Importance of Keros Classification in Surgery

Authors

  • Hüseyin Sarı Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Güven Yıldırım Department of Otolaryngology, Giresun University ENT Clinic, Giresun, Turkey
  • Suzan Deniz Önol Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital Radiology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Erdi Ozdemır Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ahmet Arslanoglu Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Berk Gurpınar Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Tolgar Lütfi Kumral Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Yavuz Uyar Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ziya Salturk Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/OTLOJ-3-143

Keywords:

Keros classification, Ethmoid roof, Paranasal Sinus, Cribriform plate

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between the cribriform plate and the uncinate process may be elaborated with the help of the Keros classification. The observations were analysed using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Additionally, the relationship between the superior attachment of the uncinate process, the existence of concha bullosa, and the different types of ethmoid roofs were examined.
Methods: Five-hundred and sixteen subjects complaining of sinonasal disorders between 2015 and 2016 were enrolled retrospectively at the Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology. HRCT scans of 1-mm sections were obtained. Keros classification was used for the measurement of the depth of the olfactory fossa as follows: Keros I: 1-3 mm, Keros II: 3-7 mm, and Keros III: 7-16 mm.
Results: Fifty-one point nine percentage of cases were of Keros type II, 27.7% of type III, and 20.3% of type I. In 82.4% of the reported cases, the uncinate process was attached to the lamina papyraceae, in 11% of the cases it was attached to the middle nasal turbinate, and in 6.4% cases to the skull base. A concha bullosa was observed in the right nasal cavity in 13.8% of the cases, in the left nasal cavity in 11% of the cases, and bilaterally in 16.3% of the cases. Variances observed in the Keros types were not statistically significant with respect to sex (p>0.05). Concha bullosa was significantly more frequently seen in females (53.1%) relative to males (p=0.001). Conclusion: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is the primary mode of treatment for chronic sinus diseases. In this procedure, a proper assessment of the vital structures is very important to avoid further complications. In the present study, it has been suggested that determining the depth of the ethmoid roof is necessary to avoid injuring the bony lamella, which can lead to cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

References

Zacharek MA, Han JK, Allen R, et al. Sagital and coronal dimensions of the ethmoid roof: A radioanatomic study. Am J Rhinol. 2005; 19: 348-352.

Luong A, Marple BF. Sinus surgery: Indications and tech-niques. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006; 30: 217-222.

Ohnishi T, Tachibana T, Kaneko Y, Esaki S. High-risk areas in endoscopic sinus surgery and prevention of complications. Laryngoscope. 1993; 103: 1181-1185. doi: 10.1288/00005537- 199310000-00020

Leunig A, Betz CS, Sommer B, Sommer F. Anatomic varia-tions of the sinuses; multiplanar CT-analysis in 641 patients. Laryngorhinootologie. 2008; 87: 482-489. doi: 10.1055/s-2007- 995572

Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962; 41: 809-813.

Zeinreich SJ. Paranasal sinus imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 103: 868-869. doi: 10.1177/01945998901030S505

Messerklinger W. On the drainage of the frontal sinus of man. Acta Otolaryngol. 1967; 63: 176-181. doi: 10.3109/00016 486709128748

Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery-concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part 1. Anatomik and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 94(2): 143-147. doi: 10.1177/019459988609400202

McMains KC. Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 247-251. doi: 10.1097/ MOO.0b013e3282fdccad

Ulualp SO. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: Appropriate management of complications. Curr Opin Oto-laryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 252-259. doi: 10.1097/ MOO.0b013e3282fdc3b2

Erdogan S, Keskin G, Topdag M, Ozturk M, Sari F, Mutlu F. Ethmoid roof radiology; analysis of lateral lamel-la of cribriform plate. Otolaryngol Pol. 2015; 69: 53-57. doi: 10.5604/00306657.1184543

Stammberger H, Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of Messerklinger tech-nique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 19990: 247(2): 63-76.

Sheng YC, Chih JY, Chiao HL, et al. The association of su-perior attachment of uncinate process with pneumatization of middle turbinate: A computed tomographic analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274: 1905-1910. doi: 10.1007/s00405- 016-4441-3

Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991; 101: 56-64. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010

Perez-Piñas I, Sabaté J, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Jiménez-Castellanos J. Anatomical variations in the human pa-ranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat. 2000; 197: 221-227. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720221.x

Unlu HH, Akyar S, Caylan R, Nalça Y. Concha bullosa. J Otolaryngol. 1994; 23: 23-27.

Maru YK, Gupta Y. Concha bullosa: Frequency and appear-ances on sinonasal CT. Indian. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 52: 40-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02996431

Guldner C, Zimmermann AP, Diogo J, Werner JA, Tey-moortash A. Age-dependent differences of the anterior skull base. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 76(6): 822-828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.050

Elwany S, Medanni A, Eid M, Aly A, El-Daly A, Ammar SR. Radiological observations on the olfactory fossa and ethmoid roof. J Laryngol Otol. 2010; 124: 1251-1256. doi: 10.1017/ S0022215110001313

Ercan I, Cakir BO, Sayin I, Başak M, Turgut S. Relationship between the superior attachment type of uncinate process and presence of agger nasi cell: A computer-assisted anatomic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134: 1010-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.021

Srivastava M, Tyag M. Role of Anatomic variations of uncinate process in frontal sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68(4): 441-444. doi: 10.1007/s12070-015- 0932-6

Tuli IP, Sengupta S, Munjal S, Kesari SP, Chakraborty S. Anatomical variations of uncinate process observed in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(2): 157-161. doi: 10.1007/s12070-012-0612-8

Downloads

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

Hüseyin Sarı, Güven Yıldırım, Suzan Deniz Önol, Erdi Ozdemır, Ahmet Arslanoglu, Berk Gurpınar, … Ziya Salturk. (2017). Importance of Keros Classification in Surgery. Otolaryngology, 3(3), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.17140/OTLOJ-3-143

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)