Relationship of Sustainable Behavior, World-Mindedness, National and Global Identities, Perceived Environmental Risk and Globalization Impact Among College Students in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-4-138Keywords:
Sustainable behavior, World-mindedness, Global identity, Risk perception, GlobalizationAbstract
Purpose
This study examined the relationship of world-minded value orientation, national and global identities, perceived environmental
risk and impact of globalization to self-reported sustainable behavior
Methods
The sample was composed of 298 college students from an ethnically diverse mid-size private university in California (United
States). The variables that were examined as possible predictors of self-reported sustainable behavior were: world-minded value
orientation, global-human and national sense of belonging/identity, perceived environmental risk, and globalization impact in
general and on one’s country. The internal consistency of the measures used to assess the seven variables ranged from 0.73 to
0.83.
Results
The strongest predictors of greater self-reported sustainable behavior were perceived positive general globalization impact and
greater perceived environmental risk, followed by a stronger sense of national belonging/identity and global belonging/identity.
There were notable relationships among the predictor variables: 1) National and global belonging/identities were moderately
correlated suggesting their co-extensive nature rather than polarization, 2) More positive impact of globalization in general and
on one’s country were positively correlated, 3) Stronger world-minded value orientation was related to a stronger sense of global
belonging/identity, and 4) Stronger sense of global belonging/identity was associated with higher perceived environmental risk.
Conclusion
The results are discussed in the context of the superordinate goal theory.
References
Klein N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate Change. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Knopf; 2014.
Kraf ME. Environmental Policy and Politics. 7th ed. New York: NY, USA: Routledge. 2018
Pachauri R, Meye L, eds. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Re-port of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzer-land: IPCC. hdl: 10013/epic.45156.d001. 2014.
Der-Karabetian A, Stephenson K, Poggi T. Environmental risk perception, activism and world-mindedness among samples of British and U.S. college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1996; 83: 451-462. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.451
De Medeiros JF. Environmentally sustainable innovation: Expected attributes in the purchase of green products. Journal of Cleaner Productions. 2017; 142: 240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2016.07.191
Reese G, Kohlmann F. Feeling global, acting ethically: Glob-al identification and Fairtrade consumption. J Soc Psychol. 2015; 155(2): 98-106. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.992850
Tukker A, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM. System Innovation for Sustainability: Perspective on Radical Changes to Sustainable Consumption and Production. New York, NY, USA: Routledge; 2008.
Corral-Verdugo V, Frías-Armenta M, García-Cadena C. Intro-duction to the psychological dimensions of sustainability. In: Cor-ral-Verdugo V, Frías-Armenta M, García-Cadena C, eds. Psycholog-ical Approaches to Sustainability. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers; 2010: 3-18
Juarez-Najera M, Rivers-Martinez JG, Hofkamp WA. An ex-plorative socio-psychological model for determining sustainable behavior: Pilot study in German and Mexican universities. Jour-nal of Cleaner Production. 2010; 18(7): 686-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2009.09.018
Der-Karabetian A, Alfaro M. Psychological predictors of sus-tainable behavior in college samples from the United States, Brazil and the Netherlands. American International Journal of Social Science. 2015; 4(6): 29-39.
Der-Karabetian A, Cao Y, Alfaro M. Sustainable behavior, perceived globalization impact, world-mindedness, identity, and perceived risk in college samples from the United States, Chi-na and Taiwan. Ecopsychology. 2014; 6(4): 218-233. doi: 10.1089/ eco/2014.0035
Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz. Climate change vulner-ability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources: An Interna-tional Journal. 2006; 19: 771-789. doi: 10.1080/08941920600835528
Leung AKY., Koh K, Tam KP. Being environmentally re-sponsible: Cosmopolitan orientation predicts pro-environment behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015; doi: 10.1016/j. jenvp.2015.05.011
McFarland S, Webb M, Brown D. All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology. 2012; 103: 830-853. doi: 10.1037/ a0028724
Devine-Wright P, Price J, Leviston Z. My country or my plan-et? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Global Environmental Change. 2015; 30: 68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.gloen-vcha.2014.10.012
Sherif M. In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin; 1966.
Zhao S. Nation-state by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press; 2004.
Jorgenson A, Kick E, eds. Globalization and the Environment. Bos-ton, MA, USA: Brill; 2006.
Der-Karabetian A. World-mindedness and the nuclear threat: Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ A multinational study. J Soc Behav Pers. 1992; 7: 293-308.
Der-Karabetian A, Ruiz Y. Affective bicultural and global-hu-man identity scale for Mexican-American adolescents. Psychological Reports. 1997; 80: 1027-1039. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3.1027
Devine-Wight P. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachment and place identities in climate changed world. Global Environmental Change. 2012; 23: 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gloen-vcha.2012.08.003
Werff E, Steg L, Keiser K. The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environ-mental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2013; 34: 55-63.
Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Abrahamse W. Values, iden-tity and pro-environment behavior. Contemporary Social Sci-ence: Journal of Academy of Social Sciences. 2012; 12: 1-19. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2012.682086
Pittock AB. Climate Change: Turning up the Heat (ebook). New York, NY, USA: Routledge; 2017.
Arbuthnott KD. Education for sustainable development be-yond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2009; 10(2): 152-163. doi: 10.1108/14676370910945954
Mckensie-Mohr D. Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Cabriela Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers; 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
