Towards a United Front against Weight Bias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-3-e004Keywords:
Weight Bias, Obesity, health issues, ParadoxicallyAbstract
Obesity is considered as one of the most alarming contemporary health issues.1 Paradoxically, as the prevalence of obesity increases, discrimination against individuals that are considered as overweight is also on the rise.2 Weight bias associates overweight with negative personal attributes, such as laziness, lack of intelligence and self-discipline, unsuccessfulness and unattractiveness.3 These biases lead to discrimination, which affects a wide range of the targeted individual’s life dimensions, including education, work and healthcare, as well as interpersonal relationships.
References
WHO. Controlling the global obesity epidemic. 2017. Web site. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/. Accessed September 24, 2017.
Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995–1996 through 2004–2006. Obesity. 2008; 16(5): 1129-1134. doi: 10.1038/ oby.2008.35
Puhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(6): 1019-1028. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491
Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: A review and up-date. Obesity. 2009; 17(5): 941-964. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636
Carels RA, Rossi J, Solar C, Selensky JC. Changes in perceived mate value and weight bias associated with former obesity status. Stigma and Health. 2017. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ e2 Brisson B, et al
Almeida L, Savoy S, Boxer P. The role of weight stigmatization in cumulative risk for binge eating. J Clin Psychol. 2011; 67(3): 278- 292. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20749
Pearl RL, Puhl RM, Dovidio JF. Differential effects of weight bias experiences and internalization on exercise among women with overweight and obesity. J Health Psychol. 2015; 20(12): 1626- 1632. doi: 10.1177/1359105313520338
O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Puhl RM, et al. The relationship between weight stigma and eating behavior is explained by weight bias in-ternalization and psychological distress. Appetite. 2016; 102: 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.032
Alberga AS, Russell-Mayhew S, von Ranson KM, McLaren, L. Weight bias: A call to action. J Eat Disord. 2016; 4: 1-6. doi:
1186/s40337-016-0112-4 10. Rodgers RF. The role of the ‘Healthy Weight’ discourse in body image and eating concerns: An extension of sociocultural theory. Eating Behaviors. 2016; 22: 194-198. doi: 10.1016/j.eat-beh.2016.06.004
Puhl R, Suh Y. Stigma and eating and weight disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015; 17(3): 10. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0552-6
Marquis E, Leblanc C, Blais C, Fiset D, Gagnon-Girouard M, Brisson B. The effect of social acceptability on the implicit and explicit expression of weight bias: A comparison with racism. In preparation. 2017.
Crandall CS. Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(5), 882-894. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.66.5.882
Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology. 2005; 24(5): 517-525. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.517
Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, et al. Weight bias reduction in health professionals: A systematic review. Clin Obes. 2016; 6(3): 175-188. doi: 10.1111/cob.12147
Puhl R, Luedicke J, Peterson JL. Public reactions to obesity-related health campaigns: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(1): 36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.010
Leblanc CA, Gagnon-Girouard MP, Blais C, Bisson B. Weight bias among young adults: Could one’s own body image issues mat-ter the most? Submitted. 2017.
Amodio DM. The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 15(10): 670-682. doi: 10.1038/nrn3800 Editorial | Volume 3 | Number 1|
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Social Behavior Research and Practice (SBRP) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.