Developmental Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Alters the Epigenome: Identification of Reprogrammed Targets

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Lauren Prusinski Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • Ayman Al-Hendy Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • Qiwei Yang Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-127

Keywords:

Developmental environmental exposure, Endocrine disrupting chemicals, Epigenetics, Prostate, Fibroids

Abstract

Endocrine disruptions induced by environmental toxicants have placed an immense burden on society to properly diagnose, treat and attempt to alleviate symptoms and disease. Environmental exposures during critical periods of development can permanently reprogram normal physiological responses, thereby increasing susceptibility to disease later in life – a process known as developmental reprogramming. During development, organogenesis and tissue differentiation occur through a continuous series of tightly regulated and precisely-timed molecular, bio chemical and cellular events. Humans may encounter Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) daily and during all stages of life, from conception and fetal development through adulthood and senescence. Though puberty and perimenopausal periods may be affected by endocrine disruption due to hormonal effects, prenatal and early postnatal windows are most critical for proper development due to rapid changes in system growth. Developmental reprogramming is shown to be caused by alterations in the epigenome. Development is the time when epigenetic programs are ‘installed’ on the genome by ‘writers’, such as histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), which add methyl groups to lysine and arginine residues on histone tails and to CpG sites in DNA, respectively. A number of environmental compounds, referred to as Estrogenic Endocrine Disruptors (EEDs), are able to bind to Estrogen Receptors (ERs) and interfere with the normal cellular development in target tissues including the prostate and uterus. These EEDs, including diethylstilbestrol (DES), bisphenol A (BPA), and genistein (a phytoestrogen derived from soybeans), have been implicated in the malformation of reproductive organs and later development of disease. Due to the lack of fully understanding the underlying mechanisms of how environmental toxicants and their level of exposure affect the human genome, it can be challenging to create clear clinical guidance to address the potential health effects of lower-level exposures commonly experienced within the general population. In addition, human studies concerning environmental exposures are limited in feasibility by ethical concerns for human safety. Therefore, studies in animal models provide great opportunities to reveal links between early-life exposure to EDCs and related diseases. It has been shown that developmental exposure to EDCs, such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) and genistein, during reproductive tract development increases the incidence, multiplicity and overall size of uterine fibroids in the Eker rat model, concomitantly reprogramming estrogen-responsive gene expression. Importantly, EDC exposure represses enhancer of zeste 2 (EZH2) and reduces levels of the histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) repressive mark through Estrogen receptor/Phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases/Protein kinase B non-genomic signaling in the developing uterus. More recent research identified a developmental reprogramming target, Scbg2a1 gene, whose epigenetic status can be altered by early exposure to BPA in the rat prostate. Molecular analyses revealed markedly increased expression (greater than 100 fold) of Scgb2a1, a secretaglobin gene in response to developmental exposure to BPA. This increase in Scgb2a1 expression is concomitantly associated with increased enrichment of acetylated H3K9 (H3K9Ac representing active chromatin status) and hypomethylation of DNA for a CpG island upstream of the transcription start site of Scgb2a1. These data suggest that expression of Scgb2a1 in the adult prostate could be epigenetically reprogrammed by BPA exposure during prostate development. Further studies are needed to create more targeted preventative interventions as well as specific, effective therapeutics to decrease the incidence of diseases.

References

Heindel JJ. Role of exposure to environmental chemicals in the developmental basis of reproductive disease and dysfunc-tion. Semin Reprod Med. 2006; 24(3): 168-177. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944423

Walker CL, Ho SM. Developmental reprogramming of can-cer susceptibility. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012; 12(7): 479-486. doi: 10.1038/nrc3220

Trasande L, Zoeller RT, Hass U, et al. Estimating burden and disease costs of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemi-cals in the European union. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100(4):1245-1255. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4324

Gore AC, Heindel JJ, Zoeller RT. Endocrine disruption for en-docrinologists (and others). Endocrinology. 2006; 147(6 Suppl): S1-S3. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1367

Crews D, McLachlan JA. Epigenetics, evolution, endocrine disruption, health, and disease. Endocrinology. 2006; 147(6 Suppl): S4-S10 doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1122

Chevalier N, Fenichel P. Endocrine disruptors: new players in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Metab. 2015; 41(2): 107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.09.005

Roseboom TJ. Undernutrition during fetal life and the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Future cardiology. 2012; 8(1): 5-7. doi: 10.2217/fca.11.86

Cook JD, Davis BJ, Cai SL, Barrett JC, Conti CJ, Walker CL. Interaction between genetic susceptibility and early-life en-vironmental exposure determines tumor-suppressor-gene pen-etrance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(24): 8644-8649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503218102

Cook JDA, Davis BJ, Goewey JA, Berry TD, Walker CL. Iden-tification of a sensitive period for developmental programming that increases risk for uterine leiomyoma in Eker rats. Reprod Sci. 2007; 14(2): 121-136. doi: 10.1177/1933719106298401

Bernal AJ, Jirtle RL. Epigenomic disruption: the effects of early developmental exposures. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010; 88(10): 938-944. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20685

Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. American journal of human genetics. 2003; 72(5):1117-1130. doi: 10.1086/375033

Heller K. Genetic counseling: DNA testing for the patient. Proceedings. 2005; 18(2):134-137. Web site. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1200714/. Accessed February 17, 2016.

Ly L, Chan D, Trasler JM. Developmental windows of sus-ceptibility for epigenetic inheritance through the male germ-line. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015; 43: 96-105 doi: 10.1016/j. semcdb.2015.07.006

Sandovici I, Hammerle CM, Ozanne SE, Constancia M. Developmental and environmental epigenetic programming of the endocrine pancreas: consequences for type 2 diabetes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 70(9): 1575-1595. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013- 1297-1

Cantone I, Fisher AG. Epigenetic programming and repro-gramming during development. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2013; 20: 282-289 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2489

Li H, Richardson WD. Genetics meets epigenetics: HDACs and Wnt signaling in myelin development and regeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(7): 815-817. doi: 10.1038/nn0709-815

Stuppia L, Franzago M, Ballerini P, Gatta V, Antonucci I. Epigenetics and male reproduction: the consequences of pa-ternal lifestyle on fertility, embryo development, and children lifetime health. Clinical epigenetics. 2015; 7:120 doi: 10.1186/ s13148-015-0155-4

Rasmussen TP. The epigenetics of early development: infer-ences from stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 2014; 81(2): 194-201. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22269

Van de Vijver G, Van Speybroeck L, De Waele D. Epi-genetics: a challenge for genetics, evolution, and develop-ment? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 981:1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749- 6632.2002.tb04909.x

Trevino LS, Wang Q, Walker CL. Phosphorylation of epi-genetic "readers, writers and erasers": Implications for devel-opmental reprogramming and the epigenetic basis for health and disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015; 118(1-2): 8-13 doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.02.013

Dawson MA, Kouzarides T, Huntly BJ. Targeting epigenetic readers in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(7): 647-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1112635

Berdasco M, Esteller M. Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. Dev Cell. 2010; 19(5): 698-711. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.005

Ruthenburg AJ, Li H, Patel DJ, Allis CD. Multivalent en-gagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding mod-ules. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8(12): 983-994. doi: 10.1038/ nrm2298

Tan L, Shi YG. Tet family proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcy-tosine in development and disease. Development. 2012; 139(11): 1895-1902. doi: 10.1242/dev.070771

Yang Q, Mas A, Diamond MP, Al-Hendy A. The Mech-anism and Function of Epigenetics in Uterine Leiomyo-ma Development. Reprod Sci. 2015; 23(2): 163-175. doi: 10.1177/1933719115584449

Bredfeldt TG, Greathouse KL, Safe SH, Hung MC, Bedford MT, Walker CL. Xenoestrogen-induced regulation of EZH2 and histone methylation via estrogen receptor signaling to PI3K/ AKT. Mol Endocrinol. 2010; 24(5): 993-1006. doi: 10.1210/ me.2009-0438

Greathouse KL, Bredfeldt T, Everitt JI,et al. Environmen-tal estrogens differentially engage the histone methyltransferase EZH2 to increase risk of uterine tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2012; 10(4): 546-557. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786

Huang Y, Rao A. Connections between TET proteins and ab-errant DNA modification in cancer. Trends Genet. 2014; 30(10): 464-474. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.005

Prins GS, Hu WY, Shi GB, et al. Bisphenol A promotes hu-man prostate stem-progenitor cell self-renewal and increases in vivo carcinogenesis in human prostate epithelium. Endocrinol-ogy. 2014; 155(3): 805-817. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1955

Wong RL, Wang Q, Trevino LS, et al. Identification of secre-taglobin Scgb2a1 as a target for developmental reprogramming by BPA in the rat prostate. Epigenetics. 2015; 10(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1009768

Downloads

Published

2016-05-03

How to Cite

Lauren Prusinski, Ayman Al-Hendy, & Qiwei Yang. (2016). Developmental Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Alters the Epigenome: Identification of Reprogrammed Targets. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-3-127