A Qualitative Approach to Exploring Short-Term Service Learning and Civic Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-3-111Keywords:
Service-learning (SL), Community-engaged learning, Student development, Qualitative researchAbstract
Introduction
A growing number of universities and colleges across the United States have committed to civic engagement activities, particularly
short-term service-learning (SL). Limited research, however, is available about the effects of short-term SL experiences on student
development.
Objectives
The current study attempts to address research gaps in our understanding of this pedagogical technique by conducting qualitative
interviews with students involved in a short-term SL project.
Methods
In this qualitative study, five students (N=5) reported on their short-term SL experience as they related to the following outcomes:
(1) Community Service Self Efficacy (CSSE); (2) Community Service Group Efficacy (CSGE); (3) conceptualizations about power,
oppression and privilege (POP); (4) attitudes towards marginalized populations being served and (5) citizenship outcomes (such as
personal responsibility, participatory citizenship, and justice-oriented citizenship).
Results
Students reported changes in their beliefs about the ability to create positive social change in communities, as well as their perceptions of marginalized groups. In addition, spending time with and directly hearing the perspective of individuals who have been
marginalized in society helped to reduce intergroup anxiety and motivate students to be involved formally and informally in civic activities that can help to improve community-level outcomes.
Conclusion
Findings suggest that well-designed short-term SL experiences have the potential to shape important student perceptions and
intentions regarding civic engagement. This finding is particularly valuable because this pedagogical technique is growing in pop
ularity in higher education. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of promoting best practices in SL and other
community-engaged learning experiences.
References
Fitzgerald HE, Primavera J, eds. Going Public: Civic and Commu-nity Engagement. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University Press; 2013.
Campus Compact. 2015 Annual Membership Survey: Executive Summary. 2015. Web site. https://compact.org/initiatives/member-ship-survey/2015-annual-survey/. Accessed February 8, 2018.
Center For Service-Learning: Teaching, Research and Assess-ment [Internet].; Web site. http://csl.iupui.edu/teaching-research/ curriculum/course-design/index.shtml. Accessed February 8, 2018.
Jacoby B. Service-learning in today’s higher education: An over-view. In: Jacoby B, ed. Service-Learning in Bigher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 1996.
Weiler L, Haddock S, Zimmerman TS, Krafchick J, Henry K, Rudisill S. Benefits derived by college students from mentoring at-risk youth in a service-learning course. Am J Community Psychol. 2013; 52(3-4): 236-248. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9589-z
Smart D, Sanson A, Da Silva L, Toumbourou J. The develop-ment of civic mindedness in Australian adolescents. Family Matters. 2000; (57): 4-9.
Bringle RG, Hatcher JA. Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons. 1999; 77: 179-185.
Stoecker R, Tryon EA, eds. The Unheard Voices: Community Organ-izations and Service Learning. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Temple Univer-sity Press; 2009.
Conway JM, Amel EL, Gerwien DP. Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning’s effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teach Psychol. 2009; 36(4): 233-245. doi: 10.1080/00986280903172969
Eyler J, Giles D, Stenson C, Gray C. At a Glance: What we know About the Effects of Service-Learning on College Students, Faculty, Institu-tions and Communities, 1993-2000. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C., USA: Corporation for Learn and Serve America National Service Learn-ing Clearinghouse; 2001.
Finley A. Civic learning and democratic engagements: A review of the literature on civic engagement in post-secondary education. 2011.
Kuh GD. High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Washington, DC, USA: Association of American Colleges and Universities; 2008.
Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learn-ing and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall; 1984.
Yates M, Youniss J. A developmental perspective on commu-nity service in adolescence. Social Development. 1996; 5: 85-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00073.x
Reed VA, Jernstedt GC, Hawley JK, Reber ES, DuBois CA. Ef-fects of a small-scale, very short-term service-learning experience on college students. J Adolesc. 2005; 28(3): 359-368. doi: 10.1016/j. adolescence.2004.08.003
Bowman NA, Brandenberger JW, Mick CS, Smedley CT. Sus-tained immersion courses and student orientations to equality, jus-tice, and social responsibility: The role of short-term service-learn-ing. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 2010; 17(1): 20-31.
Tannenbaum SC, Barrett RD. Relevance of service-learning in college courses. Academic Exchange Quarterly. 2005; 9(1): 197-202.
Association of American Colleges & Universities. Civic Engage-ment Values Rubric. Washington, DC, USA: AAC&U, n.d.
Hixenbaugh P, Dewart H, Towell T. What enables students to succeed? An investigation of socio-demographic, health and stu-dent experience variables. Psychodynamic Practice. 2012; 18(3): 285- 301. doi: 10.1080/14753634.2012.695887
UML Office of Multicultural Affairs. Diversity and Social Justice: A Glossary of Working Definitions. Lowell, MA, USA: University of Massachusetts Lowell; 2007.
Reeb RN, Folger SF, Langsner S, Ryan C, Crouse J. Self-ef-ficacy in service-learning community action research: Theory, re-Original Research | Volume 3 | Number 1| Chung HL, et al search, and practice. Am J Community Psychol. 2010; 46: 459-471. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9342-9
Gest SD, Davidson AJ. A developmental perspective on risk, resilience, and prevention. In: Social Development: Relationships in In-fancy, Childhood, and Adolescence. 1st ed. New York, USA: The Guil-ford Press; 2011: 427-454.
Gibson CB, Randel AE, Earley PC. Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment meth-ods. Group & Organization Management. 2000; 25(1): 67-97. doi: 10.1177/1059601100251005
Hackman JR. Work teams in organizations: An orienting frame-work. In: Hackman JR, ed. Groups that Work (and those that don’t). San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 1990: 67-97.
Pescosolido AT. Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research. 2003; 34(1): 20-42. 10.1177/1046496402239576
Alavi SB, McCormick J. The roles of perceived task interde-pendence and group members’ interdependence in the develop-ment of collective efficacy in university student group contexts. Br J Educ Psychol. 2008; 78: 375-393. doi: 10.1348/000709907X240471
Jones S, Abes E. Enduring influences of service-learning on college students’ identity development. J Coll Stud Dev. 2004; 45(2): 149-166.
Davis C, White CW. How Porous are the Walls that Separate us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’s Incarceration, and the Unsettled self. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations. 2012; 34(1): 85-104.
Espino M, Lee J. Understanding resistance: Reflections on race and privilege through service-learning. Equity & Excellence in Edu-cation. 2013; 44(2): 136-152.
Ottenritter NW. Service learning, social justice, and cam-pus health. J Am Coll Health. 2004; 52(4): 189-192. doi: 10.3200/ JACH.52.4.189-192
Einfeld A, Collins D. The relationships between service-learn-ing, social justice, multicultural competence, and civic engagement. J Coll Stud Dev. 2008; 49(2): 95-109. doi: 10.1353/csd.2008.0017
Iverson SV, Allan EJ. Cultivating critical consciousness: Ser-vice-learning in higher education. INQUIRY: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 2004; 23(2): 51-61.
Westheimer J, Kahne J. What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal. 2004; 42: 237-269. doi: 10.3102/00028312041002237
Shumer R. Science or storytelling: How should we conduct and report service-learning research? Michigan Journal of Community Service. 2000; 1: 76-83.
U.S. Census Bureau. Census of Population and Housing: 1970 Census Tracts Final Report PHC(1)-217 Trenton, NJ SMSA. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Printing Office; 1972.
Dow PT, Fuentes JR, Bice LR, Nally W. Crime in New Jersey: For the year ending December 31, 2010.
McCracken GD. The Long Interview. 13th ed. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage; 1988. doi: 10.4135/9781412986229
Stephan WG. Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014; 18(3): 239-255. doi: 10.1177/
Stoecker R. Liberating Service Learning and the Rest of Higher Ed-ucation Civic Engagement. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Temple University Press; 2016.
Burke AS, Michael DB. Service learning and criminal justice: An exploratory study of student perceptions. Educational Review. 2013; 65(1): 56-69. doi: 10.1177/1088868314530518
Pettigrew T. Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998; 49(1): 65-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Dallinger C. An Integrated Theory of Prejudice Reduction through Ser-vice Learning: College Students' Interactions with Immigrant Children [Dis-sertation]. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University; 2015.
Conner J, Erickson J. When does service-learning work? Con-tact theory and service-learning courses in higher education. Mich-igan Journal of Community Service Learning. 2017; 23(2): 53-65. doi: 10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0023.204
Belli RF. The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory. 1998; 6(4): 383-406. doi: 10.1080/741942610
Eyler J. Reflection: Linking service and learning—linking students and communities. J Soc Issues. 2002; 58(3): 517-534. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00274
Barnes ME, Caprino K. Analyzing service-learning reflections through Fink’s Taxonomy. Teaching in Higher Education. 2016; 21(5): 557-575. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1160221
Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relation-ship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(6): 586-592. doi: 10.1037/0278-
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Social Behavior Research and Practice (SBRP) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.