PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer: From Phase I to Plenary Session

Authors

  • Rajvi Patel Northwell Health Cancer Institute and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, NY, USA
  • Daniel Fein, MD Tufts University, School of Medicine,Tufts Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
  • Carolina B. Ramirez, MD Northwell Health Cancer Institute and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, NY, USA
  • Kevin Do Tufts University, School of Medicine,Tufts Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
  • Muhammad W. Saif Northwell Health Cancer Institute and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, NY, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e011

Keywords:

Pancreatic cancer; Chemoresistance; DNA damage repair; Synthetic lethality; BRCA1/2; Germline mutations; Genomics;

Abstract

Survival rates for pancreatic cancer remain dismal. Current standard of care treatment regimens provide transient clinical benefit but eventually chemoresistance develops. Tumors deficient in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage repair mechanisms such as BRCA mutants show better responses to platinum based agents, however, such tumors can utilize the poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]–ribose) polymerase (PARP) pathway as a salvage mechanism. Therefore, inhibition of PARP pathway could lead to tumor destruction and synthetic lethality in presence of BRCA mutation. Various PARP inhibitors have been approved for treatment of patients with germline or somatic BRCA mutant breast and ovarian cancer. This provides basis of using PARP inhibitors in patients with pancreatic cancer that harbor BRCA mutation. A recent phase III Pancreas Cancer Olaparib Ongoing (POLO) study showed impressive results with near doubling of progression free survival compared to placebo (7.4 vs 3.8 months). These results highlight the importance of germline testing for all patients with pancreatic cancer and inclusion of additional deficiencies in homologous recombination repair (ATM and PALB2) including BRCA variants of uncertain significance should be further explored.

References

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Statistics. American Cancer Society. Web site. https://www.cancerstatisticscenter.can-cer.org/. Accessed July 9, 2019.

Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(19): 1817-1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923

Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, et al. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(34): 4548-4554. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5742

Almoguera C, Shibata D, Forrester K, Martin J, Arnheim N, Perucho M. Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes. Cell. 1988; 53(4): 549-554. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90571-5

Pellegata NS, Sessa F, Renault B, et al. K-ras and p53 gene muta-tions in pancreatic cancer: Ductal and nonductal tumors progress through different genetic lesions. Cancer Res. 1994; 54(6): 1556- 1560.

Hezel AF, Kimmelman AC, Stanger BZ, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev. 2006; 20(10): 1218-1249. doi: 10.1101/gad.1415606

Maitra A, Hruban RH. Pancreatic cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008; 3: 157-188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154305

Helleday T. The underlying mechanism for the PARP and BRCA synthetic lethality: Clearing up the misunderstandings. Mol Oncol. 2011; 5(4): 387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.001

Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ri-bose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(2): 123-134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900212

Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM, et al. Whole genome Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ e8 Saif MW et al sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6(2): 166-75. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290. CD-15-0402

Shindo K, Yu J, Suenaga M, et al. Deleterious germline mu-tations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic adeno-carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(30): 3382-3390. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2017.72.3502

Ferrone, C.R., Levine DA, Tang LH, et al. BRCA germline mu-tations in jewish patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009. 27(3): 433-438. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5546

Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, et al. Ola-parib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a ger-mline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(3): 244-250. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2728

Shroff RT, Hendifar A, McWilliams RR, et al. Rucaparib mo-notherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer and a known delete-rious BRCA mutation. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018; 2018. doi: 10.1200/ PO.17.00316

Similar Efficacy Across PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer, But Safety Analysis Favors Olaparib. Paper presented at: SGO An-nual Meeting; 2018; New Orleans, LA, USA.

Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, et al. Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(4): 317-327. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903387

Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(26): 2495-2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858

Heeke AL, Pishvaian MJ, Lynce F, et al. Prevalence of homolo-gous recombination-related gene mutations across multiple cancer types. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018; 2018. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00286

Mateo J, Porta N, McGovern UB, et al. TOPARP-B: A phase II randomized trial of the poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) in-hibitor olaparib for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) with DNA damage repair (DDR) alterations. J Clin On-col. 2019; 37(15_suppl): 5005-5005. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_ suppl.5005 Editorial | Volume 3 | Number 1|

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Rajvi Patel, Daniel Fein, MD, Carolina B. Ramirez, MD, Kevin Do, & Muhammad W. Saif. (2019). PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer: From Phase I to Plenary Session. Pancreas, 3(1), e5-e8. https://doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e011