Risk Assessment-Focused Interdisciplinary Outpatient Palliative Care Consultation for Elderly Veterans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PMHCOJ-5-130Keywords:
Risk stratification, Geriatric care, Outpatient palliative care consultationAbstract
Context
The Centers for medicare and medicaid services (CMS) and the Veterans Administration quality improvement objectives encourage completion of advance directives and palliative care consultation to enhance patient-centered care and to promote patient autonomy. The prevalence of advance care planning documents in the electronic health record (EHR) and outpatient palliative care consultation is low and strategies to improve outpatient advance care planning are needed. The aim of this feasibility project was to risk stratify the older Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (TVHS) population, utilizing operations data, to target primary palliative care consultation and completion of advance care planning documents.
Methods
We compared immediate outpatient palliative care consultation outcomes in two populations: Group 1: high-risk patients identi-fied using a clinical risk calculator, the clinical assessment of need (CAN) compared to Group 2: consecutive patients presenting to a geriatric clinic.
Results
The patient population identified systematically by high-risk CAN score for advance care planning (Group 1), N=52, increased palliative care consultation prevalence to 35%. The prevalence of advance care planning documents in the EHR remained 30% for this population. High-risk patients were more often referred for community-based services (29% versus 12%) and received more hospice referrals (8% versus 4%) compared to a sample of consecutive patients presenting to a geriatric clinic (Group 2), N=26.
Conclusion
A systematic approach to identifying high-risk patients appears to target a population with more needs compared to a sample of consecutive elderly outpatients presenting in the outpatient department. A clinically derived risk calculator can help identify high-risk patients appropriate for focused care services, such as geriatric specialty care, home and community based services, and advance care planning.
References
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services merit based incentive payment system (MIPS). 2018 MIPS Measure #047: Care Plan. Web site. http://healthmonix.com/mips_qual-ity_measure/2018-mips-quality-measure-047/. Accessed April 16, 2019.
Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, et al. Approximately onein three US adults completes any type of advance directive forend-of-life care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36: 1244-1251. doi: 10.1377/ hlthaff.2017.0175
Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administra-tion.Patient aligned care team (Geri-PACT) Handbook. Web site. https://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ ID=3115. Accessed March 7, 2019.
Care Assessment Need (CAN) Score and the Patient Care As-sessment System (PCAS): Tools for Care Management. Stephan Fihn MD MPH Tami Box PhD Office of Informatics and Analyt-ics Veterans Health Administration. Web site. https://www.hsrd. research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/713- notes.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2019.
Wong ES, Rosland AM, Fihn SD, Nelson KM. Patient-centered medical home implementation in the veterans health administra-tion and primary care use: Differences by patient comorbidity burden. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(12): 1467-1474. doi: 10.1007/ s11606-016-3833-9
WangL, PorterB, MaynardC, et al. Predicting risk of hospitaliza-tion or death among patients receiving primary care in the Veterans Health Administration. Med Care. 2013; 51: 368-373. doi: 10.1097/ MLR.0b013e31827da95a
Powers JS, Gandelman JA. Use of a clinically derived risk cal-culator to assess advance care planning for elderly veterans in the outpatient setting. Palliat Med Hosp Care Open J. 2018; 4(1): 14-18. doi: 10.17140/PMHCOJ-4-129
Ogrinc G. Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (standards for quality improvement reporting excellence) guidelines for qual-ity improvement reporting: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ Qual Saf. 2008; 17(Suppl 1): i13-i32. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029058
Hempel S, Shekelle PG, Liu JL, et al. Development of the quality improvement minimum quality criteria set (QI-MQCS): A tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 796-804. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care (PMHC) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
