Effects of Using Birth Ball and Peanut Ball For Pregnant Women in Labour: Randomised Control Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj-11-663Keywords:
Birth ball, Peanut ball, Labour pain, Non-pharmacological pain relief, Vaginal delivery, Maternal outcomes, Labour management, Pain reductionAbstract
Introduction: Childbirth, while a natural physiological process, poses significant challenges due to intense
labour pain caused by ischemic changes in the uterus, cervical stretching, and tissue damage in the perineum.
Non-pharmacological methods, such as the use of birth balls and peanut balls, have emerged as effective
tools to alleviate pain, reduce anxiety, and improve labour outcomes without the side effects associated
with pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these interventions on
labour progress, pain relief, and delivery outcomes.
Methodlogy: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Adichunchanagiri Hospital and Research
Centre over 18 months. Participants included primigravida and multigravida women with singleton pregnan-
cies in cephalic presentation and gestational ages over 37 weeks. Using block randomization, 128 women
were divided into two groups: a trial group utilizing birth and peanut balls and a control group receiving
standard care. The trial group underwent training sessions to perform exercises such as pelvic rocking and
squatting, designed to improve pelvic mobility and fetal alignment. Pain levels were assessed using the
Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and outcomes were analyzed using SPSS software with a significance threshold of
p < 0.05.
Results: The trial group exhibited significantly better outcomes in labour progress and pain management
compared to the control group. Cervical dilation rates were higher in the trial group (Bishop’s Score 6–8:
84.4% vs. 51.6%; p=0.00), and total labour duration was shorter (621.47 ± 158.414 minutes vs. 702 ± 149.603
minutes; p=0.022). Pain scores after exercise were significantly reduced in the trial group (VAS score: 5.75 ±
0.617 vs. 8.92 ± 0.27; p<0.001). Normal vaginal deliveries were more frequent in the trial group (84.3% vs.
65.6%; p=0.045), and cesarean section rates were lower (12.5% vs. 26.6%; p=0.045).
Conclusion: Birth and peanut balls offer a gentle, non-invasive, and effective method for pain relief and improved labour outcomes. They present a valuable addition to routine obstetric care and should be in-
corporated into clinical practice to enhance maternal and neonatal health. Future multi-center trials are recommended to validate these findings and explore their long-term impacts.
References
Khresheh R, Barclay L, Shoqirat N. Caring be-haviours by midwives: Jordanian women’s per-ceptions during childbirth. Midwifery. 2019;74:1- 5.
Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of sys-tematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(3):CD009234.
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.
Al-Seady MY, Fadel EA, El-Gohary AM. Labor pain and satisfaction of primipara assume upright. IOSR JNHS. 2017;6(4):24-30.
Aquino CI, Guida M, Saccone G, Cruz Y, Vitagliano A, Zullo F, et al. Perineal massage during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of random-ized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(6):1051-63.
Grenvik JM, Rosenthal E, Saccone G, Corte LD, Quist-Nelson J, Gerkin RD, et al. Peanut ball for de-creasing length of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;242:159-65.
Grenvik JM, Rosenthal E, Wey S, Saccone G, De Vivo V, De Prisco Lcp A, et al. Birthing ball for re-ducing labor pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5184-93.
Kamath P, Pai M, Shenoy R, Karkada S, D’Souza S, Noronha J. Effectiveness of a peanut ball de-vice during labour on maternal and neonatal out-comes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Res. 2022;11(717):1-14.
Supporting healthy and normal physiologic child-birth: a consensus statement by ACNM, MANA, and NACPM. J Perinat Educ. 2013;22(1):14-8.
World Health Organization Maternal and New-born Health/Safe Motherhood Unit. Care in nor-mal birth: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization. Birth. 1997;24(2):121-3.
Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):S160-72.
Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2(2):CD003934.
Adachi K, Shimada M, Usui A. The relationship be-tween the parturient’s positions and perceptions of labor pain intensity. Nurs Res. 2003;52(1):47-51.
Tussey CM, Botsios E, Gerkin RD, Kelly LA, Gamez J, Mensik J. Reducing length of labor and Cesarean surgery rate using a peanut ball for women labor-ing with an epidural. J Perinat Educ. 2015;24(1):16- 24.
Roth C, Dent SA, Parfitt SE, Hering SL, Bay RC. Randomized controlled trial of use of the peanut ball during labor. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2016;41(3):140-6.
Ahmadpour P, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Doosti R, Mirghafourvand M. Use of the peanut ball during labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Open. 2021;8(5):2345-53.
Johnson N, Nokomis Z, Stark MA. The nurses’ role in providing comfort during childbirth using ambulation and hydrotherapy. Int J Stud Nurs. 2017;3(1):123-31.
Thies-Lagergren L, Hildingsson I, Christensson K, Kvist LJ. Who decides the position for birth? A follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial. Women Birth. 2013;26(4):e99-104.
Eprila E, Sari NP, Hidayati N, Meilati ND. Effective-ness of using peanut ball on the progress of 1st stage of childbirth in BPM Palembang City: Social Sciences and Technology; 2021.
Delgado A, Katz L, Melo RS, Amorim M, Lemos A. Effectiveness of the peanut ball use for women with epidural analgesia in labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(5):726-33.
Bell AD, Joy S, Gullo S. Implementing a systematic approach to reduce cesarean birth rates in nulli-parous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1082- 9.
Stulz U, d’Entremont M, Marshall K. Effects of ma-ternal positioning with birth balls on labor out-comes: a randomized controlled trial. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2018;63(2):164-70.
Delgado A, Maia T. Birth ball exercises for pain management in labor: a systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:1-6.
Birth ball for pregnant women in labor: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Preg-nancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):512.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Public Health - Open Journal (PHOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
