Optimizing windrow method vermicomposting practices for enhancing income generating of formers in Mahrajganj District of Uttar Pradesh: “ A Research Perspective.”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.466Keywords:
Bio-oxidation, Eisenia Foetida, Front Line Demonstration, Mesophilic microorganism, capacity building, VermicompostAbstract
Vermicomposting is an ecofriendly biological process involving the joint action of earthworms and mesophilic microorganism for the bio-oxidation and stabilization of organic wastes into nutrient rich vertices. The process effectively converts agricultural residues and cattle dung into high quality organic fertilizer while reducing waste volume by 40-60 per cent. Vermicompost is widely recognized as a valuable bio-fertilizer due to its balanced nutrient composition, rich microbial population and positive effects on soil physical, chemical and biological properties.
The present study was conducted into two villages, namely Nandana and Pakadiyar Bishunpur of Maharajganj district, Uttar Pradesh, with the objective of optimizing windrow method vermicomposting practices for income generation among farmers. Thirty farmers were initially trained on various aspects of Vermicompost production, out of which eight interested farmers were selected for practical Vermicompost production under front line demonstration (FLD), socio- economic data of the respondents were collected prior to the intervention. Training on windrow method vermicomposting technology was imparted and farmer’s knowledge levels were assessed before and after the training programme.
Under FLD, windrows of size 12 X 4 X 2 feet were prepared and 56 kg of Eisenia foetida earthworms were provided to each beneficiary. Result revealed that farmers had a low level of knowledge regarding vermicomposting practices before training, which increased significantly to nearly 98 % after training. The average production of Vermicompost and earthworms per six months (two cycles) was recorded as 2.27 tones and 20 kg, respectively. The activity generated an average gross income of Rs. 28,750.00 with a benefit- cost ratio of 7.32, indicating high profitability. The study clearly demonstrates that optimizing windrow method vermicomposting supported by capacity building and technical guidance can generating enterprises for small and marginal farmers.
References
Edwards, C. A., & Arancon, N. Q. The science of ver-miculture: An introduction to earthworm farming and sustainable waste management. CRC Press; 2004.
Ndegwa, P. M., & Thompson, S. A. Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treat-ment and bioconversion of biosolids. Biore-source Technology. 2001;76(2):107–112.
Domínguez, J., Aira, M., & Gómez-Brandón, M. Vermicomposting: Earthworms enhance the work of microbes. In: Gómez-Brandón M, Domínguez Touza JM, editors. Vermiculture Tech-nology: Earthworms, Organic Wastes, and Envi-ronmental Management. CRC Press; 2010. p. 57– 84.
Garg, V. K., Kaushik, P., & Yadav, R. Vermicom-posting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: A comparative study. Bioresource Tech-nology. 2006;97(3):391–395.
Ravindran, B., Bhattacharyya, A., & Sujatha, D. Vermicomposting technology and its agricultural benefits: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(20):19751–19767.
Gómez-Brandón, M., Lores, M., Insam, H., & Domínguez, J. Strategies for recycling and val-orization of digestate from biogas plants based on vermicomposting. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2012;19(6):2015–2025.
Atiyeh, R. M., Dominguez, J., Subler, S., & Ed-wards, C. A. Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia. 2000;44(6):709– 724.
Gajalakshmi, S., & Abbasi, S. A. Solid waste man-agement by vermicomposting: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2008;37(5):791– 801.
Aalok, A., Tripathi, A. K., & Soni, P. Vermicom-posting: A better option for organic solid waste management. J Human Ecol. 2008;24(1):59–64.
Sarangi, B. K., Singh, D. P., & Mohanty, S. Com-Table 6. Production of Vermicompost and Earthworm in Windrow Method (per unit / six months) almost two cycles Production/Unit/ No. of Cost of Year six months Loca- Input/Unit Earth-tions (Rs.) worm (Ton.) (kg) (June– 04 2.20 20 5800 Dec) (Jan– 04 2.35 20 3000 June) Sale rate of earthworm: Rs. 300/kg & (Second cycle done at same location/place) parative efficiency of Eisenia fetida and Perionyx excavatus in vermicomposting of rice straw and cow dung mixture. J Environ Biol. 2017;38(5):931– 937.
Yadav, A., Garg, V. K., & Yadav, S. Vermicompost-ing: An eco-friendly approach for utilization of organic waste. J Environ Manag. 2018;219:189– 203.
Bhat, S. A., Singh, J., Vig, A. P., & Kumar, R. Ver-micomposting of vegetable market waste using Eisenia fetida: Impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and decomposition rate. J Environ Biol. 2011;32(5):641–646.
Singh, J., Bhat, S. A., Vig, A. P., & Sharma, S. Vermicomposting of fruit waste and veg-etable waste using Eisenia fetida. J Environ Biol. 2013;34(5):829–834.
Singh, J., Kalamdhad, A. S., & Kazmi, A. A. Ver-micomposting: A sustainable option for organic solid waste management. Waste Management and Research. 2018;36(6):475–489.
By integrating these techniques and consider-ing the referenced studies, practitioners can im-plement efficient vermicomposting systems for organic waste management and sustainable agri-culture; 2022.
Rao, A. G., Singh, D. P., & Yadav, A. K. Optimiz-ing vermicomposting methods involves improv-ing efficiency, maximizing nutrient retention and minimizing environmental impacts — A review. 2024;45(10):50–56.
Suthar, S., Pandey, B., Gusain, R., Gaur, R. Z., & Kumar, K. Nutrient changes and biodynamics of Eisenia fetida during vermicomposting of water lettuce (Pistia sp.) biomass: a noxious weed of aquatic system. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2017;24:199– 207.
Alshehrei, F., & Ameen, F. Vermicomposting: A management tool to mitigate solid waste. Saudi Gross Return (Rs.) Net B:C Return Ratio Vermi- Earth- (Rs.) Total compost worm 22000 6000 28000 22200 4.82 23500 6000 29500 26500 9.83 Sale rate of Vermicompost: Rs. 10/kg Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28(6):3284– 3293.
Tiwari, S., & Pathak, P. Vermicomposting: Role of earthworms in sustainable waste management. In: Microorganisms in Environmental Manage-ment: Microbes and Environment. Springer; 2018. p. 259–273.
Vuković, A., Velki, M., Ečimović, S., Vuković, R., Štolfa Čamagajevac, I., & Lončarić, Z. Vermicom-posting — facts, benefits and knowledge gaps. Agronomy. 2021;11(10):1952.
Keerthana, D., Kumar, P., & Mehera, B. Effect of Vermicompost and Molybdenum on Growth and Yield of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology. 2024;27(5):948–953.
Lal, A., M.S., S., B., R., N., C., & B., A. Advanced ver-micomposting modality: Microbial acceleration to improve micronutrient profile of agricultural residue derived compost. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2024;36(9):556–563.
Nahar, K., Haque, M. A., Ali, M. K. J., & Jannat, S. A. Effects of Vermicompost and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Sesame. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research. 2023;23(4):26– 32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Public Health - Open Journal (PHOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
