Features of Safe and Efficient Treatment Approaches for New Proximal Humeral Fracture-Dislocations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/ortoj.2025.v10.i01.pp23-28.744Keywords:
Trauma, Fracture, Shoulder joint, Fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerusAbstract
Aim
The study was aimed to assess the results of treatment for fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus (PH) within different
time frames for optimizing treatment tactics.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical outcomes of 25 patients with fracture-dislocations of the PH (15 patients were
analyzed for short- and medium-term results, and 10 – for long-term results). The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 9-years. All
patients underwent: clinical examination, constant score assessment and shoulder X-ray examination. Clinical, radiological and
statistical methods were used for analysis.
Results
Assessment of the degree of initial displacement of tubercles and its impact on the results of treatment showed that significantly
better results were obtained in case of displacement no more than 10 mm (p=0.041). Patients with displacement no more than
10 mm had an average score of 68.0±16.1 points (Mean=69.5), while those with displacement of the tubercle(s) exceeding 10
mm had an average score of 49.5±19.5 points (Mean=44). Analysis of the results of treatment showed that the delay in restoring
normal anatomy of the PH or avoiding surgical interventions at all led to functional disorders of the shoulder joint. It was also
demonstrated that neither patients, nor doctors were satisfied with the outcomes of the unipolar shoulder replacement (USR).
Based on the results of the study, we proposed an algorithm for determining the tactics of surgical treatment in cases when a
fracture-dislocation of the PH with complete dislocation of the fragment involving the articular surface of the humeral head is
diagnosed.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated some factors affecting the outcomes of treatment for fracture-dislocations of the PH. Current
approaches for endoprosthesis replacement in these cases remain debatable and require further investigation.
References
Krasnov AF. Vyvihiplecha [Dislocations of the shoulder]. Mos-cow: Medicine. 1982; 160.
Grumeza MA, Startsun VK. Perelomo-vyvihikrupnyhseg-mentovprimnozhestvennyhisochetannyhpovrezhdenijah [Frac-tures-dislocations of large segments in multiple and combined injuries]. In: Korljetjanu MA, ed. Diagnostikailecheniebol’nyh s mnozhestvennojisochetannojtravmoj [Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Multiple and Combined Trauma] [In: Russian]. Kishinev, Moldova: Shtiintsa; 1988: 3942.
Bitchuk DD, Prozorovsky DV. Lechenie perelomov yvi hov proksimal’ no goot delapl eche vojkosti [Treatment of fracture-dis-locations of the proximal humerus]. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics. 1997; 3: 98-99.
Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R, Tavy DL. Nerve lesions in prox-imal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2001; 10(5): 421-427. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.118002
Hems TEJ, Mahmood F. Injuries of the terminal branches of the infraclavicular brachial plexus: Patterns of injury, manage-ment and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(6): 799-804. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X. 94B6.28286
Gasbarro G, Crasto JA, Rocha J, Henry S, Kano D, Tarkin IS. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for geriatric proximal humerus fracture dislocation with concomitant nerve injury. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019; 10: 2151459319855318. doi: 10.1177/2151459319855318
Mehlhorn AT, Schmal H, Sudkamp NP. Clinical evaluation of a new custom offset shoulder prosthesis for treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006; 72(4): 387-394.
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of hu-meral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(4): 427-433. doi: 10.1016/ S1058274604000795
Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, et al. Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review of 92 studies including 4,500 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(1): 54-59. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000229
Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6): Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 848-855. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14577
Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Hem-iarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(7): 1025-1033. doi: 10.1016/j. jse.2011.04.016
Teuling JWAM, Pauwels BS, Janssen L, et al. The influence of bone mineral density and cortical index on the complexity of frac-tures of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint Res. 2017; 6(10): 584-589. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0080
Kontakis G, Koutras C, Tosounidis T, Giannoudis P. Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(11): 1407-1413. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X. 90B11.21070
Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treat-ment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(6): 1090-1103.
Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zucker-man JD. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(3): 159-164. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Orthopedics Research and Traumatology (ORT) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
