Endophytic Microbial Inoculation Modulates Plant Defense Responses and Growth Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.2026.v11.i01.pp610-622.2652Keywords:
endophytes, plant immunity, defence priming, induced systemic resistance, phytohormonal crosstalk, plant growth promotion, synthetic microbial communities, multi-omics, microbial inoculants 610Abstract
Endophytic microorganisms inhabit internal plant tissues without causing visible disease and can substan-
tially modify plant growth, immunity, nutrient acquisition and tolerance to environmental stress. Their
effects arise from coordinated interactions among microbial colonization traits, plant immune surveillance,
phytohormonal signalling, redox regulation, nutrient exchange and resident microbial communities. Endo-
phytes are not immunologically invisible; rather, successful strains regulate the amplitude, duration and
spatial distribution of pattern-triggered immunity. Controlled immune accommodation permits internal
colonization, whereas reactive oxygen species, mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and specialized
metabolites constrain excessive microbial proliferation. Many endophytes simultaneously prime systemic
tissues through jasmonic acid, ethylene, salicylic acid and N-hydroxypipecolic acid-associated pathways,
enabling faster defence activation after pathogen challenge without the metabolic cost of constitutive
resistance. Growth promotion results from microbial auxin production, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate
deaminase activity, biological nitrogen fixation, phosphorus transfer, siderophore production, improved
root architecture and maintenance of photosynthesis under stress. Representative systems include Bacillus
velezensis FZB42, Enterobacter sp. SA187, Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, Colletotrichum tofieldiae,
Serendipita indica and endophytic Beauveria, Metarhizium and Epichloë species. Synthetic communities
and bacterial–fungal combinations can broaden disease suppression and environmental stability, although
strain identity and functional compatibility are often more important than taxonomic richness. Multi-omics,
spatial imaging, stable-isotope tracing and synthetic biology are improving mechanistic resolution, while
encapsulation and hydrogel technologies are enhancing inoculant delivery. However, field performance
remains constrained by host genotype, resident microbiota, formulation, environmental variability and
biosafety concerns. This review integrates current understanding of endophyte diversity, colonization,
immune modulation, growth promotion, stress adaptation and field translation, emphasizing the need for
mechanism-guided, ecology-aware and genomically validated inoculant development.
References
Bulgarelli, D., Rott, M., Schlaeppi, K., van The-maat, E. V. L., Ahmadinejad, N., Assenza, F., Rauf, P., Huettel, B., Reinhardt, R., Schmelzer, E., Peplies, J., Gloeckner, F. O., Amann, R., Eick-horst, T., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2012). Reveal-ing structure and assembly cues for Arabidop-sis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature, 488(7409), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature11336
Lundberg, D. S., Lebeis, S. L., Paredes, S. H., Your-stone, S., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., del Rio, T. G., Edgar, R. C., Eickhorst, T., Ley, R. E., Hugenholtz, P., Tringe, S. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2012). Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Na-ture, 488(7409), 86–90. https://doi.org/10 .1038/nature11237
Schlaeppi, K., Dombrowski, N., Garrido-Oter, R., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2014). Quantitative divergence of the bacterial root mi-crobiota in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. Pro-ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 585–592. ht tps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321597111
Bulgarelli, D., Garrido-Oter, R., Münch, P. C., Weiman, A., Dröge, J., Pan, Y., McHardy, A. C., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2015). Structure and func-tion of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host & Microbe, 17(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom .2015.01.011
Edwards, J., Johnson, C., Santos-Medellín, C., Lurie, E., Podishetty, N. K., Bhatnagar, S., Eisen, J. A., & Sundaresan, V. (2015). Structure, vari-ation, and assembly of the root-associated mi-crobiomes of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer-ica, 112(8), E911–E920. https://doi.org/10 .1073/pnas.1414592112
Fitzpatrick, C. R., Copeland, J., Wang, P. W., Guttman, D. S., Kotanen, P. M., & Johnson, M. T. J. (2018). Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(6), E1157–E1165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pn as.1717617115
Walters, W. A., Jin, Z., Youngblut, N., Wallace, J. G., Sutter, J., Zhang, W., González-Peña, A., Peif-fer, J., Koren, O., Shi, Q., Knight, R., del Rio, T. G., Tringe, S. G., Buckler, E. S., Dangl, J. L., & Ley, R. E. (2018). Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(28), 7368– 7373. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.180
Bai, Y., Müller, D. B., Srinivas, G., Garrido-Oter, R., Potthoff, E., Rott, M., Dombrowski, N., Münch, P. C., Spaepen, S., Remus-Emsermann, M., Hüttel, B., McHardy, A. C., Vorholt, J. A., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2015). Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature, 528(7582), 364– 369. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1619
Garrido-Oter, R., Nakano, R. T., Dombrowski, N., Ma, K. W., McHardy, A. C., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2018). Modular traits of the Rhizobiales root mi-crobiota and their evolutionary relationship with symbiotic rhizobia. Cell Host & Microbe, 24(1), 155–167.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ch om.2018.06.006
Levy, A., Salas Gonzalez, I., Mittelviefhaus, M., Clingenpeel, S., Herrera Paredes, S., Miao, J., Wang, K., Devescovi, G., Stillman, K., Monteiro, F., Rangel Alvarez, B., Lundberg, D. S., Lu, T. Y., Lebeis, S., Jin, Z., McDonald, M., Klein, A. P., Feltcher, M. E., Rio, T. G., ... Dangl, J. L. (2018). Ge-nomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nature Genetics, 50(1), 138–150. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41588-017-0012-9
Wippel, K., Tao, K., Niu, Y., Zgadzaj, R., Guan, R., Dahms, E., Zhang, P., Jensen, D. B., Logemann, E., Radutoiu, S., Schulze-Lefert, P., & Garrido-Oter, R. (2021). Host preference and invasiveness of commensal bacteria in the Lotus and Arabidop-sis root microbiota. Nature Microbiology, 6(9), 1150–1162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s415 64-021-00941-9
Debnath, A., Sarkar, A., Pongen, M., & Devi, H. L. (2021). Advances in micropropagation and in vitro techniques for rapid multiplication of horti-cultural plants. Plant Science Archives, 6(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.51470/PSA.2021.6.4.
Mesny, F., Miyauchi, S., Thiergart, T., Pickel, B., Atanasova, L., Karlsson, M., Hüttel, B., Barry, K. W., Haridas, S., Chen, C., ... Hacquard, S. (2021). Genetic determinants of endophytism in the Ara-bidopsis root mycobiome. Nature Communica-tions, 12, 7227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s4 1467-021-27479-y
Ujimatsu, R., Takino, J., Aoki, S., Nakamura, M., Haba, H., Minami, A., & Hiruma, K. (2025). A fun-gal transcription factor converts a beneficial root endophyte into an anthracnose leaf pathogen. Current Biology, 35(9), 1989–2005.e6. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.026
Hurek, T., Handley, L. L., Reinhold-Hurek, B., & Piché, Y. (2002). Azoarcus grass endophytes con-tribute fixed nitrogen to the plant in an uncultur-able state. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 15(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1094/ MPMI.2002.15.3.233
Compant, S., Reiter, B., Sessitsch, A., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Ait Barka, E. (2005). Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(4), 1685–1693. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.71.4.1685-1693.2005
Debnath, A., Sarkar, A., Pongen, M., & Devi, H. L. (2022). Recent advances in fruit production systems and innovative technologies for yield improvement. Journal of Food and Biotechnol-ogy, 3(2), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.51470/F AB.2022.3.2.05
Witzel, K., Üstün, S., Schreiner, M., Grosch, R., Börnke, F., & Ruppel, S. (2017). A proteomic ap-proach suggests unbalanced proteasome func-tioning induced by the growth-promoting bac-terium Kosakonia radicincitans in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 661. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00661
Tzipilevich, E., Russ, D., Dangl, J. L., & Benfey, P. N. (2021). Plant immune system activation is necessary for efficient root colonization by auxin-secreting beneficial bacteria. Cell Host & Microbe, 29(10), 1507–1520.e4. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.chom.2021.09.005
Vannier, N., Mesny, F., Getzke, F., Chesneau, G., Dethier, L., Ordon, J., Thiergart, T., & Hac-quard, S. (2023). Genome-resolved metatran-scriptomics reveals conserved root colonization determinants in a synthetic microbiota. Nature Communications, 14, 8274. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-023-43688-z
Macho, A. P., & Zipfel, C. (2014). Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Molec-ular Cell, 54(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.molcel.2014.03.028
Couto, D., & Zipfel, C. (2016). Regulation of pat-tern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Na-ture Reviews Immunology, 16(9), 537–552. http s://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.77
Bjornson, M., Pimprikar, P., Nürnberger, T., & Zipfel, C. (2021). The transcriptional landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana pattern-triggered immu-nity. Nature Plants, 7(5), 579–586. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41477-021-00874-5
Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Colaianni, N. R., Fitzpatrick, C. R., & Dangl, J. L. (2021). Beyond pathogens: Microbiota interactions with the plant immune system. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 62, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2021.04.
Ma, K. W., Niu, Y., Jia, Y., Ordon, J., Copeland, C., Emonet, A., Geldner, N., Guan, R., Stolze, S. C., Nakagami, H., Garrido-Oter, R., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2021). Coordination of microbe–host homeostasis by crosstalk with plant innate im-munity. Nature Plants, 7(6), 814–825. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00920-2
Emonet, A., Zhou, F., Vacheron, J., Heiman, C. M., Dénervaud Tendon, V., Ma, K.-W., Schulze-Lefert, P., Keel, C., & Geldner, N. (2021). Spatially restricted immune responses are required for maintaining root meristematic activity upon de-tection of bacteria. Current Biology, 31(5), 1012– 1028.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub. 2020.12.048
Entila, F., Zhang, W., Kim, J., Huang, A. C., & Melotto, M. (2024). Plant-derived reactive oxygen species tame a potentially harmful leaf commen-sal bacterium. Nature Communications, 15, 566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-4 4724-2
Pieterse, C. M. J., van Wees, S. C. M., Hoffland, E., van Pelt, J. A., & van Loon, L. C. (1996). Sys-temic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by bio-control bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene ex-pression. The Plant Cell, 8(8), 1225–1237. https: //doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.8.1225
Pieterse, C. M. J., van Wees, S. C. M., van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., Weisbeek, P. J., & van Loon, L. C. (1998). A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 10(9), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571
Van Wees, S. C. M., de Swart, E. A. M., van Pelt, J. A., van Loon, L. C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2000). Enhancement of induced disease resis-tance by simultaneous activation of salicylate-and jasmonate-dependent defence pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer-ica, 97(15), 8711–8716. https://doi.org/10 .1073/pnas.130425197
Verhagen, B. W. M., Glazebrook, J., Zhu, T., Chang, H. S., van Loon, L. C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2004). The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced sys-temic resistance in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 17(8), 895–908. https: //doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.8.895
Xu, P., Fundneider, S., Lange, B., Maksym, R., Stuttmann, J., & Schäffner, A. R. (2025). A root-based N-hydroxypipecolic acid standby circuit to direct immunity and growth of Arabidopsis shoots. Nature Plants, 11(8), 1658–1669. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41477-025-02053-2
Glick, B. R., Cheng, Z., Czarny, J., & Duan, J. (2007). Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 119(3), 329–339. ht tps://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-916 2-4
Ali, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R. (2014). Ame-lioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 80, 160–167. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003
Debnath, A., Mohanty, A. K., Devi, P. B., Birendra-jit, C., Debnath, B. C., Devi, Y. P., Singh, P., Das, R., Suklabaidya, A., & Irenaeus, T. K. S. (2026). Tech-nology assessment and development of com-mercial marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cultivation: Insights from adoption and gap analysis in North-east India. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development, 9(5), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2026 .v9.i5e.3601
de Zélicourt, A., Synek, L., Saad, M. M., Alzubaidy, H., Jalal, R., Xie, Y., Andrés-Barrao, C., Rolli, E., Guerard, F., Mariappan, K. G., Daur, I., Colcombet, J., Benhamed, M., Depaepe, T., Van Der Straeten, D., & Hirt, H. (2018). Ethylene-induced plant stress tolerance by Enterobacter sp. SA187 is me-diated by 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid pro-duction. PLoS Genetics, 14(3), e1007273. https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007273
Andrés-Barrao, C., Alzubaidy, H., Jalal, R., Mari-appan, K. G., de Zélicourt, A., Bokhari, A., Artyukh, O., Alwutayd, K., Rawat, A., Shekhawat, K., Almeida-Trapp, M., Saad, M. M., & Hirt, H. (2021). Coordinated bacterial and plant sulfur metabolism in Enterobacter sp. SA187-induced plant salt stress tolerance. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(46), e2107417118. https://do i.org/10.1073/pnas.2107417118
Castrillo, G., Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Paredes, S. H., Law, T. F., de Lorenzo, L., Feltcher, M. E., Finkel, O. M., Breakfield, N. W., Mieczkowski, P., Jones, C. D., Paz-Ares, J., & Dangl, J. L. (2017). Root mi-crobiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature, 543(7646), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21417
Huang, A. C., Jiang, T., Liu, Y. X., Bai, Y. C., Reed, J., Qu, B., Goossens, A., Nützmann, H. W., Bai, Y., & Osbourn, A. (2019). A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science, 364(6440), eaau6389. http s://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6389
Koprivova, A., Schuck, S., Jacoby, R. P., Klinkham-mer, I., Welter, B., Leson, L., Martyn, A., Nauen, J., Grabenhorst, N., Mandelkow, J. F., Zuccaro, A., Zeier, J., & Kopriva, S. (2019). Root-specific ca-malexin biosynthesis controls the plant growth-promoting effects of multiple bacterial strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(31), 15735– 15744. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181
Voges, M. J. E. E. E., Bai, Y., Schulze-Lefert, P., & Sattely, E. S. (2019). Plant-derived coumarins shape the composition of an Arabidopsis syn-thetic root microbiome. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(25), 12558–12565. https://do i.org/10.1073/pnas.1820691116
Harbort, C. J., Hashimoto, M., Inoue, H., Niu, Y., Guan, R., Rombolà, A. D., Kopriva, S., Voges, M. J. E. E. E., Sattely, E. S., Garrido-Oter, R., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2020). Root-secreted coumarins and the microbiota interact to improve iron nutrition in Arabidopsis. Cell Host & Microbe, 28(6), 825– 837.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom .2020.09.006
Debnath, A., Alie, B. A., Birendrajit C., & Imtilemla. (2026). Microbiome-assisted crop production im-proves nutrient cycling and reduces fertilizer de-pendency. Public Health – Open Journal, 11(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.17140/PHOJ.11 .01.53
Deepa, N., Chauhan, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Un-ravelling the functional characteristics of endo-phytic bacterial diversity for plant growth pro-motion and enhanced secondary metabolite pro-duction in Pelargonium graveolens. Microbiolog-ical Research, 283, 127673. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127673
Nunna, S. A. D., & Balachandar, D. (2024). Genotype-specificity in putative competitive en-dophytes modulated by root exudation of rice. Rhizosphere, 31, 100940. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.rhisph.2024.100940
Taheri, P., Dastogeer, K. M. G., Ratu, S. T. N., Agyekum, D. V. A., Yasuda, M., Fujii, Y., & Okazaki, S. (2024). Diversity and plant growth-promotion potential of endophytic fungi isolated from hairy vetch in Japan. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1476200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls .2024.1476200
Ryan, R. P., Germaine, K., Franks, A., Ryan, D. J., & Dowling, D. N. (2008). Bacterial endophytes: Recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 278(1), 1–9. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x
Compant, S., Kaplan, H., Sessitsch, A., Nowak, J., Ait Barka, E., & Clément, C. (2008). Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(20), 6410–6420. https://doi.org/10.112 8/AEM.01105-08
Ait Barka, E., Nowak, J., & Clément, C. (2006). Enhancement of chilling resistance of in-oculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholde-ria phytofirmans strain PsJN. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(11), 7246–7252. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01047-06
Yang, A., Akhtar, S. S., Fu, Q., Naveed, M., Iqbal, S., Roitsch, T., & Jacobsen, S.-E. (2020). Burkholde-ria phytofirmans PsJN stimulates growth and yield of quinoa under salinity stress. Plants, 9(6), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060
King, E., Wallner, A., Guigard, L., Rimbault, I., Parrinello, H., Klonowska, A., Moulin, L., & Czer-nic, P. (2023). Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN colonization of rice endosphere triggers an atypical transcriptomic response compared with rice-native Burkholderia sensu lato endo-phytes. Scientific Reports, 13, 10696. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37314-7
Pérez-Alonso, M.-M., Guerrero-Galán, C., González Ortega-Villaizán, A., Ortiz-García, P., Scholz, S. S., Ramos, P., Sakakibara, H., Kiba, T., Ludwig-Müller, J., Krapp, A., Oelmüller, R., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., & Pollmann, S. (2022). The calcium sensor CBL7 is required for Serendipita indica-induced growth stimulation in Arabidop-sis thaliana, controlling defence against the endophyte and K+ homeostasis in the symbiosis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 45(11), 3367–3382. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14420
Mahdi, L. K., Miyauchi, S., Uhlmann, C., Garrido-Oter, R., Langen, G., Wawra, S., Niu, Y., Guan, R., Robertson-Albertyn, S., Bulgarelli, D., van der Heijden, M. G. A., & Zuccaro, A. (2022). The fungal root endophyte Serendipita vermifera displays inter-kingdom synergistic beneficial effects with the microbiota in Arabidopsis and barley. The ISME Journal, 16(3), 876–889. https://doi.or g/10.1038/s41396-021-01138-y
González Ortega-Villaizán, A., King, E., Patel, M. K., Pérez-Alonso, M.-M., Scholz, S. S., Sakakibara, H., Kiba, T., Kojima, M., Takebayashi, Y., Ramos, P., Morales-Quintana, L., Breitenbach, S., Smolko, A., Salopek-Sondi, B., Bauer, N., Ludwig-Müller, J., Krapp, A., Oelmüller, R., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., & Pollmann, S. (2024). The endophytic fun-gus Serendipita indica affects auxin distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana roots through alteration of auxin transport and conjugation to promote plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment, 47(10), 3899–3919. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.
Tefera, T., & Vidal, S. (2009). Effect of inocula-tion method and plant growth medium on en-dophytic colonization of sorghum by the ento-mopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Bio-Control, 54(5), 663–669. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s10526-009-9216-y
Sinno, M., Ranesi, M., Di Lelio, I., Iacomino, G., Becchimanzi, A., Barra, E., Molisso, D., Pen-nacchio, F., Digilio, M. C., Vitale, S., Turrà, D., Harizanova, V., Lorito, M., & Woo, S. L. (2021). Selection of endophytic Beauveria bassiana as a dual biocontrol agent of tomato pathogens and pests. Pathogens, 10(10), 1242. https: //doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101242
Proietti, S., Falconieri, G. S., Bertini, L., Pascale, A., Bizzarri, E., Morales-Sanfrutos, J., Sabidó, E., Ruocco, M., Monti, M. M., Russo, A., Dziurka, K., Ceci, M., Loreto, F., & Caruso, C. (2023). Beau-veria bassiana rewires molecular mechanisms related to growth and defence in tomato. Jour-nal of Experimental Botany, 74(14), 4225–4243. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad148
Sui, L., Lu, Y., Zhou, L. Y., Li, N. N., Li, Q. Y., & Zhang, Z. K. (2023). Endophytic Beauveria bassiana pro-motes plant biomass growth and suppresses pathogen damage by directional recruitment. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1227269. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1227269
Caradus, J. R., & Johnson, L. J. (2020). Epichloë fungal endophytes—From a biological curiosity in wild grasses to an essential component of resilient high-performing ryegrass and fescue pastures. Journal of Fungi, 6(4), 322. https: //doi.org/10.3390/jof6040322
Zhang, W., Forester, N. T., Moon, C. D., Maclean, P. H., Gagic, M., Arojju, S. K., Card, S. D., Matthew, C., Johnson, R. D., Johnson, L. J., Faville, M. J., & Voisey, C. R. (2022). Epichloë seed transmis-sion efficiency is influenced by plant defence re-sponse mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1025698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fp ls.2022.1025698
Richardson, K. A., de Bonth, A. C. M., Beechey-Gradwell, Z., Kadam, S., Cooney, L. J., Nelson, K. A., Cookson, R., Winichayakul, S., Reid, M., An-derson, P., Crowther, T., Zou, X., Maher, D., Xue, H., Scott, R. W., Allan, A., Johnson, R. D., Card, S. D., Mace, W. J., ... Bryan, G. (2023). Epichloë fungal endophyte interactions in perennial rye-grass modified to accumulate foliar lipids for in-creased energy density. BMC Plant Biology, 23, 636. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023 -04635-8
Truyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., & Van-gronsveld, J. (2015). Bacterial seed endophytes: Genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 7(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758 -2229.12181
Abdelfattah, A., Wisniewski, M., Schena, L., & Tack, A. J. M. (2021). Experimental evidence of microbial inheritance in plants and transmission routes from seed to phyllosphere and root. Envi-ronmental Microbiology, 23(4), 2199–2214. http s://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15392
Kim, H., Lee, K. K., Jeon, J., Harris, W. A., & Lee, Y. H. (2022). Domestication of Oryza species eco-evolutionarily shapes bacterial and fungal com-munities in rice seed. Microbiome, 10, 20. https: //doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01203-2
Bordoloi, L. J., Chakpram, B., Banerjee, M., Deb-nath, A., & Das, R. (2026). Rhizosphere micro-biome restructuring enhances nutrient use effi-ciency and crop yield: Mechanisms, innovations, and future perspectives. Public Health – Open Journal, 11(1), 192–202. https://doi.org/10 .17140/PHOJ.11.01.192
Debnath, A., Sarkar, A., Pongen, M., & Devi, H. L. (2022). Role of bioactive compounds and ar-tificial intelligence tools in advancing modern horticulture. Journal of Food and Biotechnology, 3(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.51470/FAB.2 022.3.2.01
Hacquard, S., Kracher, B., Hiruma, K., Münch, P. C., Garrido-Oter, R., Thon, M. R., Weimann, A., Damm, U., Dallery, J. F., Hainaut, M., Henrissat, B., Lespinet, O., Sacristán, S., Ver Loren van The-maat, E., Kemen, E., McHardy, A. C., Schulze-Lefert, P., & O’Connell, R. J. (2016). Survival trade-offs in plant roots during colonization by closely related beneficial and pathogenic fungi. Nature Communications, 7, 11362. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms11362
Carlström, C. I., Field, C. M., Bortfeld-Miller, M., Müller, B., Sunagawa, S., & Vorholt, J. A. (2019). Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(10), 1445–1454. ht tps://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-099 4-z
Chowdhury, R., Handique, G., Debnath, A., & Venkataraja, R. R. (2026). Metagenomic analysis of soil microbial communities under regenera-tive and conventional agriculture. Public Health – Open Journal, 11(1), 363–370. https://doi. org/10.17140/PHOJ.11.01.363
Debnath, A., Alie, B. A., Malik, G. C., & Langlen-tombi, L. C. (2026). Interactive effects of heat and drought stress on crop growth and yield forma-tion. Public Health – Open Journal, 11(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.17140/PHOJ.11.01.75
Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Langenbach, C. J. G., & Jaskiewicz, M. R. (2015). Priming for en-hanced defense. Annual Review of Phytopathol-ogy, 53, 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-phyto-080614-120132
Mauch-Mani, B., Baccelli, I., Luna, E., & Flors, V. (2017). Defense priming: An adaptive part of in-duced resistance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 68, 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1146/an nurev-arplant-042916-041132
Abbas, M. M., Ismael, W. H., Mahfouz, A. Y., Daigham, G. E., & Attia, M. S. (2024). Efficacy of en-dophytic bacteria as promising inducers for en-hancing the immune responses in tomato plants and managing Rhizoctonia root-rot disease. Sci-entific Reports, 14, 1331. https://doi.org/10 .1038/s41598-023-51000-8
Santhanam, R., Luu, V. T., Weinhold, A., Gold-berg, J., Oh, Y., & Baldwin, I. T. (2015). Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during con-tinuous cropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer-ica, 112(36), E5013–E5020. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1505765112
Berendsen, R. L., Vismans, G., Yu, K., Song, Y., de Jonge, R., Burgman, W. P., Burmølle, M., Her-schend, J., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2018). Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. The ISME Jour-nal, 12(6), 1496–1507. https://doi.org/10.1 038/s41396-018-0093-1
Carrión, V. J., Perez-Jaramillo, J., Cordovez, V., Tracanna, V., de Hollander, M., Ruiz-Buck, D., Mendes, L. W., van Ijcken, W. F. J., Gomez-Exposito, R., Elsayed, S. S., Mohanraju, P., Arifah, A., van der Oost, J., Paulson, J. N., Mendes, R., van Wezel, G. P., Medema, M. H., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2019). Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root mi-crobiome. Science, 366(6465), 606–612. https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9285
Durán, P., Thiergart, T., Garrido-Oter, R., Agler, M., Kemen, E., Schulze-Lefert, P., & Hacquard, S. (2018). Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell, 175(4), 973–983.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2018.10.020
Herpell, J. B., Alickovic, A., Diallo, B., Schindler, F., & Weckwerth, W. (2023). Phyllosphere symbiont promotes plant growth through ACC deaminase production. The ISME Journal, 17(8), 1267–1277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-0 1428-7
Yang, Z., Qiao, Y., Konakalla, N. C., Strøbech, E., Harris, P., Peschel, G., Agler-Rosenbaum, M., We-ber, T., Andreasson, E., & Ding, L. (2023). Strep-tomyces alleviate abiotic stress in plants by pro-ducing pteridic acids. Nature Communications, 14, 7398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467 -023-43177-3
Hou, S., Wolinska, K. W., Hacquard, S., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2021). Microbiota–root–shoot circuit favours Arabidopsis growth over defence under suboptimal light. Nature Plants, 7(8), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-0 0956-4
Feng, Q., Luo, Y., Liang, M., Cao, Y., Wang, L., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Ren, L., Wang, Y., Wang, D., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiao, B., & Li, N. (2025). Rhizobacteria protective hydrogel to promote plant growth and adaption to acidic soil. Nature Communications, 16, 1684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467 -025-56988-3
Emmenegger, B., Massoni, J., Pestalozzi, C. M., Bortfeld-Miller, M., Maier, B. A., & Vorholt, J. A. (2023). Identifying microbiota community pat-terns important for plant protection using syn-thetic communities and machine learning. Na-ture Communications, 14, 7983. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-023-43793-z
Debnath, A., Mohanty, A. K., Devi, P. B., Nath, L., Suklabaidya, A., Longkumer, T. E., Birendrajit, C., Das, R., Langlentombi, L. C., Halder, A., Datta, H. S., Roy, S., & Irenaeus, T. K. S. (2026). Integrated nutrient management improves yield and fruit quality of banana (Musa sp.) cv. Sabri in north-ern Tripura, India: Yield gap analysis, technology development and adoption. International Jour-nal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, 10(4S), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.33545/2617469
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Public Health - Open Journal (PHOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
