Uptake of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Characterization of Breast Masses: Perceptions among Staff at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-4-123Keywords:
Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS), Breast, Ultrasound, Staff perceptionsAbstract
Introduction
The Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is a classification system aimed at standardizing risk assessment during
breast ultrasound to ensure patient safety. BI-RADS is currently used in Uganda so as to standardize breast ultrasound reporting
and enhance patient management.
Objective
This study aimed at exploring staff perceptions towards the use of the BI-RADS ultrasound characterization of breast masses.
Methodology
It was an exploratory qualitative study that involved staff who perform breast ultrasound at Mulago Hospital in Uganda. Focus
group discussions and individual interviews were conducted.
Findings
All staff used the BI-RADS system, however, some of them had a negative attitude towards BI-RADS. The three major themes
that emerged were: standardization of breast ultrasound reporting for patient safety; need for more Continuous Professional Development
(CPD) and challenges with the BI-RADS system.
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that the staff generally had positive perceptions and attitude of the BI-RADS system and felt that it was
an efficient system for ensuring patient safety and further reduce mortality from breast cancer.
References
Galukande M, Mirembe F, Wabinga H. Patient delay in ac-cessing breast cancer care in a sub Saharan African country: Uganda. Br J Med Med Res. 2014, 4: 2599-2610. doi: 10.9734/ BJMMR/2014/7293#sthash.PglzE4b6.dpuf
Gakwaya A, Kigula-Mugambe JB, Kavuma A, et al. Cancer of the breast: 5 year survival in a tertiary Hospital in Uganda. Br J Original Research | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Mubuuke AG et al Cancer. 2008; 8: 99(1): 63-67. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604435
Okello J, Kisembo H, Bugeza S, Galukande M. Breast cancer de-tection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts. BMC Med Imaging. 2014; 14: 41. doi: 10.1186/s12880-014- 0041-0
DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015; 24: 1495-1506. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0535
Odusanya OO, Tayo OO. Breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and practice among nurses in Lagos, Nigeria. Acta Oncol. 2001; 40: 844-848. doi: 10.1080/02841860152703472
Sadler GR, Dhanjal SK, Shah NB. Asian Indian women: Knowl-edge, attitudes and behaviour toward breast cancer early detec-tion. Public Health Nurs. 2001; 18: 357-363. doi: 10.1046/j.1525- 1446.2001.00357.x
Sadler GR, Ryujin LT, Ko CM. Korean women: Breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. BMC Public Health. 2001; 1: 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-7
Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J. Predictors of mammogra-phy use among Canadian women aged 50-69: Findings from the 1996/1997 national population health survey. CMAJ. 2001; 164: 329-334.
Dibble SL, Vanoni JM, Miaskowski C. Women´s attitudes to-ward breast cancer screening procedures: Differences by ethinic-ity. Women’s Health Issues. 1997; 7(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1016/S1049- 3867(96)00048-5
Ferro S, Caroli A, Nanni O, Biggeri A, Gambi A. A cross-sectional survey on breast self-examination practice, utilization of breast professional examination, mammography and asso-ciated factors in Romagna, Italy. Tumori. 1992; 78: 98-105. doi: 10.1177/030089169207800207
Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D, et al. Mammographic screen-ing: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma sur-vival. Cancer. 2004; 101(3): 495-507. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20392
Sankaranarayanan R. Strategies for implementation of screen-ing programs in low-and medium-resource settings. Paper present-ed at: UICC World Cancer Congress; 2006; Washington, DC, USA.
Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005; 293(10): 1245-1256. doi: 10.1001/ jama.293.10.1245
Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: Updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet. 2002; 359(9310): 909-919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0
Lee EO, Ahn SH, You C, et al. Determining the main risk fac-tors and high-risk groups of breast cancer using a predictive mod-el for breast cancer risk assessment in South Korea. Cancer Nurs. 2004; 27(5): 400-406.
Lubish L, Greenberg S, Friger M. Breast cancer screening in two multicultural family practice teaching clinics. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001; 3: 579-583.
Kailash S, Tariq A, Ghanshyam DG. The accuracy of ultra-sound in diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. JK Science. 2008; 10: 186-188.
Scheel JR, Nealey EM, Orem J, et al. ACR BI-RADS use in low-income countries: An analysis of diagnostic breast ultra-sound practice in Uganda. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13: 163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.035
Umanah IN, Akhiwu W, Ojo OS. Breast tumours of adoles-cents in an African population. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010; 7: 78-80. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.62849
American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-Ultra-sound. Reston, VA, USA: American College of Radiology; 2003. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Yip CH, Smith RA, Anderson BO, et al. Guideline implemen-tation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Early detection resource allocation. Cancer. 2009; 113: 2244-2256. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23842
Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, et al. Observer variability of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 65: 293-298. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2007.04.008
Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: Interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006; 239: 385-391. doi: 10.1148/radi-ol.2392042127
Hong AS1, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for so-nography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1260-1265. doi: 10.2214/ ajr.184.4.01841260
Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, et al. The ACR BI-RADS experience: Learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6: 851- 860. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.023
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Radiology (ROJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.