VO2 Kinetics during Different Forms of Cycling Exercise on Land and in Water

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Matthias Fenzl
  • Klaus Karner-Rezek
  • Christian Schlegel
  • Joeri Gredig
  • Beat Villiger

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/SEMOJ-1-110

Keywords:

Whole body ergometry, VO2 kinetics, Aquatic exercise

Abstract

Background: It is generally assumed that the physical properties of water improve aerobic me-tabolism by O2 utilization of the working muscle particular if a great muscle mass is recruited. This study investigated the changes in VO2 (VO2-work rate relationship; ∆VO2/∆WR) during increasing work rates in different exercise conditions in water immersed exercise and on land based exercise.

Methods: In order to identify possible differences in VO2 required for a given work rate twelve trained cyclists performed four incremental exercise tests. The tests comprised whole body work and leg work, both in water and on land and were conducted on the same, electromagnetically braked whole body ergometer.

Results: The ∆VO2/∆WR curves were found to be similar in the four exercise conditions reach-ing from 11.9 to 12.4 ml·W-1 during water immersed exercise and 12.6 to 12.7 ml·W-1 dur-ing land based exercise respectively. When coupling arms with leg exercise the ∆VO2/∆WR curves shift upwards at similar work rates indicating a higher oxygen demand for an enlarged muscle mass. The extra O2 cost (∆VO2)for recruited arms was lower in water immersed exercise compared to land based exercise (0.057±0.072 l ·min-1 and 0.367 1±0.057·min-1, respectively; p=.000). Differences exist in the rate of performing physical work above ventilatory threshold two. Work load values attained on land based exercise surpass that of water immersed exercise (204.2 watts vs. 154.0 watts for whole body work and 227.1 watts vs. 150.0 watts for leg work, respectively).

Conclusions: Differences in ∆VO2 ata given work rate are to be explained rather from a biome-chanical point of view. More likely ∆VO2 in water seems to be influenced by both familiarity of the task and fitness level. Exercise intensity in water need to be selected at lower levels than on land.

References

Eston R, Brodie D. Responses to arm and leg ergometry. Br J Sports Med; 1986; 20: 4-6.

Gleser MA, Horstman DH, Mello RP. The effect on VO max of adding arm work to maximal leg work. Med Sci Sports; 1974; 6(2): 104-107.

Gutin B, Ang KE, Torrey K. Cardiorespiratory and subjective responses to incremental and constant load ergometry with arms and legs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69: 510-513.

Hoffmann M, Kassay K, Zeni A, Clifford P. Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exer-cise? Eur J Appl Physiol.1996; 74: 541-547.

Mayo JJ, Kravitz L, Wongsathikun J. Detecting the onset of added cardiovascular strain during combined arm and leg exer-cise. JEPonline. 2001; 4(3): 53-60.

Secher NH, Clausen JP, Klausen K, Noer I, Trap-Jensen J. Central and regional circulatory effects of adding arm exercise to leg exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1977; 100(3): 288-297. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1977.tb05952.x

Bergh U, Kanstrup IL, Ekblom B. Maximal oxygen uptake during exercise with various combinations of arm and leg work. J Appl Physiol. 1976; 41(2): 191-196.

Stenberg J, Astrand PO, Ekblom B, Royce, Saltin B. Hemody-namic response to work with different muscle groups, sitting and supine. J Physiol. 1967; 22: 61-70.

Reybrouck T, Heigenhauser GF, Faulkner JA. Limitations to maximum oxygen uptake in arm, leg, and combined arm-leg er-gometry. J Appl Physiol. 1975; 38(5): 774-779

Toner M, Sawka M, Levine L, Pandolf K. Cardiorespiratory responses to exercise distributed between the upper and lower body. J Appl Physiol. 1983; 54: 1403-1407.

Billat VL, Hamard L, Bocquet V, Demarie S, Beroni M, Pe-tit B, Koralsztein JP. Influence of light additional arm cranking exercise on the kinetics of VO in severe cycling exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21: 344–350.

Calbet JAL, Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Saltin B. Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Phy-siol. 2005; 289: R1448–R1458.

Secher NH, Voliantis S. Are the arms and legs in competition for cardiac output? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1797-1803.

Calbet JA, Gonzalez-Alonso J, Helge JW, Søndergaard H, Munch-Andersen T, Boushel R, Saltin B. Cardiac output and leg and arm blood flow during incremental exercise to exhaustion on the cycle ergometer. J Appl Physiol. 2007; 103: 969-978. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01281.2006

Christie JL, Sheldahl LM, Tristani FE, Wann LS, Sagar KB, Levandoski LG, Ptacin MJ, Sobocinski KA, Morris RD. Cardio-vascular regulation during head-out water immersion exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1990; 69: 657-664.

Sheldahl LM, Wann LS, Clifford PS, Tristani FE, Wolf LG, Kalbfleisch JH. Effect of central hypervolemia on cardiac per-formance during exercise. J Appl Physiol: Respirat Environ Ex-ercise Physiol. 1984; 57: 1662-1667.

Park KS, Choi JK, Park YS. Cardiovascular regulation dur-ing water immersion. Appl Human Sci.1999; 18: 233-241. doi: 10.2114/jpa.18.233

MacDonals MJ, Shoemaker JK, Tschakovsky ME, Hugh-son RL. Alveolar oxygen uptake and femoral artery blood flow dynamics in upright and supine leg exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1988; 85: 1622-1628.

Ferreira LF, McDonough P, Behnke BJ, Musch TI, Poole DC. Blood flow and O extraction as a function of O uptake in muscles composes different fiber types. Respir Physiol Neuro-biol. 2006 ; 153: 237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.11.004

Howley ET, Bassett DR, Welch HG. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27/9: 1292-1301.

Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue D. Principles of exercise tes-ting and interpretation. Philadelphia USA: Williams and Wilk-ings; 2005.

Robergs RA, Dwyer D, Astorino T. Recommendations for improved data processing from expired gas analysis indirect cal-orimetry. Sports Med. 2010; 40: 95-111. doi: 10.2165/11319670- 000000000-00000

Kang J, Hoffman JR, Wendell M, Walker H, Hebert M. Ef-fect of contraction frequency on energy expenditure and sub-strate utilisation during upper and lower body exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2004; 38: 31-35. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002121

Sawka MN. Physiology of upper body exercise. In: Pandolf KB, ed. Exercise and sports science. New York, NY, USA: Mac-millan; 1986: 175-211.

Van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Rosdahl H, Holmberg HC, Saltin B, Calbet JA. Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinet-ics during exercise. Am J Physiol Endodrinol Metab. 2003; 284: E193-E205. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00273.2002

Jensen-Urstad M, Ahlborg G, Sahlin K. High lactate and NH release during arm vs leg exercise is not due to beta-adre-noceptor stimulation. J Appl Physiol. 1993; 74: 2860-2867.

Koppo K, Bouckaert J. Prior arm exercise speeds the VO kinetics during arm exercise above the heart level. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2005; 37(4): 613-619.

Miller TL, Mattacola CG, Santiago MC. Influence of varied, controlled distances from the crank axis on peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry. J Exerc Physiol. 2004; 7(3): 61-67.

Rosenmeier JB, Yegutkin GG, González-Alonso J. Activa-tion of ATP/UTP-selective receptors increases blood flow and blunts sympathetic vasoconstriction in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2008; 15(586): 4993-5002. doi: 10.1113/jphysi-ol.2008.155432

Clifford PS, Hellsten Y. Vasodilatory mechanisms in con-tracting skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2004; 97: 393-403. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00179.2004

Volianitis S, Krustrup P, Dawson E, Secher NH. Blood flow and oxygenation on the transition from arm to combined arm and leg exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 2003; 547: 641-648. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.034496

Gerbes AL, Arendt RM, Schnizer W, Silz S, Jüngst D, Zähringer J, Paumgartner G. Regulation of atrial natriuretic fac-tor release in man: effect of water immersion. Klin Wschr. 1986; 64: 666-667.

Connelly TP, Sheldahl LM, Tristani FE, Levandoski SG, Kalkhoff RK, Hoffman MD, Kalbfleisch JH. Effect of increased central blood volume with water immersion on plasma catechol-amines during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1990; 69: 651-656.

Wiesner S, Birkenfeld AL, Engeli S, Haufe S, Brechtel L, Wein J, Hermsdorf M, Karnahl B, Berlan M, Lafontan M, Seep F., Luft FC, Jordan J. Neurohumoral and metabolic response to exercise in water. Horm Metab Res. 2010; 42: 334-339. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248250

Balldin UI, Lundgren CE, Lundvall J, Mellander S. Changes in the elimination of 133 xenon from the anterior tibial muscle in man induced by immersion in water and by shifts in body posi-tion. Aerosp Med. 1971; 42(5): 489-493.

Hajduczok G, Miki K, Claybaugh JR, Hong SK, Krasney JA. Regional circulatory responses to head-out water immersion in conscious dogs. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, In-tegrative and Comparative Physiology. 1987; 253: R254-R263.

Fisher JP, White MJ. Muscle afferent contributions to the cardiovascular response to isometric exercise. Exp Physiol. 2004; 89: 639-646.

Fenzl M, Schnizer W, Hartmann B, Villiger B, Knüsel O. Maximal oxygen uptake, maximal aerobic capacity, deep water running, swimming, water cycling, water exercise. Schweiz Z Sportmed. 2005; 53/4: 172-178.

Brink-Elfegoun T, Kaijser L, Gustafsson T, Ekblom B. Max-imal oxygen uptake is not limited by a central nervous system governor. J Appl Physiol. 2007; 102: 781-786. doi: 10.1152/jap-plphysiol.00566.2006

Downloads

Published

2015-07-17

How to Cite

Matthias Fenzl, Klaus Karner-Rezek, Christian Schlegel, Joeri Gredig, & Beat Villiger. (2015). VO2 Kinetics during Different Forms of Cycling Exercise on Land and in Water. Sports and Exercise Medicine , 1(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.17140/SEMOJ-1-110