Factors Affecting Rumen Microbial Protein Synthesis: A Review

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Abdukarim Y. Harun College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
  • Kedir Sali College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-4-133

Keywords:

Rumen; pouvoir hydrogène (pH); Microbial protein; Rumen ecosystem; Ruminant; Rumen microflora; Nutrient; Haematological parameters reference ranges; Healthy status.

Abstract

There is a diversified microbial ecosystem in the rumen for efficient utilization of diet by providing essential nutrient to their host.
But there are different factors affecting rumen microbial protein synthesis which are physical factors, chemical factors, dietary
factors, biological factors and endogenous factors. Among the details of factors, dietary factors and ruminal pH are the dominant
factors influencing rumen microbial protein production. The effects of some dietary factors, on the amount and efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, are discussed in this review. Specifically, these factors include forage quality diets, level of feed and types
of feed. It seemed that diets containing a mixture of forages and concentrates increase the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis because of an improved rumen environment for the growth of more diverse bacterial species. This review describes physical
and chemical factors which include: pH and buffer system, oxygen concentration, rumen outflow rate and synchronized release
of nitrogen and energy from the diet, a nitrogen compound, energy spilling, vitamins and minerals and antimicrobials chemicals,
respectively. Age, species, physiological status, sex, and stress are among endogenous factors that mostly affect microbial protein
synthesis of a ruminant. Bacteriophages, protozoa predation and bacterial lysis are biological factors affecting the efficiency of
microbial protein synthesis. All these factors have a direct effect on the synthesis of microbial protein in the rumen. Therefore,
the cumulative effects of the above factors are resulted in the depopulation of rumen microflora and finally reduction of animal
product. So, improvement in quantitative aspect of microbial protein synthesis solves many problems from simple to complex so
that, the quantitative aspect of rumen microbial biomass are invaluable for health and productivity of ruminants than qualitative
aspect hence, maintain health rumen ecosystem means having healthy ruminant.

References

Kamra DN. Rumen microbial ecosystem. Current Science. 2005; 89: 124-135.

Dewhurst RJ, Davies DR, Merry RJ. Microbial protein supply from the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2000; 85: 1-21. doi: 10.1016/ S0377-8401(00)00139-5

Karsli MA, Russel JR. Effects of source and concentrations of nitrogen and carbohydrate on ruminal microbial protein. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2002; 26(2002): 201-207.

Hederson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A,Young W. Rumen mi-crobial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core micro biome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 14567(2015).

Pathak AK. Various factors affecting microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Veterinary World. 2008; 1(6): 186-189.

Clark JH, Klusmeyer TH, Cameron MR. Microbial protein syn-thesis and flow of N fraction to the duodenum from the rumen. Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Animal Feed Science and Technology. 1992; 85: 1-2.

Sniffen CJ, Robinson PH. Symposium: Protein and fiber diges-tion, passage, and utilization in lactating cows Microbial growth and flow as influenced by dietary manipulations. J Dairy Sci. 1987; 70: 425-441.

Iskenderov TB, Mamedova KQ. Synthesis of Microbial protein in rumen and the influence of different factors on this process. J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2013; 39: 131-135.

Srinivas B, Krishnamoorthy U. Panoply of microbial protein production in ruminants–A Review. Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2016; 83(4): 331-346.

Cerrato-Sánches M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A. Effects of time at suboptimal pH on rumen fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 1486-1492. doi: 10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(07)71634-X

Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Devant M. Effects of pH and pH fluc-tuations on microbial fermentation and nutrient flow from a dual-flow continuous culture system. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85: 574-579. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74111-8

Strobel HJ, Russell JB. Effect of pH and energy spilling on bac-terial protein synthesis by carbohydrate-limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 1986; 69: 2941-2947

Verbic J, Ørskov ER, Žgajnar J, et al. The effect of method of forage preservation on the protein degradability and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1999; 82: 195- 212. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00102-9

Erdman RA. Dietary buffering requirements of the lactating dairy cow: A review. J Dairy Sci. 1988; 71: 3246-3266. doi: 10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(88)79930-0

Stokes SR, Hoover WH, Miller TK, Blauweikel R. Ruminal di-gestion and microbial utilization of diets varying in type of carbo-hydrates and protein. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 871-881. doi: 10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(91)78236-2

Owens FN, Zinn R. Protein metabolism of ruminant animals. In: Church DC, ed. The Ruminant Animal, Digestive Physiology And Nutrition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall; 1988: 227-249.

Zhao JY, Shimojo M, Goto I. The effects of feeding level and roughage/concentrate ratio on the measurements of protein de-gradability of two tropical forages in the rumen of goats, using the nylon bag technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1993; 41: 261-269. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(93)90001-Z

Maekawa M, Beauchemin KA, Christensen DA. Chewing ac-tivity, saliva production, and ruminal pH of primiparous and mul-tiparous lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85: 1176-1182. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74180-5 Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Sali K, et al

Storm AC, Kristensen NB, Røjen BA, Larsen M. Technical note: A method for quantification of saliva secretion and salivary flux of metabolites in dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 2014; 91: 5769-5774. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6865

James BR, Dombrowski DB. Applied and environmental mi-crobiology. 1980; 39(3): 604-610.

West JW, Coppock CE, Milam KZ, Nave DH, Labore JM, Rowe LD . Potassium carbonate as a potassium source and dietary buffer for lactating Holstein cows during hot weather. J Dairy Sci. 1987; 70(2): 309-320. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80012-7

Pourazad P, Khiaosa-Ard R, Qumar M, et al. Transient feeding of a concentrate-rich diet increases the severity of subacute rumi-nal acidosis in dairy cattle. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(2): 726-738. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9605

Kim DH, McLeod KR, Klotz JL, Koontz AF, Foote AP, Har-mon DL. Evaluation of a rapid determination of fasting heat production and respiratory quotient in Holstein steers using the washed rumen technique. J Anim Sci. 2014; 91: 4267-4276. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5595

Yazdi MH, Mirzaei-Alamouti HR, Amanlou H. Effects of heat stress on metabolism, digestibility, and rumen epithelial character-istics in growing holstein calves. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(1): 77-89. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9364

Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walkera ND, Bach A. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Anim Fd Sci Technol. 2008; 145(1-4): 5-26. doi: 10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2007.04.019

Ellis JE, Williams AG, Lloyd D. Oxygen by ruminal microor-ganisms: Protozoal and bacterial contributions. Appl Environ Micro-biol. 1989; 55: 2583-2587.

Jasi MUMd, Haque KZ, Jasimuddin KMd, Hasan MdK. Dy-namics of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Annals of Vet-erinary and Animal Science. 2015; 2(5): 117-131

Agricultural and Food Research Council. Agricultural and Food Research Council, Technical Committee on Responses to Nutri-ents: Report No. 9: Nutritive Requirements of Ruminant Animals: Protein. 1992; 62: 787-835.

National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academic Press; 2001.

Evans E. An evaluation of the relationships between dietary parameters and rumen solid turnover rate. Canadian Journal of Ani-mal Science. 1981; 61: 91-96. doi: 10.4141/cjas81-014

Meng Q1, Kerley MS, Ludden PA, Belyea RL. Fermentation substrate and dilution rate interact to affect microbial growth and efficiency. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77: 206-214. doi: 10.2527/1999.771206x

Evans E. Practicalities of balancing diets for amino acids. Paper presented at: TRI-state Dairy Nutrition Conference, Ohio State University; April 8-9, 2003; Columbus, Ohio, USA. 133-140.

Gomes MJ, Hovell FD, Chen XB, Nengomasha EM, Fikremar-iam D. The effect of starch supplementation of straw on microbial protein supply in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994; 49: 277-286. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(94)90052-3

Zadeh JB, Moradikor Z, Moradikor N. Synchronization of en-ergy and protein on supply synthesis microbial protein. Int J Adv Biol Biom Res. 2013; 1: 594-600.

Cabrita ARJ, Dewhurs RJ, Abreu JMF, Fonseca AJM. Evalua-tion of the effects of synchronizing the availability of N and en-ergy on rumen function and production responses of dairy cows. Anim. Res. 2005; 55: 1-24. doi: 10.1051/animres:2005045

Karsli M, Russel JR. Effects of some dietary factors on rumen microbial protein synthesis. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2001; 25: 681-686.

Russell JB. The energy spilling reaction of bacteria and other organisms. J Mol Micro biol Biotechnol. 2007; 13: 1-11. doi: 10.1159/000103591

Van Kessel JS, Russell JB. The effect of amino nitrogen on the energetic of ruminal bacteria and its impact on energy spill-ing. J Dairy Sci. 1996; 79: 1237-1243. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(96)76476-7

Sylvester JT, Karnati SK, Yu Z, Newbold CJ, Firkins JL. Evalu-ation of a real-time PCR assay quantifying the ruminal pool size and duodenal flow of protozoal nitrogen. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88: 2083-2095. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72885-X

Ashwin K, Srinivas B. Effect of Vitamin Supplements on in Vitro Fermentation, in Vivo Microbial Protein Synthesis and Milk Production in Deoni Cows. [dissertation]. Bangalore, India: Southern Regional Sta-tion, National Dairy Research Institute; 2015.

Broudiscou L, Jouany JP. Reassessing the manipulation of pro-tein synthesis by rumen microbes. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1995; 35: 517- 535. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19950505

Faniyi TO, Adewumil MK, Prates RE, Ayangbenro AS. Effect of herbs and spices (plant extracts) on rumen microbial activities. PUBVET. 2016; 10: 477-486. doi: 10.22256/pubvet.v10n6

Callaway TR, Edrington TS, Rychlik JL, et al. Ionophores: Their use as ruminant growth promotants and impact on food safety. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2003; 4: 43-51.

Farquhar AS. Kinetics of Alfalfa Nitrogen and Cell Wall Disappear-ance from Ruminallyincubated Dacron Bags. [dissertation]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Iowa State University; 1985.

Elizalde JC, Cremin JD, Faulkner DB, Merchen NR. Perfor-34 Sali K, et al mance and digestion by steers grazing tall Fescue and supplement-ed with energy and protein. J Anim Sci. 1998; 76: 1691-1701. doi: 10.2527/1998.7661691x

Carruthers VR, Neil PG, Dalley DE. Effect of altering the non-structural: Structural carbohydrate ratio in a pasture diet on milk production and ruminal metabolites in cows in early and late lactation. Anim Sci. 1997; 64, 393-402. doi: 10.1017/ S1357729800015988

Harstad OM, Vik-Mo L. Estimation of microbial and unde-graded protein in sheep on grass silage based diets. Acta Agriculturñ Scandinavica. 1985; 25: 37-48.

Rooke JA, Brett PA, Overend MA, Armstrong DG. The en-ergetic efficiency of rumen microbial protein synthesis in cattle given silage-based diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1985; 13: 255-267. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(85)90028-8

Charmley E, Veira DM, Butler G, Aroeira L, Codagnone HCV. The effect of frequency of feeding and supplementation with su-crose on ruminal fermentation of alfalfa silage given adlibitum or restricted to sheep. Can J Anim Sci. 1991; 71: 725-737. doi: 10.4141/ cjas91-088

Klieve AV, Bain PA, Yokoyama MT, Ouwerkerk D, Forster RJ, Turner AF. Bacteriophages that infect the cellulolytic ruminal bacterium Ruminococcusalbus AR67. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004; 38: 333-338. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01493.x

Klieve AV, Gilbert RA. Bacteriophage populations. In: Makkar HPS, McSweeney CS, eds. Methods in Gut Microbial Ecology for Ru-minants. New York City, USA: Springer Publishing; 2005: 129-137.

Firkins JL, Weiss WP, Piwonka EJ. Quantification of intrarumi-nal recycling of microbial nitrogen using nitrogen-15. J Anim Sci. 1992; 70(10): 3223-3233. doi: 10.2527/1992.70103223x

Swain, RA, Klieve AV, Nolan JV. Factors affecting the rumen bacteriophage population. Proc. Aust. Sot. Anim. Prod. 1996; 21: 408.

Williams AG, Coleman GS. The Rumen Protozoa. New York, USA: Springer Publishing; 1992.

Belanche A, de la Fuente G, Pinloche E, Newbold CJ, Balcells J. Effect of diet and absence of protozoa on the rumen microbial community and on the representativeness of bacterial fractions used in the determination of microbial protein synthesis. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90: 3924-3936. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4802

Karnati SKR., Sylvester JT, Ribeiro CVDM, Gilligan LE, Fir-kins JL. Investigating unsaturated fat, monensin, or bromoeth-anesulfonate in continuous cultures retaining ruminal protozoa. I. Fermentation, biohydrogenation, and microbial protein synthesis. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92: 3849-3860. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1436

Demeyer DI, Fiedler D, DeGraeve KG. Attempted induction Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| of reductive acetogenesis into the rumen fermentation in vitro. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1996; 36: 233-240. doi: 10.1051/rnd: 1996 0301

Stanford K., Bach SJ, Stephens TP, Mcallister TA. Effect of ru-men protozoa on Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the rumen and feces of specifically faunated sheep. J Food Prot. 2010; 73: 2197-2202. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-73.12.2197

Carlson SA, Sharma VK., McCuddin ZP, Rasmussen MA, Franklin SK. Involvement of a Salmonella genomic island 1 gene in the rumen protozoan-mediated enhancement of invasion for mul-tiple-antibiotic-resistant Salmonella entericaserovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2007; 75: 792-800. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00679-06

Holtshausen L, Cruywagen CW. The effect of age on in sac-coestimates of rumen dry matter and crude protein degradability in veal calves. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 30: 212-219.

Ørskov ER, Hughes-Jones M, Elimam ME. Studies on deg-radation and outflow rate of protein supplements in the ru-men of sheep and cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1983; 10: 17-24. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(83)90003-9

Bell AW. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J Anim Sci. 1995; 73: 2804-2819. doi: 10.2527/1995.7392804x

Wang X, Li X, Zhao C, et al. Correlation between composi-tion of the bacterial community and concentration of volatile fatty Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Sali K, et al acids in the rumen during the transition period and ketosis in dairy cows. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78: 2386-2392. doi: 10.1128/ AEM.07545-11

Jewell KA, McCormick CA, Odt CL, Weimer PJ, Suen G. Ru-minal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed effi-ciency. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81: 4697-4710. doi: 10.1128/ AEM.00720-15

Pratesa LL, Valadaresa RFD, Valadares Filhob SC, et al. In-vestigating the effects of sex of growing Nellore cattle and crude protein intake on the utilization of recycled N for microbial pro-tein synthesis in the rumen by using intravenous 15N15N-urea infusion. J Ani Fed Sci. 2017; 231: 119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeed-sci.2017.06.014

Carenzi C, Verga M. Animal welfare: Review of the scientific concept and definition. Ital J Anim Sci. 2009; 8: 21-30. doi: 10.4081/ ijas.2009.s1.21

Minuti A, Ahmed S, Trevisi E, et al. Experimental acute acido-sis in sheep: Consequences on clinical, rumen, and gastrointestinal permeability conditions and blood chemistry. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92: 3966-3077. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7594

Kadzere CT, Murphy MR, Silanikove N, Maltz E. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002; 77: 59-91. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X

Downloads

Published

2019-08-01

How to Cite

Abdukarim Y. Harun, & Kedir Sali. (2019). Factors Affecting Rumen Microbial Protein Synthesis: A Review. Veterinary  Medicine, 4(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-4-133

Issue

Section

Articles