Reproductive Biotechnology Options for Improving Livestock Production: A Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/aftnsoj-6-164Keywords:
Artificial insemination, Estrus synchronization, Embryo transfer, Livestock, Reproductive biotechnologyAbstract
Reproductive biotechnology is one of the options which have a role in the improvement of livestock. It is a technology that improves livestock production by improving the reproductive insufficiency of the animal through different techniques. These are artificial insemination (AI), cloning, estrus synchronization, embryo transfer (ET), transgenesis and in vitro fertilization. These techniques are very important techniques to advance livestock production and to meet the people’s demands now-a-day. These reproductive biotechnologies have a dramatic effect on the world’s economy through the improvement of livestock genetics, pre-venting disease, facilitate transportation, keeping endangered animals and reducing economic loss. Artificial insemination in animals was originally developed to control the spread of disease, avoiding the transport of animals with potential pathogens to other animal units for mating and avoiding physical contact between individuals. The use of semen extenders containing antibiotics also helped to prevent the transmission of bacterial diseases. AI is broadly used in developing countries including Ethiopia. Even if reproductive biotechnologies are effective to change livestock production status of the countries, they are not applied routinely due to the presence of different challenges. Therefore, this review highlighted the major reproductive biotechnology options and their roles in the improvement of livestock production.
References
Madan ML. Animal biotechnology: applications and economic implications in developing countries. Rev Sci Tech. 2005; 24(1): 127-139
Rosegrant MW, Fernandez M, Sinha A, et al. Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST. Web site. https://cgspace.cgiar. org/handle/10568/37336?show=full. Accessed November 20, 2019
Gale HF, Ping T, Xianhong B, Huijun X. Commercialization of food consumption in rural China. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report 8. 2005. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.7256
Verma OP, Kumar R, Kumar A, Chand S. Assisted reproductive techniques in farm animal-from artificial insemination to nanobiotechnology. Veterinary World. 2012; 5(5): 301-310. doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2012.301-310
Holtz W. Recent developments in assisted reproduction in goats. Small Ruminant Research. 2005; 60(1-2): 95-110. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.032
Mapletoft R. History and perspectives on bovine embryo transfer. Anim Reprodu. 2013; 10(3): 168-173
Widayati DT. Embryo transfer as an assisted reproductive technology in farm animals. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2012; 6: 10-21. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1061796
Morrell J, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Practical applications of sperm selection techniques as a tool for improving reproductive efficiency. Vet Med Int. 2010; 2011: 1-9. doi: 10.4061/2011/894767
Garner D, Seidel JG. History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology. 2008; 69(7): 886-895. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.006
Moore K, Thatcher W. Major advances associated with reproduction in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89(4): 1254-1266. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72194-4
Olatunji O. Biotechnology and industries in Nigeria. Paper presented at: Proceeding 20th Annual National Conference of Biotechnology Society of Nigeria; 2007; Abakaliki, Nigeria
Choudhary K, Kavya K, Jerome A, Sharma R. Advances in reproductive biotechnologies. Veterinary World. 2016; 9(4): 388- 395. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.388-395
Leitman N, Busch D, Mallory D, et al. Comparison of longterm CIDR-based protocols to synchronize estrus in beef heifers. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009; 114(4): 345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.10.014
Getachew BF. Use of biotechnology in livestock production and productivites: A review. International Journal of Research Granthaalayah. 2016; 4(6): 100-109. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.56631
Lamb C. What are the long-term impacts of estrus synchronization and artificial insemination? Web site. http://nwdistrict. ifas.ufl.edu/phag/2015/10/09/what-are-the-long-term-impacts-of-estrus-synchronization-and-artificial-insemination/. Accessed November 20, 2019
Thibier M. The zootechnical applications of biotechnology in animal reproduction: current methods and perspectives. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2005; 45(3): 235-242. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2005016
Long JA. Reproductive biotechnology and gene mapping: Tools for conserving rare breeds of livestock. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008; 43: 83-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01146.x
Holm D, Thompson P, Irons P. The economic effects of an estrus synchronization protocol using prostaglandin in beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2008; 70(9): 1507-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.098
Manafi M. Artificial insemination in farm animals. In: Theriogenology. London, UK: IntechOpen Publisher; 2011
Johnson LA, Rath D, Vazquez JM, Maxwell WM, Dobrinsky JR. Preselection of sex of offspring in swine for production: Current status of the process and its application. Theriogenology. 2005; 63(2): 615-624. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.035
Maquivar M, Verduzco A, Galina C, et al. Relationship among follicular growth, oestrus, time of ovulation, endogenous estradiol 17β and luteinizing hormone in Bos indicus cows after a synchronization program. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007; 42(6): 571-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00821.x
Peter JC. Applied reproductive strategies in beef cattle. Paper presented at: Proceedings, semen evaluation; 2004; North Platte, Nebraska
Anel L, Kaabi M, Abroug B, et al. Factors influencing the success of vaginal and laparoscopic artificial insemination in churra ewes: A field assay. Theriogenology. 2005; 63(4): 1235-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.001
De Jong E, Vanderhaeghe C, Beek J, et al. Ultrasonography of the ovaries in the sow: a helpful tool to determine the time of insemination. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 2009; 78: 276-281. Adv Food Technol Nutr Sci Open J. 2020; 6(1): 13-20. doi: 10.17140/AFTNSOJ-6-164
Ball PJ, Peters AR. Reproduction in Cattle. 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: United Kingdom Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2004
Vishwanath R. Artificial insemination: The state of the art. Theriogenology. 2003; 59(2): 571-584. doi: 10.1016/S0093- 691X(02)01241-4
Foote R. Within-herd use of boar semen at 5 °C, with a note on electronic monitoring of oestrus. Reprod Domest Anim. 2002; 37(1): 61-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00328.x
Rodriguez-Martinez H, Hultgren J, Båge R, et al. Reproductive performance in high-producing dairy cows: Can we sustain it under current practice. IVIS Reviews in Veterinary Medicine. 2008; 1(108): 1-23
Lucy M, McDougall S, Nation D. The use of hormonal treatments to improve the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows in feedlot or pasture-based management systems. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004; 82: 495-512. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.004
Paul AK, Yoisungnern T, Bunaparte N. Hormonal treatment and estrus synchronization in cows: A mini-review. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2015; 2(1): 10-17. doi: 10.5455/javar.2015.b45
Worku A. Assessment of breeding practices and evaluation of Mass Oestrus Syncronization and Mass Insemination Techniques in Dairy Cattle in West Shoa Zone, [master’s thesis]. Dire Dawa, Ethiopia: Haramaya University; 2015
Noseir WM. Ovarian follicular activity and hormonal profile during estrous cycle in cows: The development of 2 versus 3 waves. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003; 1(1): 50. doi: 10.1186/1477- 7827-1-50
Blezinger SB. Estrous synchronization a valuable tool in management of cows and heifers. Cattle Today, INC. 2000
Cowan T, Becker GS. Biotechnology in animal agriculture: Status and current issues. Congressional Research Service. Web site. https://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/RL33334.pdf. 2010. Accessed November 2, 2019
Stroud B, International Embryo Transfer Society’s (IETS). Statistics and data retrieval committee report. Embryo Transfer Newsletter. 2012; 30: 15-26
Betteridge KJ. A history of farm animal embryo transfer and some associated techniques. Animal Reprod Sci. 2003; 79(3-4): 203- 244. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(03)00166-0
Larson J, Lamb G, Funnell B, Bird S, Martins A, Rodgers J. Embryo production in superovulated Angus cows inseminated four times with sexed-sorted or conventional, frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology. 2010; 73(5): 698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.11.009
Trasorras V, Chaves MG, Neild D, Gambarotta M, Aba M, Agüero A. Embryo transfer technique: Factors affecting the viability of the corpus luteum in llamas. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010; 121(3-4): 279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.06.004
Phillips PE, Jahnke MM. Embryo transfer (techniques, donors, and recipients). Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2016; 32(2): 365-385. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.01.008
Thibier M. Data retrieval committee annual report. IETS Newslett. 2006; 24: 12-18
Warriach H, McGill D, Bush R, Wynn P, Chohan K. A review of recent developments in buffalo reproduction—a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015; 28(3): 451-455. doi: 10.5713/ ajas.14.0259
Ongubo M, Rachuonyo H, Lusweti F, et al. Factors affecting conception rates in cattle following embryo transfer. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 16(1): 19-27. doi: 10.4314/ujas. v16i1.2
Blizinger SB. Embryo transfers becoming more popular with procedures, cattle today. Web site. http://www.cattletoday.com/ archive/2007/May/CT987.shtml. Accessed on November 02, 2007
Hasler J. Factors influencing the success of embryo transfer in cattle. Medecin Veterinaire Du Quebec. 2004; 34: 66-66
Hasler JF. The current status and future of commercial embryo transfer in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003; 79(3-4): 245-264. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(03)00167-2
Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007; 447(7143): 425-432. doi: 10.1038/nature05918
Morley K. Cloning technique. Web site. http://www.uq.edu. au. Office of public policy and Ethics Institute for molecular Bioscience: University of Queensland Australia; 2002; Brisbane, Australia. Accessed November 22, 2019
Vajta G, Gjerris M. Science and technology of farm animal cloning: State of the art. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006; 92(3-4): 211-230. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.12.001
Wells D. Animal cloning: Problems and prospects. Rev Sci Tech. 2005; 24(1): 251-264
Zoheir KM, Allam AA. A rapid method for sexing the bovine embryo. Animal Reprod Sci. 2010; 119(1-2): 92-96. doi: 10.1016/j. anireprosci.2009.12.013
Plummer WE, Beckett D. Development of successful sex determination method of bovine embryos utilizing embryo biopsy and PCR. Anim Sci. 2006. Adv Food Technol Nutr Sci Open J. 2020; 6(1): 13-20. doi: 10.17140/AFTNSOJ-6-164
Maxwell W, Johnson L. Chlortetracycline analysis of boar spermatozoa after incubation, flow cytometric sorting, cooling, or cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997; 46(3): 408- 418. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<408::AID-MRD21>3.0.CO;2-T
Seidel JG. Overview of sexing sperm. Theriogenology. 2007; 68(3): 443-446. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.005
Rajoriya R, Rajoriya S, Kumar N. Transgenic animals: Prospects for improving livestock productivity. J Bio Innov. 2013; 2(5): 240-259
Krimpenfort P, Rademakers A, Eyestone W, et al. Generation of transgenic dairy cattle using ‘in vitro’embryo production. Biotechnology. 1991; 9(9): 844-847. doi: 10.1038/nbt0991-844
Baccetti B, Spadafora C. Sperm-mediated gene transfer: Advances in sperm cell research and applications. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000; 56: 329-330
Transgenics T. Taconic W4/129S6 Embryonic Stem Cells. Web site. http://www.taconic.com/emerging/ESCells/ES_ WEB.htm. Accessed November 22, 2019. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Niemann H, Kues W, Carnwath J. Transgenic farm animals: Present and future. Rev Sci Tech. 2005; 24(1): 285-298
Wells DJ. Genetically modified animals and pharmacological research. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010; (199): 213-226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10324-7_9
Coppola G, Alexander B, Di Berardino D, St John E, Basrur PK, King WA. Use of cross-species in-situ hybridization (ZOO-FISH) to assess chromosome abnormalities in day-6 in-vivo-or in-vitro-produced sheep embryos. Chromosome Res. 2007; 15(3): 399-408. doi: 10.1007/s10577-007-1125-2
Cognie Y, Baril G, Poulin N, Mermillod P. Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goat. Theriogenology. 2003; 59(1): 171-188. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01270-0
O’Brien J, Hollinshead F, Evans G, Maxwell W. In vivo developmental capacity of in vitro-produced embryos derived from sex-sorted and re-cryopreserved frozen-thawed ram sperm. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2003; 16(2): 286-286. doi: 10.1071/RDv16n1Ab332
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Advances in Food Technology and Nutrition Sciences (AFTNS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.