Comparison of Tonsillectomy Techniques and their Histopathological Healing Patterns

Authors

  • Berk Gurpinar Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ziya Salturk Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/OTLOJ-3-142

Keywords:

Tonsillectomy, Sutter, PlasmaKnife, Coblator, Thermal welding

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to identify the tonsillectomy method offering the lowest post-opera-tive morbidity, complications and the best healing pattern.
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and eighty adult male patients complaining of recurrent tonsillitis were enrolled in the study. All the participants were randomly assigned to one of the techniques, including cold knife tonsillectomy (CLST, n=30), electrocautery (ELCTR, n=30), Sutter radiofrequency tonsillectomy (SRF, n=30), plasmacision (PLCS, n=30), coblation (CBL, n=30) and thermal welding (THRWL, n=30). The age of the patient, operative time, bleeding control time, need for additional cautery, amount of blood loss, the degree of difficulty of the technique, post-operative pain in the 1st, 3rd and the 5th days and post-operative complications were recorded.
Results: The SRF group had the least operative time between 3 to 20 minutes (average 10.4±4.28 min. The longest operative time with THRWL ranged between 17-28 minutes (average 22.66 ±4.36 min.) (p<0.00001). CLST showed the least, while PLCS was characterised with the most pain in the 3rd post-operative day (p=0.0026). On the 5th day, the pain scores were similar to that of the 3rd day (p=0.0037). Histopathologically, necrosis was least in CBL and most in PLCS (p<0.00001). Vascular proliferation was least in SRF and most in CBL (p<0.00001). Lymphocyte and histocyte migration was least in the CBL and most in the PLCS (p<0.00001).
Conclusion: Although, inexpensive, CLST is accompanied by a significant amount of intra-operative blood loss and operative time. SRF, CBL and THRWL techniques seemed to have reasonable post-operative pain, lower amounts of blood loss and lower tissue reactions.

References

Silveira H, Soares JS, Lima HA. Tonsillectomy: Cold dissec-tion versus bipolar electrodissection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolar-yngol. 2003; 67(4): 345-351. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(02)0039 9-3

Clenney T, Schroeder A, Bondy P, et al. Post-operative pain after adult tonsillectomy with plasmaknife compared to mono-polar electrocautery. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121(7): 1416-1421. doi: 10.1002/lary.21806

Noordzij JP, Affleck BD. Coblation versus unipolar electro-cautery tonsillectomy: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116(8): 1303-1309. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000225944.00189.e9

Sultana J, Molla MR, Kamal M, et al. Histological differen-ces in wound healing in maxillofacial region in patients with or without risk factors. Bangladesh J Pathol. 2009; 24(1): 3-8. doi: 10.3329/bjpath.v24i1.2874

Gal P, Kilik R, Mokry M, et al. Simple methof of open skin wound healing model in corticosteroid-treated and diabetic rats: Standardization of semi-quantitative and quantitative histologi-cal assessements. Vet Med. 2008; 53: 652-659.

Wilson YL, Mere DM, Moscatello AL. Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques. A prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Laryngoscope. 2009; 119(1): 162- 170. doi: 10.1002/lary.20024

Kirazli T, Bilgen C, Midilli R, et al. Bipolar electrodissecti-on tonsillectomy in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 716-718. doi: 10.1007/s00405-004-0774-4

Salonen A, Kokki H, Nuutinen J. Recovery after tonsillec-tomy in adults: A three-week follow-up study. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112(1): 94-98. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200201000-00017

Sutters KA, Miaskowski C, Holdridge-Zeuner D, et al. A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of scheduled dosing of acetaminophen and hydrocodone for the management of posto-perative pain in children after tonsillectomy. Clin J Pain. 2010; 26(2): 95-103. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b85f98

Winfuhr JP, Chen YS. Incidence of post-tonsillectomy he-morrhage in children and adults: A study of 4,848 patients. Ear Nose Throat J. 2002; 81(9): 626-628.

Sibbons PD, Southgate A. Comparison of wound-healing and tissue effects using the Gyrus PlasmaKnife with monopolar, coblation, and harmonic scalpel methodologies. Comp Clin Pat-hol. 2006; 15: 17-26. doi: 10.1007/s00580-005-0588-9

Walker P, Gillies D. Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage rates: Are they technique-dependent? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 136: 831-836.

Karatzias GT, Lachanas VA, Sandris VG. Thermal welding versus bipolar tonsillectomy: A comparative study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134(6): 975-978. doi: 10.1016/j.otoh-ns.2006.03.003

Carroll T, Ladner K, Meyers AD. Alternative surgical disse-ction techniques. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005; 38(2): 397- 411. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2004.10.001

Stephens J, Singh A, Hughes J, Goswamic T, Ghufoorc K, Sandhua G. A prospective multi-centre randomised cont-rolled trial comparing PlasmaKnife with bipolar dissection tonsillectomy: Evaluating an emerging technology. Int J Pe-diatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73: 597-601 18. doi: 10.1016/j. ijporl.2008.12.008

Pang KP, Siow JKJ. Sutter bipolar radiofrequency volu-metric tissue reduction of palate for snoring and mild obstruc-tive sleep apnoea: Is one treatment adequate? J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(7): 750-754. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109004253

Wexler DB. Recovery after tonsillectomy: Electrodissection vs. sharp dissection techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996; 114(4): 576-581. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989670249-8

Back L, Paloheimo M, Ylikoski J. Traditional tonsillectomy compared with bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation tonsille-ctomy in adults. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127: 1106-1112. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.9.1106

Downloads

Published

2017-08-16

How to Cite

Berk Gurpinar, & Ziya Salturk. (2017). Comparison of Tonsillectomy Techniques and their Histopathological Healing Patterns. Otolaryngology, 3(3), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.17140/OTLOJ-3-142

Most read articles by the same author(s)