How Self-Reflection Influences Use of Cognitive and Analytical Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-6-154Keywords:
Language use, Analytical language, Sex differences in linguisticsAbstract
Objective
We examined cognitive processes and analytic expression according to emotional prime, hypothesizing that negative affect may
increase rumination as seen in analytic language (that is, lead to language of “explaining”), as well as insight and causality, reflecting
language focused on specific reasons.
Method
Sixty-four participants were assigned randomly to write about either “positive aspects of myself ” or “aspects of myself that I would like
to change”. These narratives about positive and negative characteristics were subjected to the linguistic inquiry and word count
(LIWC) in order to examine how the manipulations influenced expression.
Results
More insight and causation in language was seen in participants’ language that focused on positive (rather than negative) aspects
of themselves, but more discrepancy was seen when writing about negative qualities. These findings were not a function of
wordiness.
Conclusion
Causality and insight were prevalent in language after positive prompting, perhaps because people were providing rationale and
support for positive self-talk. Discrepancy suggests counterfactual thought and was common in writing from a negative prompt.
References
Kern M, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, Park G, Ungar LH, Stillwell DJ, et al. From ‘Sooo excited!!!’ to ‘So proud’: Using lan-guage to study development. Dev Psychol. 2014; 50(1): 178-188. doi: 10.1037/a0035048
Pennebaker JW, Boyd, RL, Jordan K, Blackburn, K. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Web site. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/han-dle/2152/31333/LIWC2015_LanguageManual.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2020.
Tausczik Y, Pennebaker J. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Jour-nal Of Language And Social Psychology. 2010; 29(1): 24-54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
Pennebaker, JW. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 14 Brownlow S et al about Us. New York, NY, USA: Bloomsbury Press/Bloomsbury Publishing; 2011.
Jordan KN, Sterling J, Pennebaker, JW, Boyd, RL. Examining long-term political trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(9): 3476-3481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811987116
Brownlow S, Pate M, Alger A, Naturile N. What were they think-ing? Analytic and cognitive language in Instagram captions. Soc Be-hav Res Pract Open J. 2019; 4(1): 21-25. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-4-117
Pennebaker J, Stone L. Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2): 291-301. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.85.2.291
Newman M, Groom C, Handelman L, Pennebaker J. Gender dif-ferences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes. 2008; 45(3): 211-236. doi: 10.1080/01638530802073712
King, LA, Pennebaker JW. Thinking about goals, glue, and the meaning of life. In: Wyer RS Jr, ed. Ruminative Thoughts. Advances on social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1996: 9; 97-106.
Pennebaker, JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. Psychological as-pects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Ann Rev Psychol. 2003: 54: 547-577. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
Soni, D. Supervised vs unsupervised learning. towardsdatasci-ence Web site. https://towardsdatascience.com/supervised-vs-un-supervised-learning-14f68e32ea8d. Accessed June 16, 2020. Brief Research Report | Volume 6 | Number 1 |
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
