The Symbolism as a Cheap Channel Code: The Symbolic Language’s Role in Cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-2-109Keywords:
Brain processing limits, Information theory, Number guessing experiment, Symbolic languageAbstract
There are different ways in which human beings cognitively handle sources of information. Tasks, such as number guessing, velocity, weight, and extension estimation, can be accomplished through different cognitive strategies – e.g. by counting, or comparing objects’
characteristics, and so on. In most cases, these different ways imply different performances and costs to the subject. We offer an interpretation of these “different ways” in terms of different channel codes through which the environmental information is processed by the Central Nervous System (CNS). By considering the channel code’s cost and performance, we will distinguish among three categories of codes; prompt processing, working memory, and symbolic coding scheme. The interpretation seems to provide explanations to important questions, such as: Why do we have the internal representation that we have – in terms of colors, extension,
and texture? Why are simple theories considered better than complex ones? Why do different representations of a given system, even if conflicting, result in the same action plans (experiments)
References
Arbib MA. Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control: Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Mo-tor Control. Comprehensive Physiology. 1981; 1449-480. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp010233
Fuster JM. The Cognit: A network model of cortical represen-tation. Int J Psycho phys. 2006; 60(2): 125-132. doi: 10.1016/j. ijpsycho.2005.12.015
Galatolo S, Hoyrup M, Rojas C. Effective symbolic dynam-ics, random points, statistical behavior, complexity and entro-py. Information and Computation. 2008; 208(1): 23-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ic.2009.05.001
Kandel E. The Age of Insight: The quest to understand the unconscious in art, mind and brain, from Vienna 1900 to the present. New York, USA: Handle House; 2012.
Llinas R. The I of the Vortex: from neuron to self. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press; 2001.
Sperry RW. Neurology and the Mind-Brain Problem. Ameri-can Scientist. 1952; 40(2): 291-312. Web site. http://www.js-tor.org/stable/27826433?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true& searchText=Neurology&searchText=and&searchText=the&s earchText=Mind-Brain&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicS earch%3FQuery%3DNeurology%2Band%2Bthe%2BMind-Brain&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed January 13, 2016.
Dehaene S. Variety of numerical abilities. Cognition. 1992; 44(1-2): 1-42. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
Cover TM, Thomas JA. Elements Information Theory. Hobo-ken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
Dantzig T. Number: The Language of Science. New York, USA: The Free Press; 1967.
Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev. 1994; 101(1): 80-102. Web site. http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8121961. Accessed January 13, 2016.
Harris JM, Dean PJ. Accuracy and Precision of Binocular 3-D Motion Perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003; 29(5): 869-881. Web site. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/14585011. Accessed January 13, 2016.
Barlow HB. Retinal noise and absolute threshold. J Opt Soc Am. 1956; 46(8): 634-639. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.46.000634
Barlow HB. Retinal and Central Factors in Human Vision Limited by Noise. New York, USA: Academic; 1977: 533-545.
Banks MS, Geisler WS, Bennett PJ. The physical limits of grating visibility. Vision Res. 1987; 27(11): 1915-1924. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90057-5
Bialek W, Owen WG. Temporal filtering in retinal bipolar cells. Elements of an optimal computation? Biophys J. 1990; 58(5): 1227-1233. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82463-2
Chaitin GJ. On the simplicity and speed of programs for computing infinite sets of natural numbers. JACM. 1969; 16(3): 407-422. doi: 10.1145/321526.321530
Lillywhite PG. Multiplicative intrinsic noise and the limits to visual performance. Vision Res. 1981; 21(2): 291-296. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90123-1
Kaufman EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J. The dis-crimination of visual number. Am J Psychol. 1949; 62(4): 498- 525. doi: 10.2307/1418556
Dehaene S. The Number Sense: How Mind Creates Math-ematics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1976: 10016.
Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of Neural Science. 5th ed. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
RepovŠ G, Baddeley AD. Multi-component model of work-ing memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychol-ogy. Neuroscience. 2006; 139(1): 5-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neurosci-ence.2005.12.061
Baddeley A. Working memory, theories models and contro-versy. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 63: 1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
Baddeley A. Working memory. Current Bio. 2010; 255(5044): 556-559. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359
Awh E, Jonides J, Smith EE, Schumacher EH, Koeppe RA, Katz S. Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory. Psychol Sci. 1996; 7(1): 25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.1996.tb00662.x
HeilbronR JL. Civilized: History, Culture, and Technique. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
Henson RNA. Neural working memory: applications of the Working Memory model to neuropsychology and neuroimaging. In: Andrade J, ed. Working Memory: A Work in Progress. Lon-don, UK: Routledge; 2001: 151-173.
Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature. 1993; 362(6418): 342-345. doi: 10.1038/362342a0
Smith EE, Jonides J. Working memory: a view from neu-roimaging. Cogn Psychol. 1997; 33(1): 5-42. doi: 10.1006/ cogp.1997.0658
Kolmogorov GAN. On Tables of Random Numbers. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002). 1963; 25(4): 369-375. Web site. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25049284 ?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=On&searchTe xt=Tables&searchText=of&searchText=Random&searchText= Numbers&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery %3DOn%2BTables%2Bof%2BRandom%2BNumbers&seq=1# page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed January 13, 2016.
Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term mem-ory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(1): 87-114; discussion 114-185. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359277
Cowan N. Working Memory Capacity. New York, USA: Psychology Press; 2000.
Luck SJ, Vogel EK. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature. 1997; 390: 279-281. doi: 10.1038/36846
Menninger K. Number Words and Number Symbols: A Cul-tural History of Numbers. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press; 1969.
Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 101(2): 81-97. Web site. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/13310704. Accessed January 13, 2016.
Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(2): 106-111. doi: 10.1111/j.0963- 7214.2004.01502006.x
Cole HA, Welsh A. Acoustic masking in primary memory. J Verb Learning and Verbal Behav. 1976; 15(1): 17-31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90003-7
Dehaene S, Cohen L. Two mental calculation systems: a case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation. Neu-ropsychologia. 1991; 29(11): 1045-1074. doi: 10.1016/0028- 3932(91)90076-K
Vázquez JL. The importance of mathematics in the develop-ment of science and technology. Boletín Soc Esp Mat Aplicada. 2001; 19: 69-112.
Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E. The Embodied Mind: Cog-nitive Science and Human Experience. MA, USA: MIT Press; 1993.
Sakitt B. Counting every quantum. J Physiol. 1972; 223: 131-150. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009838
Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Labs Tech J. 1948; 27: 379-423, 623-656. doi: 10.1002/j.1538- 7305.1948.tb01338.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
