The Misinfodemic and Its Effects on COVID-19 Preventive Strategies in Socially Vulnerable Populations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PHOJ-8-164Keywords:
Misinfodemic; COVID-19; Social media; Social determinants of health.Abstract
Throughout the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been disparate misinformation on those already experiencing health and social inequities. Misinformation from online communities, friends/family interpretation bias, and in-consistent information from content experts exacerbate an already weakened trust in the medical system among socially vulner-able populations. When trust in scientific evidence is low, susceptibility to misinformation is high. Although trust is an essential factor in susceptibility to misinformation, it cannot be the only lens through which the impact of misinformation on socially vulnerable populations is examined. Patients need scientifically valid information in the face of a flood of misinformation and conspiracy theories. This can be provided through public health campaigns, community workers, and all healthcare providers. Vigilance needs to be maintained to dispute any unwarranted information to keep the population healthy.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Social De-terminants of Health at CDC. Website. https://www.cdc.gov/ socialdeterminants/about.html. Published March 10, 2021. Ac-cessed August 28, 2021.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). CDC/ATSDR’s Social Vulnerability Index. Website. https:// www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html. Updated April 28, 2021. Accessed September 6, 2021.
Kim HK, Ahn J, Atkinson L, Kahlor LA. Effects of Covid-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and Process-ing: A multicountry comparative study. Sci Commun. 2020; 42(5): 586-615. doi: 10.1177/1075547020959670
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Un-derstanding Risk. Website. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavi-rus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/assess-ing-risk-factors.html. Published August 5, 2021. Accessed September 4, 2021.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Advancing 16 Ashley R and Rizzolo D Health Equity in Chronic Disease Prevention and Management. Website. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/healthequity/in-dex.htm. Updated March 11, 2020. Accessed August 21, 2021.
Papageorge NW, Zahn MV, Belot M, et al. Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the Cov-id-19 pandemic. J Popul Econ. 2021; 34(2): 691-738. doi: 10.1007/ s00148-020-00818-x
Geçer E, Yıldırım M, Akgül Ö. Sources of information in times of health crisis: Evidence from Turkey during COVID-19. J Public Health (Berl.). 2020; 30: 1113-1119. doi: 10.1007/s10389- 020-01393-x
Obiała J, Obiała K, Mańczak M, Owoc J, Olszewski R. COV-ID-19 misinformation: Accuracy of articles about CORONA-VIRUS prevention mostly shared on social media. Health Policy Technol. 2021; 10(1): 182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.10.007
Gerts D, Shelley CD, Parikh N, et al. “Thought I’d Share First”: an analysis of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and misinforma-tion spread on twitter. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021; 7(4): e26527. doi: 10.2196/26527
Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among healthcare professionals and its influence on health-care outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(12): 2588-2588. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302903a
Roozenbeek J, Schneider CR, Dryhurst S, et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020; 7(10): 201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199
Viswanath K, Lee EW, Pinnamaneni R. We need the lens of equity in COVID-19 Communication. Health Commun. 2020; 35(14): 1743-1746. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1837445
Al-Zaman MS. Social media and COVID-19 misinformation: How ignorant Facebook users are? Heliyon. 2021; 7(5): e07144. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07144
Pennycook G, Rand DG. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2019; 188: 39-50. doi: 10.1016/j. cognition.2018.06.011
Buchanan T. Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-report-ed likelihood of sharing social media disinformation. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10): e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
Kumar S, Shah N. False information on web and social media: A survey. arXiv.org. Website. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08559. Published April 23, 2018. Accessed September 7, 2021.
Choi D, Chun S, Oh H, Han J, Kwon TT. Rumor Propaga-tion is amplified by echo chambers in social media. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57272-3
Krause NM, Freiling I, Beets B. Fact-checking as RISK com-munication: The MULTI-LAYERED risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. J Risk Res. 2020; 23(7-8): 1052-1059. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385
Ruiz JB, Bell RA. Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Results of a nationwide survey. Vaccine. 2021; 39(7): 1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.010
Qiao S, Li Z, Liang C, Li X, Rudisill CA. Risk perception of COVID-19 and its socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis. medRxiv. 2021; 2021.01.27.21250654. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250654
Seo H, Blomberg M, Altschwager D, Vu HT. Vulnerable pop-ulations, and misinformation: A mixed-methods approach to un-derserved older adults’ online information assessment. New Me-dia Soc. 2021; 23(7): 2012-2033. doi: 10.1177/1461444820925041
De keersmaecker J, Roets A. ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. the role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence. 2017; 65: 107-110. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.005
Christy SM, Gwede CK, Sutton SK, et al. Health literacy among medically Underserved: The role of demographic fac-tors, social influence, and religious beliefs. J Health Commun. 2017; 22(11): 923-931. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1377322
Enders AM, Uscinski JE, Klofstad C, Stoler J. The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. Har Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2020; 1(8). doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-48
Hildreth JEK, Alcendor DJ. Targeting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in minority populations in the US: Implications for herd immunity. Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(5): 489. doi: 10.3390/vac-cines9050489
Kulkarni P, Prabhu S, Kumar S, Ramraj B. COVID-19- In-fodemic OVERTAKING Pandemic? Time to DISSEMINATE facts over fear. Indian J Community Health. 2020; 32(2 (Supp): 264- 268. doi: 10.47203/ijch.2020.v32i02supp.018
Lewandowsky S, Cook J, Ecke et al. Debunking Handbook 2020. NY, USA: New York University Library; 2020. doi: 10.17910/ b7.1182
An L, Bacon E, Hawley S, et al. Relationship between coro-navirus-related eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge, atti-tudes, and practices among US adults: Web-based survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(3): e25042. doi: 10.2196/25042 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 8 | Number 1 | Ashley R and Rizzolo D
Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(2): e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9
Guo Z, Zhao SZ, Guo N, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eHealth literacy and preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(4): e24577. doi: 10.2196/24577
Tichenor PJ, Donohue GA, Olien CN. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opin Q. 1970; 34(2): 159- 170. doi: 10.1086/267786
Chesser A, Burke A, Reyes J, Rohrberg T. Navigating the digi-tal divide: A systematic review of eHealth literacy in underserved populations in the United States. Inform Health Soc Care. 2015; 41(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2014.948171
Beaunoyer E, Dupéré S, Guitton MJ. COVID-19 and DIG-ITAL inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strate-gies. Comput Human Behav. 2020; 111: 106424. doi: 10.1016/j. chb.2020.106424
Lin L, Savoia E, Agboola F, Viswanath K. What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pan-demic: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 484. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-484
Ataguba OA, Ataguba JE. Social determinants of health: The role of effective communication in the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries. Glob Health Action. 2020; 13(1): 1788263. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1788263
Hughes B, Miller-Idriss C, Piltch-Loeb R, et al. Develop-ment of a codebook of online anti-vaccination rhetoric to man-age COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(14): 7556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147556
Hoffman BL, Colditz JB, Shensa A, et al. #DoctorsSpeakUp: Lessons learned from a pro-vaccine Twitter event. Vaccine. 2021; 39(19): 2684-2691. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.061
Gagneur A. Motivational interviewing: A powerful tool to ad-dress vaccine hesitancy. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2020; 46(4): 93-97. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i04a06
World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus dis-ease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Mythbusters. Website. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavi-rus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters. Updated May 5, 2021. Accessed September 7, 2021.
MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitan-cy. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vac-cine. 2015; 33(34): 4161-4164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Public Health - Open Journal (PHOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
