Effects of a Periodized Training Program and a Traditional Military Training Program on Functional Movement and Y-Balance Tests in ROTC Cadets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SEMOJ-3-147Keywords:
Military training, Periodized training, FMS, YBTAbstract
Background: Functional movement screening (FMS) and Y-balance test (YBT) are assessment procedures used to examine the ‘quality’ of movement patterns and identify individuals that might have specific limitations or asymmetries. Low FMS and YBT scores have been linked with a higher risk of injury among athletic populations. Since FMS and YBT are becoming more widely used screening tools, it is important to examine the various training programs that could improve FMS and YBT scores.
Purpose: This pilot study examined the effects of a 10-week periodized and traditional military training program on FMS, and upper and lower quadrant YBT scores of Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) Cadets.
Methods: Subjects consisted of 36 Army and Air Force ROTC cadets (male=24, female=12), Age 19.7(yrs)±5.96, Height (cm)=175.7±9.28, Weight(kg)=75.70±13.41. The periodized, intervention group (IG n=24) trained for 1 hour/day, 4 days/week and the control group (CG n=12) participated in traditional ROTC training protocol for 1 hour/day, 3 days/week. A 2×2 mixed factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean change values of the FMS, upper, and lower quadrant YBT scores for intervention and control groups.
Results: A significant interaction (p≤0.05) was observed for FMS scores. The control group had a much lower initial FMS score and demonstrated more improvement than the intervention group. Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in left side YBT upper (p=0.03) and lower (p=0.02) quadrant scores after 10-weeks of training.
Conclusions: Since FMS and YBT scores are being used more frequently as screening tools for risk of injury, it is important to study methods that will improve FMS and YBT scores in diverse athletic populations. This study found larger improvements in FMS scores in ROTC cadets participating in a traditional military training program compared to cadets participating in a periodized strength training program. Scores in the left side of the YBT upper and lower quadrants were improved in both groups suggesting multiple training programs can improve function in non-dominant sides or asymmetries. Future studies are warranted and should address certain limitations that this study encountered (sample size and length of training period). Further exploration of FMS and YBT scores and mechanisms of improvement in tactical athletic populations would be beneficial.
References
Song HS, Woo SS, So WY, Kim KJ, Lee J, Kim JY. Effects of a 16-week functional movement screen training program on strength and flexibility of elite high school baseball players. J Exerc Rehabil. 2014; 10(2): 124-130. doi: 10.12965/jer.140101
Del Veccchio FB, Gondim DF, Arruda AC. Functional move-ment screening performance of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu athletes from Brazil: Differences considering practice time and combat style. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(8): 2341-2347. doi: 10.1519/ JSC.0000000000001324
Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ, Kiesel KB. Upper Quarter Y Balance Test: Reliability and performance comparison between genders in active adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 26(11): 3043-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fdb
Smith CA, Chimera NJ, Warren M. Association of Y bal-ance test reach asymmetry and injury in division I athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 47(1): 136-141. doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0000000000000380
Coughlan GF, Fullam K, Delahunt E, Gissane C, Caulfield BM. A comparison between performance on selected direc-tions of the star excursion balance test and the Y balance test. J Athl Training. 2012; 47(4): 366-371. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050- 47.4.03
Schneiders AG, Davidsson A, Hormann E, Sullivan SJ. Func-tional movement screenTM normative values in a young, active population. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 6(2): 75-82.
Minick KI, Kiesel KB, Burton L, Taylor A, Plisky P, But-ler RJ. Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(2): 479-486. doi: 10.1519/ JSC.0b013e3181c09c04
Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight M. Can serious injury in profes-sional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement Screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 2(3): 147-158.
Chorba R, Chorba D, Bouillon L, Overmyer C, Landis J. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 5(2): 47-54.
Linek P, Saulicz E, Mysliwiec A, Wojtowicz M, Wolny T. The effect of specific sling exercises on the functional move-ment screen score in adolescent volleyball players: A pre-liminary study. J Hum Kinet. 2016; (54): 83-90. doi: 10.1515/ hukin-2016-0037
Stanek JM, Dodd DJ, Kelly AR, Wolfe AM, Swenson RA. Active duty firefighters can improve functional movement screen (FMS) scores following an 8-week individualized client workout program. Work. 2017; 56(2): 213-220. doi: 10.3233/ WOR-172493
Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 3 rd ed. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics; 2008.
O’Connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screening: Predicting injuries in officer candidates. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(12): 2224-2230. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d
Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, et al. The Functional Movement Screen: A reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42(6): 530-540. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3838
Butler RJ, Myers HS, Black D, et al. Bilateral differences in the upper quarter function of high school aged baseball and softball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(4): 518-524.
Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Explora-tion of the Y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7(2): 139-147.
Cohen, JW. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum associ-ates; 1988.
Chimera NJ, Smith CA, Warren M. Injury history, sex, and performance on the functonal movemen screen and Y balance test. J Athl Train. 2015; 50(5): 475-485. doi: 10.4085/1062- 6050-49.6.02
Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butelr R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off season intervention pro-gram in professional football players. Scand. J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21(2): 287-292. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01038.x
Bodden J, Needham R, Chockalingam N. The effect of an intervention program on functional movement screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes. J Strenght Cond Res. 2015; 29(1): 219-225. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a480bf
AFI 36-2905_Fitness Program. (2013). Air Force Instruction 36-2905. (Department of the Air Force). Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.afpc.af.mil/Por-tals/70/documents/Home/AF%20Fitness%20Program/AFI%20 36-2905_FITNESS%20PROGRAM.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2017.
Goss DL, Christopher GE, Faulk RT, Moore J. Functional training program bridges rehabilitation and return to duty. J Spec Oper Med. 2009; 9(2): 29-48. Web site. http://www.jsomonline. org/Publications/2009229Goss.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2017.
Cowen VS. Functional fitness improvements after a work-site-based yoga initiative. J Body Mov Ther. 2010; 14(1): 50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.02.006
Filipa A, Byrnes R, Paterno M, Myers GD, Hewett TE. Neu-romuscular training improves performance on the star excur-sion balance test in young female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40(9): 551-558. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3325
Hudson C, Garrison JC, Pollard K. Y-balance normative data for female collegiate volleyball players. Phys Ther Sport. 2016; 22: 61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.05.009
Borms D, Maenhout A, Cools AM. Upper Quadrant Field Tests and Isokinetic Upper Limb Strength in Overhead Athletes. J Athl Train. 2016; 51(10): 789-796. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050- 51.12.06
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Sports and Exercise Medicine (SEM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.