Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e010Keywords:
Pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20); Desmoplasia; Pancreatic cancer; Chemoresistance; HALO.Abstract
Survival rates for pancreatic cancer (PC) remain dismal. Current standard of care treatment regimens provide transient clinical benefit but eventually chemoresistance develops leading to poor outcomes. PC is a relatively chemoresistant tumor and one of the explanations for this is attributed to desmoplasia that impedes drug delivery. Based on this, stromal modifying agent such as Pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) was developed and investigated in phase I-III studies. Although phase I-II studies showed promising results in patients with high hyaluronic acid (HA) expressing tumors, the phase III HALO 301 study failed to miss it’s primary endpoint and further development of PEHPH20 is halted. This failure implies that targeting desmoplasia alone is not sufficient and other intrinsic factors such as lack of significant neoantigens, low tumor mutational burden, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition may be at play. It is also important to consider that although the tumor stroma may be a physical bar-rier hampering drug delivery, it may also have protective effects in restraining tumor growth and progression. Further studies in molecular biology to better characterize the complex interaction between the microenvironment and cancer cells are warranted.
References
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Statistics. Web site. https://www.cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/. Accessed No-vember 5, 2019.
Noonan AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M. SEER Cancer Sta-tistics Review, 1975-2015. Web site. https://seer.cancer.gov/ csr/1975_2015/. Accessed November 5, 2019.
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(19): 1817-1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923
Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J e3 Med. 2013; 369(18): 1691-1703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369
Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcita-bine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase III trial of the National Cancer Insti-tute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(15): 1960-1966. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9525
Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, et al. Maintenance olaparib for ger-mline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(4): 317-327. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903387
Merika EE, Syrigos KN, and M.W. Saif, Desmoplasia in pancrea-tic cancer. Can we fight it? Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012; 2012: 781765. doi: 10.1155/2012/781765
Cheng XB, Sato N, Kohi S, Yamaguchi K. Prognostic impact of hyaluronan and its regulators in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e80765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080765
Hingorani SR, Harris WP, Beck JT, et al. Phase Ib study of PE-Gylated recombinant human hyaluronidase and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(12): 2848-2854. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2010
Hingorani SR, Zheng L, Bullock AJ, et al. HALO 202: Rando-mized Phase II study of PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcita-bine versus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in patients with untreated, metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(4): 359-366. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9564
Doherty GJ, Tempero M, Corrie PG. HALO-109-301: A Phase III trial of PEGPH20 (with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) in hyaluronic acid-high stage IV pancreatic cancer. Future Oncol. 2018; 14(1): 13-22. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0338
Diego S. Halozyme Announces HALO-301 Phase 3 Study Fails to Meet Primary Endpoint. Halozyme Therapeutics. Web site. https://www.halozyme.com/investors/news-releases/news-re-lease-details/2019/Halozyme-Announces-HALO-301-Phase-3- Study-Fails-To-Meet-Primary-Endpoint/default.aspx. Accessed November 4, 2019.
Ramanathan RK, McDonough SL, Philip PA, et al. Phase IB/II randomized study of FOLFIRINOX plus pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase versus FOLFIRINOX alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: SWOG S1313. J Clin Oncol. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ e4 Saif MW et al 2019; 37(13): 1062-1069. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01295
Uzunparmak B, Sahin IH. Pancreatic cancer microenviron-ment: A current dilemma. Clin Transl Med. 2019; 8(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s40169-019-0221-1
Beatty GL, Eghbali S, Kim R. Deploying immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer: Defining mechanisms of response and re-sistance. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017; 37: 267-278. doi: 10.14694/EDBK_175232
Le DT, Ko AK, Wainberg ZA, et al. Results from a phase 2b, randomized, multicenter study of GVAX pancreas and CRS-207 compared to chemotherapy in adults with previously-treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ECLIPSE Study). Jour-nal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 35(4_suppl): 345-345. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.345
Burris HA, 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15(6): 2403-2413. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403
Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol, 2013; 31(13): 1640-1648. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3680
O’Reilly EM, Oh DY, Dhani N, et al. Durvalumab with or wi-thout tremelimumab for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588
Zheng X, Carstens JL, Kim J, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresis-tance in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015; 527(7579): 525-530. doi: 10.1038/nature16064
Rhim AD, Oberstein PE, Thomas DH, et al. Stromal elements act to restrain, rather than support, pancreatic ductal adenocarcino-ma. Cancer Cell. 2014; 25(6): 735-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.021
Sinn M, Denkert C, Striefler JK, et al. α-Smooth muscle actin expression and desmoplastic stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer: results from the CONKO-001 study. Br J Cancer. 2014; 111(10): 1917-1923. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.495 Editorial | Volume 3 | Number 1|
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Pancreas (POJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.