Long-Term Follow-Up After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/UAOJ-7-147Keywords:
Erectile dysfunction, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, Lower urinary tract symptoms, Long-term follow-up, Prostate cancerAbstract
Objective
To explore the impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) on lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent LRP at the Civil Hospital Ahmedabad’s Urology Department from June 2008 to June 2023.
Results
Major complications following LRP are generally rare, including bladder neck stenosis, erectile dysfunction, and urinary incontinence. The incidence of erectile dysfunction varies widely, ranging from 11-87%, and urinary incontinence ranges from 0-87%, depending on the definitions used. Functional decline typically peaks shortly after surgery, with the most rapid recovery occurring within the first year post-LRP. Some patients continue to improve gradually over time. However, for some men, these adverse effects can be long-lasting. Other, less common side effects should also be considered. Despite significant technological advancements in the past 20 years, no single surgical technique has emerged as superior in terms of long-term outcomes, as surgical volume, surgeon experience, and patient characteristics remain key determinants.
Conclusion
When discussing treatment options for prostate cancer, it is crucial to consider potential complications like erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence following LRP, as well as the expected recovery period. Counseling is provided to patients, taking into account their age and overall health profile. Surgical advice is given to eligible patients after evaluating the risk-benefit ratio. Patients who are older or do not meet the criteria are given appropriate guidance. All patients are informed about the possible complications after surgery and are presented with the option of palliative care or surgical treatment.
References
Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(11): 981-990. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1113135
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000; 55(1): 58-61. doi: 10.1016/S0090- 4295(99)00397-0
Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(3): 418-430. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046
Schauer I, Keller E, Müller A, Madersbacher S. Have rates of erectile dysfunction improved within the past 17 years after radical prostatectomy? A systematic analysis of the control arms of prospective randomized trials on penile rehabilitation. Andrology. 2015; 3(4): 661-665. doi: 10.1111/andr.12060
Carlsson S, Jäderling F, Wallerstedt A, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy for very-low-risk prostate cancer: Results from the prospective LAPPRO trial. BJU Int. 2016; 118(2): 205-212. doi: 10.1111/bju.13444
Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, et al. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(4): 692-704. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.020
Rohrmann S, Katzke V, Kaaks R. Prevalence and progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in an aging population. Urology. 2016; 95: 158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.021
Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The bristol female lower urinary tract symptoms questionnaire: Development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 1996; 77(6): 805-812. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.00186.x Retrospective Study | Volume 7 | Number 1|
Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997; 49(6): 822-830. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0
Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, Fowler FJ, Jr. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(5): 513-518. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2011.36.8621
Yoo HJ, Lee B, Jung EA, Kim SG, Kim YS, Yoo JJ. Prevalence and risk factors of erectile dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Int. 2023; 17(2): 452-462. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10270-y
Deliveliotis C, Liakouras C, Delis A, Skolarikos A, Varkarakis J, Protogerou V. Prostate operations: Long-term effects on sexual and urinary function and quality of life. Comparison with an age-matched control population. Urological Research. 2004; 32(4): 283- 289. doi: 10.1007/s00240-004-0411-0
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen R. C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(3): 405-417. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/online-manuscript-submission-system/ Retrospective Study | Volume 7 | Number 1| Shah SJ, et al
Schwartz EJ, Lepor H. Radical retropubic prostatectomy reduces symptom scores and improves quality of life in men with moderate and severe lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol. 1999; 161(4): 1185-1188. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61625-2
Matsubara A, Yoneda T, Yasumoto H, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms after radical perineal prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007; 37(7): 534-539. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hym058
Wang L, Chung SF-CM, Yip SKH, Lau WKO, Cheng CWS, Sim HG. The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2011; 29(2): 177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.030
Creta M, Manfredi C, Arcaniolo D, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients with history of surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41391- 023-00678-y
Donovan J. L, Hamdy F. C, Lane J. A, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1425- 1437. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1606221
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Urology and Andrology (UA) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
