Partnerships in Civic Engagement: Cultivating Transformational Campus-Community Relationships Built to Last
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-1-105Keywords:
Service-learning, Community engaged learning, Campus-community partnership, Civic engagementAbstract
A critical feature of contemporary models of civic engagement is mutually-beneficial collabo ration between campus and community partners, in which all members contribute knowledge, skills, and experience to co-create knowledge. To date, most research has focused on student outcomes, and we know much less about how to develop successful campus-community partnerships. This article reviews the challenges and opportunities in establishing and maintaing these partnerships to address issues in Trenton, NJ, USA. We first review best practices for developing partnerships between potential stakeholders on campus and in the community. We then describe the infrastructure at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ) that supports the development of these partnerships and present 3 case studies that highlight how they were maintained to offer a range of civic engagement activities that benefit all stakeholders involved in the collaboration. Finally, we present recommendations for developing and maintaining partnerships at other institutions.
References
Bringle RG, Hatcher JA, Clayton PH. The scholarship of ci-vic engagement: Defining, documenting, and evaluating faculty work. To Improve the Academy. 2006; 25: 257-279. Web site. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/9619. Accessed Au-gust 30, 2016.
Bringle RG, Hatcher JA, Holland B. Conceptualizing civic engagement: Orchestrating change at a metropolitan university. Metropolitan Universities. 2007; 18(3): 57-74. Web site. http:// eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ878232. Accessed August 30, 2016.
Strand KJ, Cutforth N, Stoecker R, Marullo S, Donohue P. Community-Based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices. San Francisco, CA, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. A Crucible Moment: College Learning and De-mocracy’s Future. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Ame-rican Colleges and Universities; 2012.
Bringle RG, Steinberg K. Educating for informed community involvement. Am J Community Psychol. 2010; 46(3-4): 428- 441. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9340-y
Clayton PH, Bringle RG, Hatcher J. Research on Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Assessment. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus; 2013.
Conway JM, Amel EL, Gerwien DP. Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning’s effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teach Psy-chol. 2009; 36(4): 233-245. doi: 10.1080/00986280903172969
Finley A. Civic Learning and Democratic Engagements: A Review of the Literature on Civic Engagement in Post-Seconda-ry Education. Paper prepared for the United States Department of Education as part of Contract: ED-OPE-10-C-0078; 2011.
Kuh GD. High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Washing-ton, DC, USA: Association of American Colleges and Universi-ties; 2008.
Ray D. Campus-community partnership: A stubborn com-mitment to reciprocal relationships. Diversity and Democracy. 2016; 19(2): 1.
Clayton PH, Bringle RG, Senor B, Huq J, Morrison M. Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitative, transactional, or transfor-mational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 2010; 16(2): 5-22.
Campus Compact. 2015 Annual Membership Survey: Exe-cutive Summary. 2015. Web site. http://kdp0l43vw6z2dlw631i-fifc5.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ CC_AnnualSurvey_ExecutiveSummary_FINAL.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2016.
Hackett R, Donohue P. The growing edge for community en-gagement: Partnership and policy networks. In: Hoy A, Johnson M, eds. Deepening Community Engagement in Higher Educa-tion. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013: 105-117.
Bringle RG, Clayton PH. Conceptual framework for partnerships in service learning. In: Clayton PH, Bringle RG, Hatcher JA, eds. Research on Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Assessment. Arlington, VA, USA: Stylus; 2012.
Bringle RG, Clayton PH, Price M. Partnerships in ser-vice learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service-Learning and Civic Engagement. 2009; 1(1): 1-20. Web site. http://www.campusengage.ie/userfiles/files/nccc%20 bringle%20clayton%20price.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2016
Benson L, Harkavy I, Puckett J. Dewey’s Dream: Universi-ties and Democracies in An Age of Education Reform. Philadel-phia, USA: Temple University Press; 2007.
Morton K, Saltmarsh J. Addams, Day, and Dewey: The emergence of community service in American culture. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 1997; 5: 137-149.
Saltmarsh J, Hartley M, Clayton PH. Democratic Engage-ment White Paper. Boston, USA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education; 2009.
Ward K, Wolf-Wendel L. Community-centered service lear-ning: Moving from doing for to doing with. Am Behav Sci. 2000; 43(5): 767-780. doi: 10.1177/00027640021955586
Bortolin K. Serving ourselves: How the discourse on com-munity engagement privileges the university over the commu-nity. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 2011; 18(1): 49-58.
Cruz N, Giles D. Where’s the community in service-learning research? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 2000; 7: 28-34.
Howard J. Service-learning research: Foundational issues. In: Billig SH, Waterman AS, eds. Studying Service-Learning: Innovations in Education Research Methodology. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003: 1-10.
Stoecker R. Liberating Service Learning and the Rest of Higher Education Civic Engagement. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press; 2016.
Vernon A, Ward K. Campus and community partnerships: Assessing impacts and strengthening connections. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 1999; 6(1): 30-37.
Stoecker R, Tryon EA. The Unheard Voices: Community Or-ganizations and Service Learning. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press; 2009.
Enos S, Morton K. Developing a theory and practice of cam-pus-community partnerships. In: Associates JB, ed. Building Partnerships for Service Learning. San Francisco, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003: 20-41.
Saleebey D. The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Prac-tice. 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: Allyn and Bacon; 2011.
American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. Web site. http://factfinder.census.gov. Accessed August 30, 2016.
New Jersey Department of Education. 2012 Adjusted cohort 4-year graduation rate. 2012. Web site. http://www.state.Orga-nization 1.us/education/data/grate/2012/. Accessed August 30, 2016.
New Jersey Department of Education. 2015 Graduation Rates. 2016. Web site. http://www.state.nj.us/education/data/ grate/2015/. Accessed August 30, 2016.
U.S. Census Bureau. Census of Population and Housing: 1970 Census Tracts Final Report PHC(1)-217 Trenton, NJ SMSA. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Printing Of-fice; 1972.
Malerba H, Bates DC. Does participation in enrichment activities affect overall performance of elementary and middle school students?: An evaluation of the relationships between TCNJ Bonner Center and Hedgepath-Williams K-8 School. Un-dergraduate Journal of Service Learning and Community-Based Research. 2014; 3: 1-17.
New Jersey Department of Education. Enrollment 2014- 2015. 2015. http://www.nj.gov/education/data/enr/enr15/stat_ doc.htm. Accessed August 30, 2016.
New Jersey Department of Education. 2014-15 School Per-formance Reports. 2015. Web site. https://homeroom5.doe.state. nj.us/pr/. Accessed August 30, 2016.
New Jersey Department of Education. 2011-2012 School Performance Reports. 2012. Web site. https://homeroom5.doe. state.nj.us/pr/. Accessed August 30, 2016.
McDaniel J. In the beginning is the listening. In: Ray DK, ed. Theology that Matters: Ecology, Economy, and God. Minneapo-lis, MN, USA: Fortress Press; 2006: 26-41.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Social Behavior Research and Practice (SBRP) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.