Navigating the Medical Disability Assessment and Personal Injury Claims Landscape in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PHOJ-8-166Keywords:
Expert report; Injuries and illness; Judicial system; Medical compensation; Medical disability and personal claims.Abstract
IntroductionIndividuals who have sustained permanent residual disabilities due to injuries or illnesses and relevant stakeholders engaged in the adjudication process persistently encounter obstacles in accessing equitable and just systems for assessment, support, and facilitation. These systems enable such individuals to secure appropriate compensation and lead fulfilling lives within their communities.ObjectiveThis stakeholder engagement process explores the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities and their journey through the claims processes, understanding their concerns and expectations.ResultsA total of 152 participants participated in the seminar. Thirty-nine participants with extensive experience in medical disabil-ity assessment and the claims process were purposefully surveyed, and in-depth interviews were conducted. Several themes emerged from the interview: awareness and education, the legal and judicial system and processes, expert opinion, and reports.ConclusionThe findings concluded that expert opinion and report emerged as a critical theme, with participants stressing the need for guidelines, professionalism, and accreditation for expert witnesses. Establishing a multidisciplinary regulatory body to design and develop an educational program for court experts is suggested, as is creating and maintaining a public register of court experts. Such measures will promote transparency, accountability, and quality in expert testimony and reporting
References
‘Civil Law Act 1956 (Revised 1972). Website. http://www. commonlii.org/my/legis/consol_act/cla19561972179/#:~:tex-t=When%20any%20person%20dies%20or,it%20appears%20 by%20the%20will. Accessed November 7, 2023.
Ibid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibid. Accessed November 7, 2023.
Bishop W. Economic loss in tort. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1982; 2(1): 1-29. doi: 10.1093/ojls/2.1.1
Elbers NA, Akkermans AJ, Lockwood K, Craig A, Cameron ID. Factors that challenge health for people involved in the com-pensation process following a motor vehicle crash: A longitudinal Original Research | Volume 8 | Number 1 | Singh SK, et al study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 339. doi: 10.1186/s12889- 015-1694-5
Okrent C. Torts and Personal Injury Law. NY, USA: Delmar Cen-gage Learning; 2014.
Morris A. Spiralling or stabilising? The compensation cul-ture and our propensity to claim damages for personal inju-ry. Modern Law Review. 2007; 70(3): 349. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 2230.2007.00642.x
Abedi M, Aplin T, Gane E, Johnston V. Exploring the per-spectives of key stakeholders in returning to work after minor to serious road traffic injuries: A qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 33(1): 93-106. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10051-w
Rotenberg S, Gatta DR, Wahedi A, Loo R, McFadden E, Ryan S. Disability training for health workers: A global evidence synthesis. Disabil Health J. 2022; 15(2): 101260. doi: 10.1016/j. dhjo.2021.101260
Brauer HU, Walther W, Riesen C, Dick M. Training for legal dental expert witnesses in Germany: An instrument for pro-fessional development. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76(5): 656-660. doi:
1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.5.tb05300.x 10. Iacobucci HF, Hamilton G. The goudge inquiry and the role of medical expert witnesses. CMAJ. 2010; 182(1): 53-56. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090833
Bonnett DR. The use of colossus to measure the general damages of a personal injury claim demonstrates good faith claims handling. Cleveland State Law Review. 2005; 53: 107.
Green MD, Sanders J. Admissability versus sufficiency: Con-trolling the quality of expert witness testimony. Wake Forest Law Review. 2015; 50: 1057. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2016468
Mc Sween-Cadieux E, Dagenais C, Ridde V. A deliberative di-alogue as a knowledge translation strategy on road traffic injuries in burkina faso: A mixed-method evaluation. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2018; 16(1): 113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0388-8
Tsoi Yat Chung E. Mediation indicator checklist for personal injury cases. Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies. 2011; 5: 123.
Chan WH, Chan WS, Li SH. How much is a leg worth in Hong Kong? Proposal for reforming personal injury compensa-tion. Hong Kong Law Journal. 2020; 50: 983.
Lewis R, Morris A, Oliphant K. Tort personal injury claims statistics: Is there a compensation culture in the United King-dom? Torts Law Journal. 2006; 14(2): 158-175.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Public Health - Open Journal (PHOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.