Combining Ability Analysis in Sweet Corn (Zea Mays Saccharrata L.) Using Line by Tester Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/aftnsoj-6-168Keywords:
Sweet corn, General combining ability, Inbred lines, Line by tester, Yield, FloweringAbstract
Aim
The purpose of this study was to investigate the different combination of testcrosses for morphological and yield relating traits and to investigate general combining ability of the inbred lines.
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted at The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan during 2016. Line x-tester analysis was used to test general combining ability (GCA) effects of 24 S4 lines of sweet corn. Alpha lattice design with two replications and two checks was used during the experiment. Research data were recorded on various flowering, morphological and yield parameters.
Results
Highly significant variations were recorded among the testcrosses for the studied traits except anthesis silking interval (ASI), 100-kernel weight. Minimum days to tasseling (48-days) and silking (53.5-days) was exhibited by pop-syn-swt (9-4)×synthetic sweet. GCA effect was -2.14 for tasseling and -2.00 for silking. Maximum value (3.5-days) for ASI was recorded for Pop-syn-swt 1(8-3)×synthetic sweet, while GCA effect for ASI was -0.71. Lowest plant height (129.8 cm) was recorded for pop-syn-swt 1(3-3)×synthetic sweet, while GCA effect for plant height was observed to be -14.79. Maximum cob length (16.6 cm) was revealed by pop-syn-swt 1(12-2)×synthetic sweet. For cob length GCA effect of 1.01 was recorded. Maximum 100 kernel weight (31.3 g) was estimated for pop-syn-swt 1(2-1)×synthetic sweet. GCA effect of 1.85 was recorded for 100-kernel weight. Highest mean (7143.9 kg ha-1) for grain yield was recorded for pop-syn-swt 1(9-4)×synthetic sweet. GCA effect for grain yield was found to be 1370.93.
Conclusion
Generally a low GCA value, either positive or negative indicates that the mean of a parent does not largely vary from its offsprings. In contrast, high GCA value suggests that parent is either superior or inferior to the general mean and it has high heritability and less environmental effects. Based on the findings in this research, the above mentioned testcrosses can be included in future sweet corn breeding programs where early flowering and yield attributes is desired.
References
Saeed MT, Saleem M. Estimates of gene effects for some important qualitative plant traits in maize diallel crosses. Pak J Biol Sci. 2000; 3: 1989-1990. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.1138.1140
Marshall SW. Sweet corn. In: Stanley AW, Bamstad PE, eds. Corn-Chemistry and Technology. Minnesota, USA: Amer. Assoc. Cereal Chemists, Inc; 1987: 431-445
Khan Z, Khalil S, Farhatullah M, Khan MI, Basir A. Selecting optimum planting date for sweet corn in Peshawar. Sarhad J Agric. 2011; 27: 341-347
Ali Q, Ali A, Ahsan M, Nasir IA, Abbas HG, Ashraf MA. Line×Tester analysis for morpho-physiological traits of Zea mays L seedlings. Advancements in Life Sciences. 2014; 1: 242-253
Allard R. Principles of Plant Breeding. Wiley, New York, USA: Principles of plant breeding: 1960
Okello D, Manna R, Imanyowoha J, Pixley K, Edema R. Agronomic performance and breeding potential of selected inbred Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ lines for improvement of protein quality of adapted Ugandan maize germplasm. African Crop Science Journal. 2006; 14: 37-47
Kempthorne O. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. New York, USA: John Wiley And Sons, Inc.; 1957
Kamara MM, El-Degwy IS, Koyama H. Estimation combining ability of some maize inbred lines using line x-tester mating design under two nitrogen levels. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2014; 8: 1336
Nigussie M, Zelleke H. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel among eight elite maize populations. African Crop Science Journal 2001; 9: 471-479
Shah SS, Khalil I, Rafi A. Reaction of two maize synthetics to maydis leaf blight following recurrent selection for grain yield. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2006; 22: 263
Zaffar G, Shikari A, Rather M, Guleria S. Comparison of selection indices for screening maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm for cold tolerance. Cereal Research Communications. 2005; 33: 525-531. doi: 10.1556/CRC.33.2005.2-3.115
Barata C, Carena M. Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica. 2006; 151: 339-349. doi: 10.1007/s10681- 006-9155-y
Rahman H, Arifuddin Z, Shah S, Iqbal M, Khalil I. Evaluation of maize S2 lines in testcross combinations I: flowering and morphological traits. Pak J Bot. 2010; 42: 1619-1627
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Advances in Food Technology and Nutrition Sciences (AFTNS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.