Virtual Acute Stress Reaction in a Treatment Team Following a Family Meeting of “Potentates”: Measures of Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-3-129Keywords:
Potentates, Projective identification, Acute stress reaction (ASR), Family meeting, DynamicsAbstract
Background: Volumes have been published on “difficult” patients and their representatives; however, there is sparse literature available as to how a “difficult” patient or a provocative family encounter is experienced by a team of members across various disciplines, associated with the treatment. We report a case to present our experience with “potentates”, a type of “difficult” client, which could help draw suggestions to allow for prevention in more generalized situations.
Objective: To identify strategies that would help avoid occurrences and minimize the negative impacts possibly associated with the responses of the “potentates” towards the treatment team.
Method: The medical case of a 21-year-old female inpatient with provocative psychopathology was presented, initially evoked as a reaction towards her family followed by a state of intense anger and a tendency of being accusatory towards the treatment team during a family meeting. The patient’s response thus led the members of the treatment team to experience signs and symptoms commonly associated with virtual acute stress reaction (ASR).
Results: We analyzed the outcome of the interaction between the patient and the treatment team during the meeting, reviewed the literature relevant to pre-existing research in this domain, and concluded that there could be possible helpful strategies and measures that could be implemented in family meetings to prevent the possibility of virtual ASR. This case report paves the path for further research to ensure the protection of multidisciplinary teams under various clinical settings.
Discussion: A treatment team is potentially vulnerable to physical, verbal, psychodynamic and other commonly implemented modes of attack from patients and their representatives. Appropriate measures need to be implemented with the objective to prevent and minimize the effect of these attacks on the treatment team.
References
American Psychiatric Association. The Diagnostic and Sta-tistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). 4th ed. Lake St. Louis, MO, USA: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
Groves JE, Dunderdale BA, Stern TA. Celebrity patients, VIPS, and potentates. Primary Care Companion J Clin Psychia-try. 2002; 4(6): 215-223. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v04n0602
Kibel HD. Contributions of the group psychotherapist to education on the psychiatric unit: Teaching through group dynamics. Int J Group Psychother. 1987; 37(1): 3-29. doi: 10.1080/00207284.1987.11491038
Kibel HD. Interpretive work in milieu groups. Int J Group Psy-chother. 2003; 53(3): 303-329. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.53.3.303.42821
Schwarz RM, Bass J. The Skilled Facilitator: “Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups”: San Francisco, CA, USA: Wiley: Jossey-Bass; 1994: 336.
Doyle M, Strauss D. How to Make Meetings Work. New York, USA: Jove Books; 1982.
Yalom ID. Problem Patients in “The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy”: New York, USA and London, UK: Basic Books; 1970.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.