Examining the Rise of Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19: A Call to Action for Psychologists as Social Advocates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-9-169Keywords:
COVID-19, COVID-19 pandemic, Intimate partner violence (IPV), Psychologist advocacyAbstract
The circumstances of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting confinement of persons culminated
in political unrest, demonstrations for social justice, and increases in crime, including intimate partner violence. The pandemic
gave intimate partner abusers free reign to monitor the activities, movements, and communications of domestic abuse survivors,
restricting access to planning and implementing an escape route. This resulted in the need for psychologists to provide psychological
services, some of which were restricted by the limitations of the pandemic. With psychologists providing this assistance,
it appears clear that they are in a unique position to inform policy, political decisions, and social justice based on their training,
clinical practice, and expertise in human behavior and human suffering. This paper addresses the need for psychologists as social
advocates, arguing that they occupy a vital position in both treatment and research that enables them to represent those affected
by intimate partner violence (IPV), as well as inform legislation on this issue.
References
American Psychological Association (APA). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2017. Website. https:// www.apa.org/ethics/code/. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of hu-man development. American Psychologist. 1977; 32(7): 513-531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
Kozan S, Blustein DL. Implementing social change: A quali-tative analysis of counseling psychologists’ engagement in ad-vocacy. The Counseling Psychologist. 2018; 46(2): 154-189. doi: 10.1177/0011000018756882
Ali A, Lees KE. The therapist as advocate: Anti-oppression ad-vocacy in psychological practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013; 69(2): 162-171. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21955
Hoagwood KE, Purtle J, Spandorfer J, Peth-Pierce R, Horwitz SM. Aligning dissemination and implementation science with health policies to improve children’s mental health. The American Psychologist. 2020; 75(8): 1130-1145. doi: 10.1037/amp0000706
Sommers-Flanagan J, Sommers-Flanagan R. Clinical Interviewing. 6th ed. NY, US: Wiley Publishers; 2017.
Kinderman P. The role of the psychologist in social change. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2014; 60(4): 403-405. doi: 10.1177/0020764013491741
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevent-ing intimate partner violence. Violence Prevention. 2020. Website. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnervio-lence/fastfact.html. Retrieved September 25, 2021. Accessed Sep-tember 16, 2023.
Mitchell C, Anglin D, Nicolaidis C, Paranjape A. Defining in-timate partner violence: Controversies and implications. In: Inti-mate Partner Violence: A Health-based Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV). Domestic violence. ncadv.org. 2020. Website. https://assets.speak-cdn.com/assets/2497/domestic_violence-2020080709350855. pdf ?1596811079991. Retrieved September 25, 2021. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Dyar C, Messinger AM, Newcomb ME, Byck GR, Dunlap P, 13 Balice G, et al Whitton SW. Development and initial validation of three cultural-ly sensitive measures of intimate partner violence for sexual and gender minority populations. J Interpers Violence. 2021 36(15-16): NP8824-NP8851. doi: 10.1177/0886260519846856
Deo KM. The likelihood of reporting intimate partner vio-lence: A comparison between same-sex couples and heterosexual couples. Michigan, USA: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2014.
Williamson J, Serna K. Reconsidering forced labels: Out-comes of sexual assault survivors versus victims (and those who choose neither). Violence Against Women. 2018; 24(6): 668-683. doi: 10.1177/1077801217711268
Liang B, Goodman L, Tummala-Narra P, Weintraub S. A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. Am J Community Psy-chol. 2005; 36(1): 71-84. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
Papendick M, Bohner G. “Passive victim - strong survivor”? Perceived meaning of labels applied to women who were raped. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177550-e0177550. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0177550
Gagné P, Renfro-Sargent M. Introduction: Social movements in the new century. Sociological Focus. 2004; 37(3); 187-193. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2004.10571241
Women Against Abuse. The Language We Use. 2022. Website. https://www.womenagainstabuse.org/education-resources/the-language-we-use. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Burns SC, Kogan CS, Heyman RE, et al. Evaluating the re-lationship between intimate partner violence-related training and mental health professionals’ assessment of relationship prob-lems. J Interpers Violence. 2022; 37(15-16): NP14262-NP14288. doi: 10.1177/08862605211005154
Bridges AJ, Karlsson M, Lindly E. The effect of brief, passive psychoeducation on knowledge and ratings of intimate partner vi-olence in the United States and Argentina. J Interpers Violence. 2015; 30(2): 272-294. doi: 10.1177/0886260514534775
Todahl J, Walters E. Universal screening for intimate partner violence: A systematic review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011; 37(3): 355- 369. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00179.x
Hameed M, O’Doherty L, Gilchrist G, et al. Psychological thera-pies for women who experience intimate partner violence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 7(7): CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD013017.pub2
Iverson KM, Gradus JL, Resick PA, Suvak MK, Smith KF, Monson CM. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for PTSD and depres-sion symptoms reduces risk for future intimate partner violence among interpersonal trauma survivors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; Review | Volume 9 | Number 1 | 79(2): 193-202. doi: 10.1037/a0022512
Birkley EL, Eckhardt CI, Dykstra RE. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, intimate partner violence, and relationship functioning: A meta-analytic review: PTSD, IPV, and relationship functioning. J Trauma Stress. 2016; 29(5): 397-405. doi: 10.1002/ jts.22129
Perez S, Johnson DM, Wright CV. The attenuating effect of empowerment on IPV-related PTSD symptoms in battered wom-en living in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women. 2012; 18(1): 102-117. doi: 10.1177/1077801212437348
Merino GA, Mueller J, O’Brien-Milne L, Ghaus K, Duvvury N, Scriver S. The social costs of violence against women and girls on survivors, their families and communities in Pakistan. Paki-stan Journal of Women’s Studies. 2020; 26(1): 1-20. doi: 10.46521/ pjws.026.01.0013
Murray KW, Bair-Merritt MH, Roche K, Cheng TL. The im-pact of intimate partner violence on mothers’ parenting practices for urban, low-income adolescents. Journal of Family Violence. 2012; 27(6): 573-583. doi: 10.1007/s10896-012-9449-x
Bradbury-Jones C, Isham L. The pandemic paradox: The con-sequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29(13-14): 2047-2049. doi: 10. 1111/jocn.15296
Grych J, Swan S. Toward a more comprehensive understand-ing of interpersonal violence: Introduction to the special issue on interconnections among different types of violence. Psychology of Violence. 2012; 2(2): 105-110. doi: 10.1037/a0027616
Manring T. Minding the gap in domestic violence legislation: Should states adopt course of conduct laws? The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 2021; 111(3): 773-803.
LeBlanc AN, Mong MD. The double standard of accountabili-ty: A call for treatment integrity of IPV offender programs. Partner Abuse. 2021; 12(1): 94-108. doi: 10.1891/PA-D-20-00005
Babcock, J, Armenti, N, Cannon, C, et al. Domestic violence perpetrator programs: A proposal for evidence-based stand-ards in the United States. Partner Abuse. 2016; 7(4): 355-460. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.7.4.355
Corvo K, Spitzmueller M. Domestic violence policy, forensic mental health, and the revival of rehabilitation: Crossroads or cross purposes. Partner Abuse. 2017; 8(3): 315-328. doi: 10.1891/1946- 6560.8.3.315
Cannon C, Corvo K, Buttell F, Hamel J. Barriers to advancing evidence-based practice in domestic violence perpetrator treat-ment in the United States: Ideology, public funding, or both? Part-ner Abuse. 2021; 12(2): 221-237. doi: 10.1891/PA-2020-0008 Review | Volume 9 | Number 1 | Balice G, et al
Yaxley R, Norris K, Haines J. Psychological assessment of in-timate partner violence. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law. 2018; 25(2): 237-256. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1356211
Alzueta E, Perrin P, Baker FC, et al. How the COVID‐19 pandemic has changed our lives: A study of psychological corre-lates across 59 countries. J Clin Psychol. 2021; 77(3): 556-570. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23082
Jetelina KK, Knell G, Molsberry RJ. Changes in intimate part-ner violence during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Injury Prevention. 2021; 27(1); 93-97. doi: 10.1136/inju-ryprev-2020-043831
Gosangi B, Park H, Thomas R, et al. Exacerbation of physical intimate partner violence during COVID-19 pandemic. Radiology. 2021; 298(1): E38-E45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202866
Lagdon S, Armour C, Stringer M. Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisa-tion: A systematic review. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014; 5(1): 24794- 24812. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.24794
Burnette CE, Cannon C. “It will always continue unless we can change something”: Consequences of intimate partner violence for indigenous women, children, and families. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014; 5(1): 24585-24588. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.24585
Dichter ME, Cerulli C, Bossarte RM. Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans and associated heart health risks. Women’s Health Issues. 2011; 21(4): S190-S194. doi: 10.1016/j. whi.2011.04.008
Moreira DN, Pinto da Costa M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the precipitation of intimate partner violence. Inter-national Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2020; 71: 101606-101606. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101606
Jones DS. COVID-19, history, and humility. Centaurus. 2020; 62(2): 370-380. doi: 10.1111/1600-0498.12296
Kofman YB, Garfin DR. Home is not always a haven: The domestic violence crisis amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Trauma. 2020; 12(S1): S199-S201. doi: 10.1037/tra0000866
Taub A. A new COVID-19 crisis: Domestic abuse rises world-wide. The New York Times. 2020. Website. https://www.nytimes. com/2020/04/06/world/coronavirus-domestic-violence.html. Retrieved April 20, 2020. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Lipp NS, Johnson NL. The impact of COVID-19 on domestic violence agency functioning: A case study. J Soc Issues. 2023; 79(2): 735-746. doi: 10.1111/josi.12549
Peitzmeier SM, Fedina L, Ashwell L, Herrenkohl TI, Tolman R. Increases in intimate partner violence during COVID-19: Preva-lence and correlates. J Interpers Violence. 2022; 37(21-22): NP20482- NP20512. doi: 10.1177/08862605211052586
Ragavan MI, Risser L, Duplessis V, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the needs and lived experiences of in-timate partner violence survivors in the United States: Advocate perspectives. Violence Against Women. 2022; 28(12-13): 3114-31341. doi: 10.1177/10778012211054869
Buttell F, Ferreira RJ. The hidden disaster of COVID-19: In-timate partner violence. Psychol Trauma. 2020; 12(S1): S197-S198. doi: 10.1037/tra0000646
Davis M, Gilbar O, Padilla-Medina DM. Intimate partner vio-lence victimization and perpetration among U.S. adults during the earliest stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Violence and Victims. 2021; 36(5): 583-603. doi: 10.1891/VV-D-21-00005
Shachar C, Engel J, Elwyn G. Implications for telehealth in a post-pandemic future: Regulatory and privacy issues. JAMA. 2020; 323(23): 2375-2376. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7943
Chiauzzi E, Clayton A, Huh-Yoo J. Videoconferencing-based telemental health: Important questions for the COVID-19 era from clinical and patient-centered perspectives. JMIR Mental Health. 2020; 7(12): e24021 doi: 10.2196/24021
Ghidei W, Montesanti S, Tomkow K, Silverstone PH, Wells L, Campbell S. Examining the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of virtually delivered trauma-focused domestic vio-lence and sexual violence interventions: A rapid evidence as-sessment. Trauma, Violence, Abuse. 2023; 24(3): 1427-1442. doi: 10.1177/15248380211069059
Signal for help. (n.d.). Canadian Women’s Foundation. Website. https://canadianwomen.org/signal-for-help/. Retrieved April 2, 2022. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Slakoff DC, Aujla W, PenzeyMoog E. The role of service providers, technology, and mass media when home isn’t safe for intimate partner violence victims: Best practices and recommen-dations in the era of COVID-19 and beyond. Archives of Sexual Be-havior. 2020; 49(8): 2779-2788. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01820-w
Sullivan CM, Goodman LA. Advocacy with survivors of inti-mate partner violence: What it is, what it isn’t, and why it’s critically important. Violence Against Women. 2019; 25(16): 2007-2023. doi: 10.1177/1077801219875826
Rivas, C, Ramsay, J, Sadowski, L, et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psy-chosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 3(12): CD005043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub3
Messing JT, Ward-Lasher A, Thaller J, Bagwell-Gray ME. The 15 Balice G, et al state of intimate partner violence intervention: Progress and con-tinuing challenges. Social Work. 2015; 60(4): 305-313. doi: 10.1093/ sw/swv027
Moore AM, Gover AR. Violence against women: reflect-ing on 25 years of the violence against women act and direc-tions for the future. Violence Against Women. 2021; 27(1): 3-7. doi: 10.1177/1077801220949693
Morgan RE, Oudekerk BA. Criminal victimization, 2018. U.S. Department of Justice. 2019. Website. https://www.bjs.gov/con-tent/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Goodmark L. Reimagining VAWA: Why criminaliza-tion is a failed policy and what a non-carceral VAWA could look like. Violence Against Women. 2021; 27(1): 84-101. doi: 10.1177/1077801220949686
Avent E, Wilber K, Gassoumis Z. Predictors of late-life phys-ical IPV using Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Innov Aging. 2018; 2: 470-471. doi: 10.1093/ geroni/igy023.1759
Sabri B, Hartley M, Saha J, Murray S, Glass N, Campbell JC. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on women’s health and safety: A study of immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International. 2020; 41(11-12): 1294-1312. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1833012
CONGRESS.GOV. H.R.3083 - Battered Immigrant Wom-en Protection Act of 1999. 106th Congress (1999-2000). 1999. Website. https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3083?s=1&r=2. Accessed September 16, 2023.
Bair-Merritt, M. H, Jennings, J. M, Chen, R, et al. Reducing maternal intimate partner violence after the birth of a child: A randomized controlled trial of the hawaii healthy start home visi-tation program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020; 164(1): 16-23. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.237
Duggan A, Fuddy L, McFarlane E, et al. Evaluating a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse in at-risk families of newborns: Fathers’ participation and outcomes. Child Maltreatment. 2004; 9(1): 3-17. doi: 10.1177/1077559503261336
Flood M, Howson R, Aavik K, Hamilton A. Engaging Men in Building Gender Equality. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2015.
Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Ennett ST, Linder GF, Benefield T, Suchindran C. Assessing the long-term effects of the safe dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. American Journal of Public Health. 2004; 94(4): 619-624. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.4.619
Miller LE, Howell KH, Graham-Bermann SA. Potential me-Review | Volume 9 | Number 1 | diators of adjustment for preschool children exposed to intimate partner violence. Child Abuse Negl. 2012; 36(9): 671-675. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.07.005
Wolfe DA, Wekerle C, Scott K, Straatman A-L, Grasley C, Reitzel-Jaffe D. Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: A controlled outcome evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71(2): Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 9 | Number 1 | Balice G, et al 279-291. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.2.279
Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, et al. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: A cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163(8): 692-699. doi: 10.1001/arch-pediatrics.2009.69
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
