The Use of Navigation In Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/ORTOJ-1-104Keywords:
operative, MIS navigationAbstract
Spine surgery is among the surgical specialities that is evolving tremendously and rapidly. The advancements in technology and diagnostic tools opened new era of spine surgery. The rapid growth in the implant industry delivered novel techniques, at the same time more confusion on the proper choice of surgical technique or implant. Although there is no consensus on the gold standard on many spine procedures, it’s acceptable to say that the conventional open techniques are the most widely used by spine surgeons. One of the issues of spine instrumentations is screw mal position that was as high as 42% in some reports.
References
Park P, Foley KT, Cowan JA, Marca FL. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation utilizing O-arm fluoroscopy with com-puter-assisted navigation: Feasibility, technique, and prelimi-nary results. Surg Neurol Int. 2010; 1: 44. doi: 10.4103/2152- 7806.68705
Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klingenberg EO, Li-eberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percu-taneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011; 24(4): 264-267. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181eed618
Foley KT, David A, Simon Y, Rampersaud R. Virtual fluoros-copy: computer assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine. 2001; 26(4): 347-351. Web site. http://journals.lww.com/spinejour-nal/Abstract/2001/02150/Virtual_Fluoroscopy__Computer_ Assisted.9.aspx. Accessed March 23, 2016
Terrence T, Kim TT, Drazin D, Shweikhe F, Pashman R, Johnson PJ. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw placement with intraopera-tive CT (O-arm) image guidance navigation. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 36(3): El. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13531
Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, Hartl R. Pedicle screw naviga-tion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg spine. 2012; 17(2): 113-122. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.SPINE11399
Wood MJ, Mannion RJ. Improving accuracy and reducing ra-diation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 12(5): 533-539. doi: 10.3171/2009.11. SPINE09270
Hartl R, Lham K, Wang J, Korge A, Kandziora F. The AOSpine ANEG (Access and Navigation Expert Group) survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery. Presented at the Global Spine Congress 2011, Barcelona, Spain, 2011; 23-26. Web site. http:// w3.cns.org/dp/2011DSPN/409.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2016 Orthop Res Traumatol Open J
Costa F, Tomei M, Sassi M, et al. Evaluation of the rate of decompression in anterior cervical corpectomy using an intra-operative computerized tomography scan (O-arm). Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(2): 359-363. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2028-7
Kim J-S, Eun SS, Prada N, Choi G, Lee S-H. Modified trans-corporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy assisted by O-arm-based navigation: a technical case report. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 2: S147-S152. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1454-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Orthopedics Research and Traumatology (ORT) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
