Epistemic Curiosity, Conceptual Ambiguity and Cognitive Conflict: Do these Implicate Students Exploratory Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-3-135Keywords:
Epistemic curiosity, Cognitive dissonance, Exploratory behavior, Feeling-ofknowingAbstract
Background: Contemporary demands in the labour market continue to be more scientifictechnological. Onus is on institutions of higher learning to develop in students’ flexibility of thinking, as well as an inquiring and inquisitive mindset, that would stimulate in them the culture for curiosity and scientific research. Consequently, this paper establishes a link of cognitive/educational psychology research to epistemic curiosity and human exploratory behavior in postgraduate students attending educational psychology classes, to assess how epistemic curiosity implicates their inquiry and affects critical thinking for classroom practice. Method: A total of two hundred (200) random sampling size of students’ in a university, located in the middle belt of Ghana, aged between 24-30 years, participated in this study. They were tested to assess the discrepancy between their feel-of-knowing on three variables: general fluid reasoning, memory test recognition and curiosity-trait questionnaire. Results: Participants with high intensity level to knowledge demonstrated lower knowledge gap, compared to those with low-level of intensity. Similarly, the lower the knowledge gap between curiosity and cognition, the higher the arousal indicating that the ‘I know’ experienced acute stimulation relative to the ‘I don’t know’ participants. In the experiments performed, scores of the ‘I know’ group correlated more positively with epistemic curiosity, feelings of
knowing and exploratory behavior than the ‘I don’t know’ individuals. Conclusion: Human cognitive architecture seems to be structured to avoid cognitive ambiguity. Interest and deprivation-type curiosity in humans appears to be the leading predicting factor
inducing humans to search for answers to bridge the gap between cognition and cognitive dissonance, triggering exploratory behavior to find answers.
References
Berlyne DE. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; 1960. doi: 10.1037/11164-000
Berlyne DE. A theory of human curiosity. Br J Psychol. 1954; 45: 180-191. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954.tb01243.x
Berlyne DE. Curiosity and exploration. Science. 1966; 153: 25-33. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3731.25
Loewenstein G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychol Bull. 1994; 116: 75-98. doi: doi: 10.10 17/thg.2012.11
Litman JA, Spielberger CD. Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. J Pers Assess. 2003; 80(1): 75-86. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
Litman JA, Jimerson TL. Curiosity as a feeling-of-deprivation. J Pers Assess. 2004; 82: 147-157. doi: 10.1207/s15327752 jpa8202_3
Brown R, McNeil D. The ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1966; 5: 325-337. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5371(66)80040-3
Eysenck MW. The feeling of knowing a word’s meaning. Br J Psychol. 1979; 70: 243-251. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979. tb01681.x
Hart JT. Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. J Educ Psychol. 1965; 56: 208-2216. doi: 10.1037/h0022263
Berlyne DE. The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. J Exp Psychol. 1958; 55: 289-296. doi: 10.1037/h0043555
Henderson B, Moore SG. Measuring exploratory behavior in young children: A factor-analytic study. Developmental Psy-chology. 1979; 15: 113-119. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.15.2.113
Woodcock J. Test Guide. Florida, USA: Riverside; 2017.
Jordan L, Tiffany H, Ryan R. Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behavior. Cogn Emot. 2005; 19(4): 559-582. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000427
Keller H, Schneider K, Henderson B. Preface: The study of exploration. In: Keller H, Schneider K, Henderson B, eds. Curiosity and Exploration. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1994: 199-212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77132-3_1
Litman JA, Museel P. Developmental and validation of German translations of interest and deprivation-type curiosity scales. J Individ Differ. 2013; (34): 59-68. doi: 10.1027/1614- 0001/a000100
von Stumm S, Hell B, Chamorro-Premuzick T. Curiosity predicts academic performance. The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity as third pillar of academic performance. Perspect Psy-chol Sci. 2011; 6(6): 574-588. doi: 10.1177/1745691611421204
Marco L, Jordan AL, Patrick M, Riccardo DS, Howard, MC, Robert RH. Epistemic curiosity and self-regulation. Pers Individ Dif. 2015; 202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.017
Cochran-Smith M, Lytle SL. Inquiry as Stance, Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York, USA: Teachers College Press; 2009.
Leeman Y, Wardekker W. Leren Door een Onderzoekende houding. Zwolle, Netherlands: Hogeschool Windesheim Lector-aat Pedagogische kwaliteit van het onderwijs; 2008.
Leeman Y, Wardekker W. Teacher research and the aim of education. Teachers and Teaching. 2014; 20(1): 45-58. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2013.848516
Berlyne DE. An experimental study of human curiosity. Br J Psychol. 1954; 45: 256-265. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954. tb01253.x
Litman JA. Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences 2008; 44(7): 1585-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
