Treatment of Osteoporotic Spine Fractures Using Cement Augmentation: A Mini Review

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Abdulrazzaq Alobaid, MD, FRCSC Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization (KIMS), P.O. Box 1160, Surra 45712, Kuwait

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/ORTOJ-2-106

Keywords:

bisphosphonates, calcitonin

Abstract

Vertebral body compression fractures due to osteoporosis is the most common fracture in patients with osteoporosis.1
It affects significantly the quality of life (QoL) and is associated with
pain interfering with activities of daily living. The management of osteoporotic vertebral body
fracture could be surgical or non-surgical. Medical treatment is focused on better mineralization of bone to stop osteoporosis or to improve the quality of bone. Any underlying metabolic
abnormalities and provision of supplemental calcium/vitamin D in conjunction with bisphosphonates or calcitonin, or both. Routine hormone replacement therapy has fallen out of favor
because of concerns regarding adverse effects identified in long-term follow-up studies. In
many cases, the vertebral body fracture is significant and requires surgical intervention. This
can be achieved by sagittal alignment correction and vertebral body height restoration utilizing
pedicle screw instrumentation or by using cement augmentation. This article will focus on cement augmentation options.

References

Bolster MB. Consternation and questions about two vertebro-plasty trials. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010; 77(1): 12-16. doi: 10.3949/ ccjm.77a.09161

Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 569-579. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563

Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral frac-tures. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 557-568. doi: 10.1056/NEJ-Moa0900429

Lapras C, Mottolese C, Deruty R, Lapras C Jr, Remond J, Duquesnel J. Percutaneous injection of methyl-metacrylate in osteoporosis and severe vertebral osteolysis (Galibert’s technic) [In French]. Ann Chir. 1989: 371-376.

Santiago FR, Chinchilla AS, Álvarez LG, et al. Comparative review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. World J Radiol. 2014; 6(6): 329-343. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.329

Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful os-teoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26: 1511-1515. Web site. http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/ Abstract/2001/07150/New_Technologies_in_Spine__Kypho-plasty_and.2.aspx. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Duncan TD, Garfin SR, Wong WH. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correc-tion of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. Clin Imaging. 2002; 26: 1-5. doi: 10.1016/S0899- 7071(01)00350-3

Lane JM, Girardi F, Parvaianen H. Preliminary outcomes of the first 226 consecutive kyphoplasties for the fixation of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Osteoporo-sis Int. 2000; 11: S206.

Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U. Vertebro-plasty and kyphoplasty: A systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17): 1983-2001. doi:

1097/01.brs.0000229254.89952.6b 10. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of pain-ful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001; 26: 1631-1638. Web site. http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/ Abstract/2001/07150/Initial_Outcome_and_Efficacy_of__Ky-phoplasty__in.26.aspx. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Mathis JM, Ortiz AO, Zoarski GH. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: A comparison and contrast. AJNR Am J Neuro-radiol. 2004; 25: 840-845. Web site. http://www.ajnr.org/con-tent/25/5/840.long. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Olan WJ. Kyphoplasty: Balloon-assisted vertebroplasty. ASNR Spine Symposium. 2002: 115-117.

Wilson DR, Myers ER, Mathis JM, et al. Effect of augmenta-tion on the mechanics of vertebral wedge fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(2): 158-165.

Phillips FM, Wetze FT, Lieberman I, Campbell-Hupp M. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral ce-ment leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine. 2002; 27: 2173-2179. Web site. http://www.ossano.com/Bibliotek/ VerteKyphoPlastik/L08%20Phillips.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Mathis JM. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: Complication avoidance and technique optimization. AJNR Am J Neurora-diol. 2003; 24: 1697-1706. Web site. http://www.ajnr.org/con-tent/24/8/1697.long. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. An ex vivo biome-chanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treat-ment of compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26: 151-156. Web site. http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/ Abstract/2001/01150/An_Ex_Vivo_Biomechanical_Evalua-tion_of_an.8.aspx. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Teng MMH, Wei CJ, Wei LC, et al. Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24: 1893-1900. Web site. http://www. ajnr.org/content/24/9/1893.long. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Du J, Li X, Lin X. Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression frac-tures: Two-year follow-up in a prospective controlled study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2014; 80: 477-486. Web site. https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26280719. Accessed October 16, 2016.

Zhou J-I, Liu S-Q, Ming J-H, Peng H. Comparison of therapeutic effect between percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty on vertebral compression fracture. Chinese Jouml of Traumatology. 2008; 11(1): 42-44. doi: 10.1016/S1008- 1275(08)60009-7

Gu CN, Brinjikji W, Evans AJ, Murad MH, Kallmes DF. Outcomes of vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty: A sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; 8(6): 636-642. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011714

Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compres-sion fracture: A prospective, comparative, and randomized clini-cal study. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21(2): 359-364. doi: 10.1007/ s00198-009-0952-8

Schofer MD, Efe T, Timmesfeld N, Kortmann HR, Quante M. Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treat-ment of fresh vertebral compression fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129: 1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009- 0901-1

Evans AJ, Kip KE, Brinjikji W, et al. Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; 8: 756-763. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811

Al-Qazaz MY, Elshafey TE. Comparison of therapeutic ef-fect between percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty on vertebral compression fracture. Med J Cairo Univ. 2012; 80(1): 209-212.

Li X, Yang H, Tang T, Qian Z, Chen L, Zhang Z. Compari-son of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Twelve-month follow-up in a prospective nonrandomized comparative study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 25(3): 142-149. doi: 10.1097/ BSD.0b013e318213c113

Alobaid A. Device and method to prevent extravasation of bone cement used in ballon kyphoplasty. USA: Litman, Richard C; 2014.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-22

How to Cite

Abdulrazzaq Alobaid, MD, FRCSC. (2016). Treatment of Osteoporotic Spine Fractures Using Cement Augmentation: A Mini Review. Orthopedics Research and Traumatology , 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17140/ORTOJ-2-106

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)