campaign between 2019-21 has reached 2,950 employees and 958 businesses. Approximately 81,500 Tennessee viewers have seen the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) documentary on advance care planning. There have been 2,954 visits to the HCT website and 411 visits to the co-branded MyDirectives site.
Conclusion
AD@WorkTN is a promising model to promote integration of ADs into the employee orientation and benefits enrollment processes. Enhanced discussion and completion of ADs among employed individuals and enhanced public discourse such as podcasts and television productions may encourage intergenerational conversations about end-of-life care and documentation in healthcare records.
References
Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, Kent S, Kim J, Herbst N, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Affairs. 2017; 36(7): 1244-1251. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0175
Greco PJ, Schulman KA, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Hansen-Flaschen J. The Patient self-determination act and the future of advance di-rectives. Annal Int Med. 1991; 115(8): 639-643. doi: 10.7326/0003- 4819-115-8-639 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 19 Powers JS et al Cumulative Nnumber 154 businesses 364 employees 674 businesses 733 employees 958 businesses 2,950 employees 18,500 views Cumulative Number 1,144 2,954
Abel J, Kellehear A. Palliative care reimagined: A needed shift. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2016; 6: 21-26. doi: 10.1136/bm-jspcare-2015-001009
Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell E, Greenlee H, Collier AC. The quality of patient-doctor communication about end-of-life care: A study of patients with advanced aids and their primary care clini-cians. AIDS. 13(9): 1123-1131.
Honoring Choices® Tennessee. Web site. http://advancedirec-tivestn.org. Accessed June 30, 2021.
MyDirectives. Web site. https://mydirectives.com/. Accessed June 30, 2021.
Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, Foster T, Goldmann D, Hall LW, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Re-porting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008; 17 Suppl 1: i13-32. doi: 10.1136/ qshc.2008.029058
Hempel S, Shekelle PG, Liu JL, Danz MS, Foy R, Lim Y-W, et al. Development of the quality improvement minimum quality crite-ria set (QI-MQCS): A tool for critical appraisal of quality improve-ment intervention publications. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 796-804. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151
Halpern SD. Shaping end-of-life care: Behavioral economics and advance directives. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 33 (4): 393- 400. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322403
Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D. Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(4S): S57-S62. doi: 10.1037/0278- 6133.24.4.S57
Halpern J, Arnold RM. Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(10): 1708-1712. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0719-5
Silveira MJ, Kim SYH, Langa KM. Advance directives and out-comes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1211-1218. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901 Original Research | Volume 7 | Number 1|
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care (PMHC) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
