A Retrospective and Comparative Analysis of the Physical Fitness of Custody Assistant Classes Prior to Academy Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SEMOJ-4-159Keywords:
Aerobic capacity, Anaerobic endurance, Correctional officers, Police, Strength endurance, TacticalAbstract
Background
Within a law enforcement agency (LEA), custody assistants (CAs) are responsible for upholding proper safety and security inside correctional facilities. However, unlike other law enforcement positions, CAs may not be subjected to fitness testing prior to matriculation. If there are differences in fitness between recruits across different classes, this could influence training adaptations following academy.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical fitness of CAs across three different academy classes.
Methods
A retrospective examination of performance data was conducted on 108 CAs from three classes (Class 1: males=29, females=11; Class 2: males=22, females=16; Class 3: males=18, females=12). The fitness tests encompassed: number of push-ups and sit-ups in 60 seconds; 201-meter (m) and 2.4-kilometer (km) run times; and estimated maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) derived from the 2.4-km run. To compare males and females from the classes (the sexes were analyzed separately), a one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc was utilized (p<0.05). Effect sizes (d) were also calculated.
Results
Class 2 males executed significantly more sit-ups than those from Class 3. There were moderate effects for the greater number of
push-ups completed by Class 2 compared to Class 3, and the faster 201-m run for Class 3 compared to Class 2 (d=0.60-1.00). There
were no significant between-class differences for the females, but moderate effects for the greater sit-ups and estimated VO2max
for Class 1 compared to Class 3 (d=0.64-0.76).
Conclusion
Even without physical testing prior to academy, the CA classes from this LEA seemed to be relatively similar in fitness. However,
physical training instructors should acknowledge that there may be select variances between certain classes (e.g. abdominal strength
measured by sit-ups; anaerobic endurance measured by the 201-m run). Instructors should utilize appropriate assessments to characterize fitness of their recruits, and where possible, tailor training accordingly.
References
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Custody Assistant, Sheriff. Website. https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/ lacounty/jobs/1635706/custody-assistant-sheriff. Accessed Au-gust 2, 2017.
Jamnik VK, Thomas SG, Burr JF, Gledhill N. Construction, vali-dation, and derivation of performance standards for a fitness test for correctional officer applicants. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010; 35(1): 59-70. doi: 10.1139/H09-122
Jamnik VK, Thomas SG, Shaw JA, Gledhill N. Identification and characterization of the critical physically demanding tasks encoun-tered by correctional officers. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010; 35(1): 45-58. doi: 10.1139/H09-121
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. What are the selec-tion requirements for custody assistant (CA)? Website. http://las-Original Research | Volume 4 | Number 2 | Lockie RG, et al dcareers.org/sp_faq/selection-requirements-custody-assistantca/. Accessed July 20, 2017.
Birzer ML, Craig DE. Gender differences in police physi-cal ability test performance. Am J Police. 1996; 15(2): 93-108. doi: 10.1108/07358549610122494
Cocke C, Dawes J, Orr RM. The use of 2 conditioning pro-grams and the fitness characteristics of police academy cadets. J Athl Train. 2016; 51(11): 887-896. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.8.06
Crawley AA, Sherman RA, Crawley WR, Cosio-Lima LM. Physi-cal fitness of police academy cadets: Baseline characteristics and changes during a 16-week academy. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(5): 1416-1424. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001229
Orr RM, Ford K, Stierli M. Implementation of an ability-based training program in police force recruits. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(10): 2781-2787. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000898
Cesario KA, Moreno MR, Bloodgood AM, Dulla JM, Lockie RG. Heart rate responses of a custody assistant class to a forma-tion run during academy training. Southwest American College of Sports Medicine's 37th Annual Meeting; Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017 October 20-21.
Moreno MR, Cesario KA, Bloodgood AM, Dulla JM, Lock-ie RG. Heart rate response of a custody assistant class to circuit training during the academy period. Southwest American College of Sports Medicine's 37th Annual Meeting; October 20-21; Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017.
Dawes JJ, Orr RM, Flores RR, et al. A physical fitness profile of state highway patrol officers by gender and age. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017; 29. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0173-0
Lockie RG, Dawes JJ, Kornhauser CL, Holmes RJ. A cross-sectional and retrospective cohort analysis of the effects of age on flexibility, strength endurance, lower-body power, and aerobic fitness in law enforcement officers. J Strength Cond Res. In press. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001937
Boyce RW, Jones GR, Schendt KE, Lloyd CL, Boone EL. Lon-gitudinal changes in strength of police officers with gender com-parisons. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(8): 2411-2418. doi: 10.1519/ JSC.0b013e3181bac2ab
Kaufman KR, Brodine S, Shaffer R. Military training-related in-juries: Surveillance, research, and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18(3, Supplement 1): 54-63.
Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(5): 273-280. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788
Knapik J, Ang P, Reynolds K, Jones B. Physical fitness, age, and injury incidence in infantry soldiers. J Occup Med. 1993; 35(6): 598-603.
Knapik JJ, Sharp MA, Canham-Chervak M, et al. Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic com-bat training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(6): 946-954.
Orr R, Moorby GM. The physical conditioning optimisation project - a physical conditioning continuum review of the Army Recruit Training Course. In: Department of Defence. editor. Canberra, Australia; 2006.
Rhea MR. Needs analysis and program design for po-lice officers. Strength Cond J. 2015; 37(4): 30-34. doi: 10.1519/ SSC.0000000000000082
Dawes JJ, Orr RM, Brandt BL, Conroy RL, Pope R. The effect of age on push-up performance amongst male law enforcement officers. J Aust Strength Cond. 2016; 24(4): 23-27.
Dawes JJ, Orr RM, Siekaniec CL, Vanderwoude AA, Pope R. Associations between anthropometric characteristics and physical performance in male law enforcement officers: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016; 28(26): doi: 10.1186/ s40557-40016-40112-40555
Orr R, Dawes JJ, Pope R, Terry J. Assessing differences in an-thropometric and fitness characteristics between police academy cadets and incumbent officers. J Strength Cond Res. In press. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002328
Considine W, Misner JE, Boileau RA, et al. Developing a physi-cal performance test battery for screening Chicago fire fighter ap-plicants. Public Pers Manage. 1976; 5(1): 7-14.
Semenick D. Anaerobic testing: Practical applications. Strength Cond J. 1984; 6(5): 45; 70-73. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Hetzler RK, Stickley CD, Lundquist KM, Kimura IF. Reliability and accuracy of handheld stopwatches compared with electronic timing in measuring sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22(6): 1969-1976. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f36c
George JD, Vehrs PR, Allsen PE, Fellingham GW, Fisher AG. VO estimation from a submaximal 1-mile track jog for fit col-lege-age individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25(3): 401-406.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
Hopkins WG. How to interpret changes in an athletic perfor-mance test. Sportscience. 2004; 81-87.
Lockie RG, Davis DL, Birmingham-Babauta SA, et al. Physi-ological characteristics of incoming freshmen field players in a men’s Division I collegiate soccer team. Sports. 2016; 4(2): doi: 10.3390/sports4020034
Orr RM, Pope R. Optimizing the physical training of mili-tary trainees. Strength Cond J. 2015; 37(4): 53-59. doi: 10.1519/ SSC.0000000000000148
Zemke B, Wright G. The use of strongman type implements and training to increase sport performance in collegiate athletes. Strength Cond J. 2011; 33(4): 1-7. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e3182221f96
Sell K, Taveras K, Ghigiarelli J. Sandbag training: A sample 4-Week training program. Strength Cond J. 2011; 33(4): 88-96. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e318216b587
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Sports and Exercise Medicine (SEM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
