A Shared Information Technology-Business-Health Model: Lessons for Healthcare Leaders on Integrating Technology from Investment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-7-159Keywords:
Health care, Business, Information technology, Shared, Leadership;, Understanding, Straight through processingAbstract
Objective: Technology is rapidly shifting our day-to-day existence, education, social relationships, health care and business.
Psychiatric leaders have slowly explored telepsychiatric services – but few have an approach to technology in general–due to
competing clinical, educational and research demands. Technology has typically been added on, rather than integrated, to institutional
functions.
Method: This narrative review used a literature search of Medline, PsycNET, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane, SpringerLink,
Scopus, ABI/Inform, Business Source Complete, and Web of Science, using subject headings and keywords along with a manual
search of reference lists of articles published by November 2020. The keywords explored four areas: 1) business; 2) service
delivery; 3) system change; and 4) technology. Articles were reviewed by title/abstract, full text review and review of references.
They were included if they discussed integration of technology into health care and compared literature from medicine/health,
psychiatry/behavioral health, business, technology, leadership and health care administration. The goal was to explore how
medicine/psychiatry has integrated technology compared to business, and apply business approaches to health care and training.
Results: From a total of 2,710 potential references, two authors found 327 eligible for full text review and found 69 papers
directly relevant to the concepts. Business and medicine/psychiatry have similarities/differences from both historical and contemporary
views. Many health care systems and companies lack a strategic plan for technology and focus only on short-term due
to administrative demands. Clinical informatics is a rapidly expanding area and would be central to this process. It has started to
facilitate patient-centered care as defined by quality, affordable, and timely health care. While in principle information systems
use integrative approaches, electronic health records, electronic means of communications with patients and staff, behavioral
health indicators and related digital advances are often added to existing systems rather than integrated. Effective businesses use
integrative approaches to share domain knowledge and streamline practices to link information technology (IT) with research
and development, production, financing and marketing management. A case example highlights the IT strategy and business
leaders’ comments in shifting to straight through processing (STP) from the banking industry for investments. It also exemplifies
a model of shared IT-business understanding, which improves performance via efficiency, quality of data/information processing/
integration and managerial teamwork.
Conclusion: When it is integrated into health care service delivery workflow, evaluated and quality improved, IT facilitates the
translation of strategic planning into organizational change. Incremental versus strategically innovative approaches to technological
integration for care, education and administration are considered. Successful implementation requires a needs and impact
assessment for patients, staff, clinicians and leaders across all levels of the organization. Benefits to the mission, limited disruptions
of core operational workflow and reasonable costs reduce the likelihood of failure.
References
Pew Research Center, 2019. Mobile Fact Sheet. Web site. https:// www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed De-cember 18, 2020.
Hilty DM, Ferrer D, Callahan EJ, Johnston B, Yellowlees PM. The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemed J E Health. 2013; 19: 444-454. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0075
Hilty DM, Rabinowitz TR, McCarron RM, Katzelnick DJ, Chang T, Bauer A, et al. An update on telepsychiatry and how it can leverage collaborative, stepped, and integrated services to primary care. Psychosomatics. 2018; 59(3): 227-250. doi: 10.1016/j. psym.2017.12.005
Edelman DC. Branding in the digital age: You’re spending your money in all the wrong places. Harvard Business Review, 2010; 63-69.
Hilty DM. Advancing science, clinical care and education: Shall we update Engel’s biopsychosocial model to a bio-psy-cho-socio-cultural model? Psychol Cogn Sci. 2016; 1(1): e1-e6. doi: 10.17140/PCSOJ-1-e001
Ahuja S, Hanlon C, Chisholm D, Semrau M, Gurung D, Abdul-malik J, et al. Experience of implementing new mental health indi-cators within information systems in six low- and middle-income countries. BJPsych Open. 2019; 5(5): e71. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.29
Luxton DD. Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral Health Care. Boston, MA: Elsevier; 2016.
Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, Hasan O, Satele D, Sloan J, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and profes-sional satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2016; 91(7): 836-848. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007
Kuziemsky CE. A model of tradeoffs for understanding health information technology implementation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2015; 215: 116-128. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-560- 9-116
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York, USA: Free Press; 1995.
Emerald Group Publishing Group. Survival through inno-vation: Microsoft and Nintendo strive to offer the latest “must haves.” Strategic Direction; Bradford. 2007; 24(1): 21-24. doi: 10.1108/02580540810839313
Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB. Competing with IT: The role of shared IT-business understanding. Communications of the ACM. 2007; 50: 87-91. doi: 10.1145/1323688.1323700
Handrigan J. Nintendo’s disruptive strategy: Implications for the Video Game Industry. Memorial University of Newfoundland - Marine Institute. Case Study #2. 2013. Web site. http://www. johnpaulhandrigan.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Ninten-dos-Disruptive-Strategy-Implications-for-the-Video-Game-Indus-try.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Rivard S, Pinsonneault A, Croteau AM. Information technolo-gy at Cirque du Soleil: Looking back, moving forward. International Journal of Case Studies in Management. 2012; 10(4): 1-13. 14 Hilty DM et al
Dubois D, Bens K. Ombre, Tie-Dye, Splat Hair: Trends or Fads? “Pull” and “Push” Social Media Strategies at L’Oréal Par -is. 2014. Web site. https://cases.insead.edu/loreal-google/docu-ments/6060-Ombre_LOreal-CS-EN-0-06-2014-w.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodo-logical framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8: 19-32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Ad-vancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5: 69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Corbin J, Morse JM. The unstructured interactive interview: Is-sues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics.Quali-tative Inquiry. 2003; 9: 335-354. doi: 10.1177/1077800403009003001
Gray DE. Doing Research in the Real World. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications; 2009.
Shi L, Singh DA. Delivering Health Care in America: A Systems Ap-proach. 6th ed. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. 2015; 17(40): 195-245.
Dye CF. Leadership in Health Care: Essential Values and Skills. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL, USA: Health Administration Press; 2010.
American Association of Medical Colleges. Academic medi-cine’s three missions of research, education, and patient care are critical to ensuring preparedness. 2015. Web site. https://www. aamc.org/download/446672/data/academicmedicinesthreemis-sionsofresearcheducationandpatientcare.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Value-Based Programs. 2020. Web site. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Qual-ity-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Pro-grams/Value-Based-Programs. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Affordable Care Act (ACA). 2018. Web site. https://www. healthcare.gov/glossary/affordable-care-act/. Accessed Decem-ber 18, 2020.
Hilty DM, Chan S, Torous J, Mahautmr J, Mucic DM. New frontiers in health care and technology: Internet- and web-based mental options emerge to complement in-person and telepsychiat-ric care options. Journal of Health and Medical Informatics. 2015; 6(4): 1-14. doi: 10.4172/2157-7420.1000200
Hilty DM, Torous J, Parish M, Chan S, Xiong G, Scher L, et al. A literature review comparing clinicians’ approaches and skills to in-person, synchronous and asynchronous care: Moving toward asynchronous competencies to ensure quality care. Telemedicine Jour-nal and E-Health. 2020; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0054 Systematic Review | Volume 7 | Number 1 |
deBronkart D. From patient centred to people powered: Au-tonomy on the rise. Br Med J. 2015; 350: 148. doi: 10.1136/bmj. h148
Miles A, Mezzich J. The care of the patient and the soul of the clinic: Person- centered medicine as an emergent model of mod-ern clinical practice. Int J Pers Centered Med. 2011; 1(2): 207-222. doi: 10.5750/ijpcm.v1i2.61
Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, et al. Person- centered care—ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011; 10(4): 248-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008
Aydin CE, Forsythe DE. Implementing computers in ambu-latory care: Implications of physician practice patterns for system design. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997; 677-681.
Terry K. Electronic medical records make sense—at last. Medi-cal Economics. 1999; 76: 134-153.
Hilty DM, Randhawa K, Maheu MM, McKean AS, Pantera R, Rizzo A. A review of telepresence, virtual reality and augmented reality applied to clinical care. J Technol Behav Sci. 2020; 5: 178-205. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00126-x
Liddy C, Drosinis P, Keely E. Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care - a system-atic review. Fam Pract. 2016; 33(3): 274-285. doi: 10.1093/fampra/ cmw024
Archibald D, Stratton J, Liddy C, Grant RE, Green D, Keely EJ. Evaluation of an electronic consultation service in psychiatry for primary care providers. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1): 119. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1701-3
Berrouiguet S, Baca-García E, Brandt S, Walter M, Courtet P. Fundamentals for future mobile-health (mhealth): A systematic re-view of mobile phone and web-based text messaging in mental health. J Med Int Res. 2016; 18(6): e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5066
Pisani AR, Wyman PA, Gurditta K, Schmeelk-Cone K, An-derson CL, Judd E. Mobile phone intervention to reduce youth suicide in rural communities: Field test. JMIR Ment Health. 2018; 5(2): e10425. doi: 10.2196/10425
L’Hommedieu M, L’Hommedieu J, Begay C, Schenone A, Dimitropoulou L, Margolin G, et al. Lessons learned: recommen-dations for implementing a longitudinal study using wearable and environmental sensors in a health care organization. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019; 7(12): e13305. doi: 10.2196/13305
Hilty DM, Armstrong CM, Luxton DD, Gentry M, Krupin-ski E. A framework of sensor, wearable and remote patient moni-toring competencies for clinical care and training: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(2): e12229. doi: 10.2196/12229 Systematic Review | Volume 7 | Number 1 | Hilty DM et al
Hilty DM, Zalpuri I, Stubbe D, Snowdy CE, Shoemaker EZ, Joshi SV, et al. Social media/networking as part of e-behavioral health and psychiatric education: Competencies, teaching meth-ods, and implications. J Technol Behav Sci. 2018; 3(4): 268-293. doi: 10.1007/s41347-018-0061-7
Hilty DM, Crawford A, Teshima J, Chan S, Sunderji N, Yellowlees PM, et al. A framework for telepsychiatric train-ing and e-health: Competency-based education, evaluation and implications. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015; 27(6): 569-592. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292
Hilty DM, Maheu MM, Drude KP, Hertlein KM. The need to implement and evaluate telehealth competency frameworks to ensure quality care across behavioral health professions. Acad Psy-chiatry. 2018; 42(6): 818-824. doi: 10.1007/s40596-018-0992-5
Maheu M, Drude K, Hertlein K, Lipschutz R, Wall K, Hilty DM. An interdisciplinary framework for telebehavioral health competencies. J Technol Behav Sci. 2019; 3(2): 108-140. doi: 10.1007/ s41347-019-00113
Zalpuri I, Liu H, Stubbe D, Wrzosek M, Sadhu J, Hilty D. A competency-based framework for social media for trainees, faculty and others. Academic Psychiatry. 2018; 42(6): 808-817. doi: 10.1007/ s40596-018-0983-6
Hilty DM, Chan S, Torous J, Luo J, Boland R. A telehealth framework for mobile health, smartphones and apps: Competen-cies, training and faculty development. J Technol Behav Sci. 2019; 4(2): 106-123. doi: 10.1007/s41347-019-00091-0
Hilty DM, Chan S, Torous J, Luo J, Boland RJ. A framework for competencies for the use of mobile technologies in psychia-try and medicine. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(2): e12229. doi: 10.2196/12229
Carr DK, Hard KJ, Trahant WJ. Managing the Change Process: A Field Book for Change Agents, Consultants, Team Leaders, and Reengineer-ing Managers. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill. 1996; 115-140.
Mulgan G, Albury D. Innovation in the Public Sector, Strat-egy Unit, Cabinet Office, October 2003. Web site. http://www. sba.oakland.edu/faculty/mathieson/mis524/resources/readings/ innovation/innovation_in_the_public_sector.pdf. Accessed De-cember 18, 2020.
Borins S. The Challenge of Innovating in Government. The Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for The Business of Gov-ernment. 2001. Web site. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/ report/challenge-innovating-government. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Kotter JP. A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Manage-ment. New York, USA: The Free Press; 1990.
Kotter JP. Leading change. Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. 1996; 59-67.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Guilford; 2002.
Backer TE. Managing the human side of change in VA’s trans-formation. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1997; 42: 431-459.
Deming WE. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, England: MIT Press; 1982.
Walton M. The Deming Management Method. New York, USA: Perigee Trade; 1988.
Nadler G, Hibino S, Farrell J. Creative Solution Finding: The Triumph of Breakthrough Thinking Over Conventional Problem Solving. Rocklin, CA, USA: Prima Publications; 1999.
Hilty DM, Unutzer J, Ko D-K, Luo J, Worley LM, Yager J. Approaches for departments, schools and health systems to better implement technologies used for clinical care and education. Acad Psychiatry. 2019; 43: 611-616. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01074-2
Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations. 1993; 46: 681-703. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600601
Marshall J, Conner DR. Another reason why companies resist change. strategy and business. 1996. Web site. http://www.strat-egy-business.com/press/article/8614?pg=0. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Diamond MA. Organizational change as human process, not technique. NIDA research monograph. 1995; 155: 119-131.
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Coro-navirus Resources. Web site. https://www.dol.gov. Accessed Au-gust 20, 2020.
Hagenbaugh B. Nation’s wealth disparity widens. USA To-day. 2002. Web site. http://usatoday.printthis.clickability.com/ pt/cpt?action=cpt&expire=&urlID=5183409&fb=Y&partner-ID=1661. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Hilton B, Balloun J, Weinstein C. Success factors for organiza-tional performance: Comparing business services, health care, and education. SAM Advanced Management Journal. 2005; 70(4): 16-28.
Hee J, Chen Y, Huang W. Straight through processing technolo-gy in global financial market: Readiness assessment and implemen-tation. Journal of Global Information Management. 2003; 11(2): 56-66.
Grody AD. Observations on the new US financial regu-lation challenges to the financial sector: data standardization, 16 Hilty DM et al straight-through-processing and operational risks. Journal of Opera-tional Risk. 2010; 5(3): 23-27.
Sinn B. Straight-through processing helps bolster insur-er data quality, client intelligence. 2009. Web site. https://www. propertycasualty360.com/2009/09/20/straight-through-pro-cessing-helps-bolster-insurer-data-quality-client-intelligence/?slre-turn=20210028203035. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Saccocia C. Placing your technology bets. Insur Tech. 2003; 28(13): 37-41.
Franklin R. Modernizing the back office of the securities indus-try. Computer World. 2000; 34: 11-36.
Mearian L. Trades at top speed. Computer World. 2003; 37(9): 21-24.
Osheroff JA, Teichc JM, Middletone B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(2): 141-145. doi: 10.1197/ jamia.M2334
Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improv-ing clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A sys-tematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition). 2005; 330(7494): 765. doi: 10.1136/bm-j.38398.500764.8F
Natarajan M, Arshad K, Girish N, Sethu G. (). Straight through processing (STP): Prospects and challenges. Journal of Decision Making. 2004; 29(1): 93-100. doi: 10.1177/0256090920040108
The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medi-cine. Health and Medicine Division. 2020. Web site. https://www. nationalacademies.org/hmd/health-and-medicine-division. Ac-cessed December 18, 2020.
Bower JL, Christensen CM. Disruptive Technologies: Catch-ing the Wave. 1995. Web site. https://hbr.org/1995/01/disrup-tive-technologies-catching-the-wave. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Christensen CM, Grossman JH, Hwang J. The Innovators Pre-scription – A Disruptive Solution for Health Care. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill; 2009.
Annunziata VP. Straight-through Processing. Energy Mar-kets. 2001. Web site. https://search-proquest-com.proxy.libraries. uc.edu/docview/228764026?accountid=2909. Accessed Decem-ber 18, 2020.
Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kramer KL. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evi-dence. ACM Computing Surveys. 2003; 35: 1-28. Systematic Review | Volume 7 | Number 1 |
Kohlh R, Devarag S. Measuring information technology pay-off: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empiri-cal research. Information Systems Research. 2003; 14: 127-145. doi: 10.1287/isre.14.2.127.16019
Rai A, Parnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N. Technology investments and business performance. Communication of the ACM. 1997; 40: 89-97. doi: 10.1145/256175.256191
Ross JW. Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper, 4314-03, Center for Information Systems Research Work-ing Paper, No. 335. 2003. Web site. http://dspace.mit.edu/han-dle/1721.1/3526. Accessed December 18, 2020.
Adenuga OA, Kekwaletswe RM, Coleman A. eHealth integra-tion and interoperability issues: Towards a solution through en-terprise architecture. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2015; 3: 1. doi: 10.1186/ s13755-015-0009-7
Holahan PJ, Lesselroth BJ, Adams K, Wang K, Church V. Be-yond technology acceptance to effective technology use: A parsi-monious and actionable model. Journal of the American Medical Infor-matics Association. 2015; 22(3): 718-729. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu043
Mermelstein H, Krupinski E, DeGuzman E, Rabinowitz T, Hilty DM. The application of technology to health: The evolution of telephone to telemedicine and telepsychiatry: A historical re-view and look at human factors. J Technol Behav Sci. 2017; 1(2): 5-20. doi: 10.1007/s41347-017-0010-x
Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran D, Colagiuri R, Fernandez A, Luker-smith S, Torkfar G, et al. Health care frames - from Virchow to Obama and beyond: The changing frames in health care and their implications for patient care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014; 20(6): 1036- 1044. doi: 10.1111/jep.12266
Lal JA, Morré SA, Brand A. The overarching framework of translation and integration into health care: A case for the LAL model. Per Med. 2014; 11(1): 41-62. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.97.13.97
Hilty DM, Chan S. Human behavior with mobile health: Smart-phone/devices, apps and cognition. Psychol Cogn Sci Open J. 2018; 4(2): 36-47. doi: 10.17140/PCSOJ-4-141
Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM. Smartphones and cog-nition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8: 605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
Egan T. The Eight-Second Attention Span. New York, NY, USA: The New York Times.2016
Vukovic V, Favaretti C, Ricciardi W, de Waure C. Health technology assessment evidence on e-health/m-health tech-Systematic Review | Volume 7 | Number 1 | Hilty DM et al nologies: Evaluating the transparency and thoroughness. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018; 34(1), 87-96. doi: 10.1017/ S026646231700451262317004512
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Concep-tual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010; 38(2): 65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488- 010-0319-7
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effec-tiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance pub-lic health impact. Med Care. 2012; 50(3): 217-226. doi: 10.1097/ MLR.0b013e3182408812
Gargon E, Gorst SL, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th an-nual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for re-search. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12): e0225980. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0225980
Kidholm K, Jensen LK, Kjølhede T, Nielsen E, Horup MB. Validity of the model for assessment of telemedicine: A delphi study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2018; 24(2): 118-125. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686553
Cranfield S, Hendy J, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S, Fulop N. Investigating health care IT innovations: A “conceptual blending” approach. Journal of Health Organizational Management. 2015; 29(7): 1131-1148. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2015-0121
Walker DM, Hefner JL, Sieck CJ, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS. Framework for evaluating and implementing inpatient portals: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Medical Systems. 2018; 42(9): 158. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1009-3
Lesselroth B, Adams K, Mastarone G, Tallett S, Ragland S, Laing A, et al. Applying the effective technology use model to implementation of electronic consult management software. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019; 257: 261-265.
Schoville R, Titler MG. Integrated technology implementation model: Examination and enhancements. Computers, Informatics, Nurs-ing. 2020; 38(11): 579-589. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000632
Shachak A, Kuziemsky C, Petersen C. Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019; 100; 103315. doi: 10.1016/j. jbi.2019.103315
Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A sys-tematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2018; 9(3): 604-634. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668091
Griffin JM, Hellmich TR, Pasupathy KS, Funni SA, Pagel SM, Srinivasan SS, et al. Attitudes and behavior of health care work-ers before, during, and after implementation of real-time location system technology. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020; 4(1): 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.10.007
Houngbo PT, Coleman HL, Zweekhorst M, De Cock Bun-ing T, Medenou D, Bunders JF. A model for good governance of health care technology management in the public sector: Learning from evidence-informed policy development and implementation in benin. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1): e0168842. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0168842
Soril LJ, MacKean G, Noseworthy TW, Leggett LE, Clem-ent FM. Achieving optimal technology use: A proposed model for health technology reassessment. SAGE Open Med. 2017; 5: Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 18 Hilty DM et al 2050312117704861. doi: 10.1177/2050312117704861
Winter A, Stäubert S, Ammon D, Aiche S, Beyan O, Bischoff V, et al. Smart Medical Information Technology for Health care (SMITH) *- Data Integration based on Interoperability Standards. Methods Inf Med. 2018; 57(S 01): e92-e105. doi: 10.3414/ME18- 02-0004
Hilty DM, Uno J, Chan S, Torous J, Boland RJ. Role of tech-nology in faculty development in psychiatry. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2019; 42: 493-512. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2019.05.013
Hilty DM, Armstrong CM, Luxton DD, Gentry M, Krupinski E. Sensor, wearable and remote patient monitoring competencies for clinical care and training: Scoping review. J Tech Behav Sci. 2021; 1-26. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00190-3 Systematic Review | Volume 7 | Number 1 |
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
